Literature DB >> 24679438

Choice of operating voltage for a transmission electron microscope.

R F Egerton1.   

Abstract

An accelerating voltage of 100-300kV remains a good choice for the majority of TEM or STEM specimens, avoiding the expense of high-voltage microscopy but providing the possibility of atomic resolution even in the absence of lens-aberration correction. For specimens thicker than a few tens of nm, the image intensity and scattering contrast are likely to be higher than at lower voltage, as is the visibility of ionization edges below 1000eV (as required for EELS elemental analysis). In thick (>100nm) specimens, higher voltage ensures less beam broadening and better spatial resolution for STEM imaging and EDX spectroscopy. Low-voltage (e.g. 30kV) TEM or STEM is attractive for a very thin (e.g. 10nm) specimen, as it provides higher scattering contrast and fewer problems for valence-excitation EELS. Specimens that are immune to radiolysis suffer knock-on damage at high current densities, and this form of radiation damage can be reduced or avoided by choosing a low accelerating voltage. Low-voltage STEM with an aberration-corrected objective lens (together with a high-angle dark-field detector and/or EELS) offers atomic resolution and elemental identification from very thin specimens. Conventional TEM can provide atomic resolution in low-voltage phase-contrast images but requires correction of chromatic aberration and preferably an electron-beam monochromator. Many non-conducting (e.g. organic) specimens damage easily by radiolysis and radiation damage then determines the TEM image resolution. For bright-field scattering contrast, low kV can provide slightly better dose-limited resolution if the specimen is very thin (a few nm) but considerably better resolution is possible from a thicker specimen, for which higher kV is required. Use of a phase plate in a conventional TEM offers the most dose-efficient way of achieving atomic resolution from beam-sensitive specimens.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerating voltage; Contrast; Radiation damage; Resolution; STEM; TEM

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24679438     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultramicroscopy        ISSN: 0304-3991            Impact factor:   2.689


  11 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and opportunities in cryo-EM single-particle analysis.

Authors:  Dmitry Lyumkis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Analysis of complex, beam-sensitive materials by transmission electron microscopy and associated techniques.

Authors:  Martha Ilett; Mark S'ari; Helen Freeman; Zabeada Aslam; Natalia Koniuch; Maryam Afzali; James Cattle; Robert Hooley; Teresa Roncal-Herrero; Sean M Collins; Nicole Hondow; Andy Brown; Rik Brydson
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Multi-pass transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  Thomas Juffmann; Stewart A Koppell; Brannon B Klopfer; Colin Ophus; Robert M Glaeser; Mark A Kasevich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Importance of interlayer H bonding structure to the stability of layered minerals.

Authors:  Michele Conroy; Jennifer A Soltis; Rick S Wittman; Frances N Smith; Sayandev Chatterjee; Xin Zhang; Eugene S Ilton; Edgar C Buck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  EELS at very high energy losses.

Authors:  Ian MacLaren; Kirsty J Annand; Colin Black; Alan J Craven
Journal:  Microscopy (Oxf)       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.571

6.  The energy dependence of contrast and damage in electron cryomicroscopy of biological molecules.

Authors:  Mathew J Peet; Richard Henderson; Christopher J Russo
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  Engineering biomolecular systems: Controlling the self-assembly of gelatin to form ultra-small bioactive nanomaterials.

Authors:  Dhananjay Suresh; Agasthya Suresh; Raghuraman Kannan
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-03-14

8.  Multi-pass microscopy.

Authors:  Thomas Juffmann; Brannon B Klopfer; Timmo L I Frankort; Philipp Haslinger; Mark A Kasevich
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Achieving better-than-3-Å resolution by single-particle cryo-EM at 200 keV.

Authors:  Mark A Herzik; Mengyu Wu; Gabriel C Lander
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Imaging methods are vastly underreported in biomedical research.

Authors:  Guillermo Marqués; Thomas Pengo; Mark A Sanders
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.