Nils Skoglund1, Alejandro Grimm2, Marcus Ohman2, Dan Boström1. 1. Thermochemical Energy Conversion Laboratory, Department of Applied Physics and Electronics, Umeå University , SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden. 2. Energy Engineering, Department of Engineering Sciences & Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology , SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden.
Abstract
This is the first in a series of three papers describing combustion of biosolids in a 5-kW bubbling fluidized bed, the ash chemistry, and possible application of the ash produced as a fertilizing agent. This part of the study aims to clarify whether the distribution of main ash forming elements from biosolids can be changed by modifying the fuel matrix, the crystalline compounds of which can be identified in the raw materials and what role the total composition may play for which compounds are formed during combustion. The biosolids were subjected to low-temperature ashing to investigate which crystalline compounds that were present in the raw materials. Combustion experiments of two different types of biosolids were conducted in a 5-kW benchscale bubbling fluidized bed at two different bed temperatures and with two different additives. The additives were chosen to investigate whether the addition of alkali (K2CO3) and alkaline-earth metal (CaCO3) would affect the speciation of phosphorus, so the molar ratios targeted in modified fuels were P:K = 1:1 and P:K:Ca = 1:1:1, respectively. After combustion the ash fractions were collected, the ash distribution was determined and the ash fractions were analyzed with regards to elemental composition (ICP-AES and SEM-EDS) and part of the bed ash was also analyzed qualitatively using XRD. There was no evidence of zeolites in the unmodified fuels, based on low-temperature ashing. During combustion, the biosolid pellets formed large bed ash particles, ash pellets, which contained most of the total ash content (54%-95% (w/w)). This ash fraction contained most of the phosphorus found in the ash and the only phosphate that was identified was a whitlockite, Ca9(K,Mg,Fe)(PO4)7, for all fuels and fuel mixtures. With the addition of potassium, cristobalite (SiO2) could no longer be identified via X-ray diffraction (XRD) in the bed ash particles and leucite (KAlSi2O6) was formed. Most of the alkaline-earth metals calcium and magnesium were also found in the bed ash. Both the formation of aluminum-containing alkali silicates and inclusion of calcium and magnesium in bed ash could assist in preventing bed agglomeration during co-combustion of biosolids with other renewable fuels in a full-scale bubbling fluidized bed.
This is the first in a series of three papers describing combustion of biosolids in a 5-kW bubbling fluidized bed, the ash chemistry, and possible application of the ash produced as a fertilizing agent. This part of the study aims to clarify whether the distribution of main ash forming elements from biosolids can be changed by modifying the fuel matrix, the crystalline compounds of which can be identified in the raw materials and what role the total composition may play for which compounds are formed during combustion. The biosolids were subjected to low-temperature ashing to investigate which crystalline compounds that were present in the raw materials. Combustion experiments of two different types of biosolids were conducted in a 5-kW benchscale bubbling fluidized bed at two different bed temperatures and with two different additives. The additives were chosen to investigate whether the addition of alkali (K2CO3) and alkaline-earth metal (CaCO3) would affect the speciation of phosphorus, so the molar ratios targeted in modified fuels were P:K = 1:1 and P:K:Ca = 1:1:1, respectively. After combustion the ash fractions were collected, the ash distribution was determined and the ash fractions were analyzed with regards to elemental composition (ICP-AES and SEM-EDS) and part of the bed ash was also analyzed qualitatively using XRD. There was no evidence of zeolites in the unmodified fuels, based on low-temperature ashing. During combustion, the biosolid pellets formed large bed ash particles, ash pellets, which contained most of the totalash content (54%-95% (w/w)). This ash fraction contained most of the phosphorus found in the ash and the only phosphate that was identified was a whitlockite, Ca9(K,Mg,Fe)(PO4)7, for all fuels and fuel mixtures. With the addition of potassium, cristobalite (SiO2) could no longer be identified via X-ray diffraction (XRD) in the bed ash particles and leucite (KAlSi2O6) was formed. Most of the alkaline-earth metals calcium and magnesium were also found in the bed ash. Both the formation of aluminum-containing alkali silicates and inclusion of calcium and magnesium in bed ash could assist in preventing bed agglomeration during co-combustion of biosolids with other renewable fuels in a full-scale bubbling fluidized bed.
As the world’s
population grows larger, it becomes increasingly
important to manage and recycle nutrients from biomass back to soil
for a more sustainable food and energy production. Recycling ash from
renewable fuels is one way to improve element recovery to facilitate
a sustainable biomass production. A resource that is related to biomass
production in agriculture is municipal sewage sludge, also known as
biosolids after further treatment such as digestion. This waste stream
resource contains a lot of energy, even after biogas production through
digestion, and the high content of macronutrients in biosolids makes
it interesting both as a sustainable nutrient resource for new crops
and as a co-combustion fuel where the ash produced also could be used
as a nutrient resource.[1−5] Incineration of biosolids has the benefits of energy recovery, destruction
of both pathogens and anthropogenic chemicals (e.g., pharmaceutical
agents and persistent organic pollutants)[6−8] with the possibility
of creating an ash with macronutrients available for plants.[5,9,10]Several studies have shown
that biosolids can improve the combustion
properties of biomass by reducing the risk of corrosion and fouling,
reducing bed agglomeration tendencies and possibly enabling a higher
process temperature for some problematic fuels.[11−15] Even if the high ash content in biosolids may pose
a challenge for monocombustion it also means that relatively small
amounts of biosolids in co-combustion scenarios will have a large
impact on the overall ash chemistry.[11,14−16]How ash can be turned into a resource of macronutrients after
combustion
and how it affects the thermal energy conversion plant should be considered
when designing a co-combustion fuel mixture. As one of the main ash-forming
elements in renewable fuels, phosphorus may play an important role
in the behavior of fuel ash, depending on its total concentration.[12,13,15,17−22] Biosolids typically contain a lot of phosphorus, compared to renewable
fuels in general.[23] One way of recovering
phosphorus from these biosolids is to incinerate the biosolid either
by monocombustion or co-combustion and use the resulting ash as a
nutrient source. If co-combustion is made with other waste streams
from food production, it could be possible to improve recycling of
phosphorus and other nutrients within agriculture. Such an approach
may decrease the dependency of mineral-bound nutrient sources, which
would benefit long-term sustainability in food production.In
order to create an efficient phosphorus recovery, it is important
to concentrate as much of the phosphorus as possible to specific ash
fractions, regardless of whether this ash is going to be used directly
or further treated to a refined product. If an ash fraction such as
fly ash from circulating fluidized beds or bed ash from bubbling fluidized
beds is used directly as a fertilizer, having an ash fraction with
high phosphorus imply that smaller amounts of ash need to be applied
to reach the desired phosphorus amount per hectare. This also suggests
adding less material with low nutritional value to the soil and that
smaller amounts of elements that are potentially harmful to the environment
would be distributed to the soil when less ash needs to be used to
reach the same phosphorusfertilization. If the ash fraction is used
in a workup process, having a high phosphorus content would suggest
that less chemicals may be required to extract the same amount of
phosphorus. It is also important to design the fuel blend in co-combustion,
so that phosphorus can be found in a chemical form that is readily
available for plants; this is vital for direct use of ash but also
means that less chemicals may be needed in a phosphorus recovery/refinement
process.Fluidized-bed technology is a suitable method for sewage
sludge
combustion, where tolerance for fuel variations and complete fuel
burnout are stressed as important features.[1,24] Experiments
with co-combustion of biosolid in a circulating fluidized bed have
been used to evaluate the distribution of main ash-forming elements
and trace metals.[9,12,14,25,26] Phosphorus
was enriched in the fly ashes, where it was found together with significant
levels of several trace metals that are harmful to the environment.[27] Compared to circulating fluidized beds (CFBs),
a bubbling fluidized bed may retain a larger part of the totalash
in the bed ash fraction and separates volatile ash components into
the flue gas better than a CFB, providing a higher degree of ash fractionation.
Pelletizing or granulating fuels or mixtures containing biosolids
may help fuel particles endure the abrasive environment to form ash
pellets during combustion. The formation of such ash particles with
a large part of the fuel ash and high phosphorus content was observed
during co-combustion of wheat straw with biosolids in a bubbling fluidized
bed.[14] It should be pointed out that it
is important to consider the overall ash chemistry to enrich phosphorus
in the bed ash particles and also reduce the amount of volatile and
potentially harmful elements in the bed ash, such as mercury and cadmium.To explore this approach to phosphorus recovery, it is important
to investigate how the ash from pelletized biosolids is distributed
in a bubbling fluidized-bed furnace, in which the ash fraction of
phosphorus can be found, and in which the chemical form it is present.
In addition, it is important to see if the alkali and alkaline-earth
metal content in potential co-combustion fuel blends will affect phosphorus
speciation.The aim of this paper is to discuss (i) the distribution
of phosphorus
and other main ash-forming elements when combusting pelletized biosolids
in a bubbling fluidized bed; (ii) in which chemical form these elements
can be found; and (iii) how biosolid ash affects combustion properties.
Environmentally harmful elements and leaching characteristics will
be discussed and further evaluated in a second paper, and a third
paper will discuss how biosolid ash compares to other fertilizers
in plant growth experiments.
Materials
and Methods
Fuels and Additives
The biosolids
used in this study were digested municipal sewage sludge from two
different wastewater treatment facilities, and also two chemical additives
were used to investigate how an increase of alkali and alkaline-earth
metal content affects the ash chemistry, which is related to co-combustion
properties with biomass fuels. Potassium and calcium were used since
it is well-known that these elements play important roles in biomass
ash chemistry, where potassium is considered problematic and calcium
may remedy ash-related problems. Different precipitation agents were
used for the two types of biosolids during the wastewater treatment
process. Biosolid A, retrieved at the municipal wastewater treatment
facility in Tuvan, Skellefteå, Sweden, was precipitated with
polyaluminum hydroxychloride (PAC) (Ekoflock 91, Eka Chemicals) and
Biosolid B retrieved at the municipal wastewater treatment facility
on Ön, Umeå, Sweden was precipitated with iron(II) sulfate
(FeSO4) (COP, Kemira). Biosolid A was obtained as pellets
that had undergone hygienization with a water content of ∼20%
and Biosolid B was acquired as dehydrated sludge with a water content
of ∼60%. Biosolid B was further dried at ∼130 °C
until the water content had reached ∼10%.The two raw
materials were milled and pelletized in three different fractions;
one fraction containing the unmodified sewage sludge, one fraction
with addition of K2CO3 (>98% Fisher Scientific),
and one fraction with addition of both K2CO3 and CaCO3 (>98%, Fisher Scientific). The additives
were
introduced to achieve a 1:1 molar ratio between P and K in the first
blend and 1:1:1 molar ratio between P, K, and Ca in the latter case.
These molar ratios were chosen to see whether potassium could be included
in ternary phosphates. Rapeseed oil (∼3% (w/w)) and water were
added to the raw materials to facilitate the pelletizing process.
This resulted in six types of 6 mm (diameter) pellets with good durability
during the fuel feed. The elemental composition for the six types
are shown in Table 1 including reference values[28] for typical sewage sludge elemental composition
in Sweden.
Table 1
Elemental Composition of the Six Pelletized
Fuels with Reference Values for Typical Sewage Sludge Composition;
Main Ash-Forming Elements Are Shown, Together with Some Molar Ratios
of Interest
Elemental
Composition (% (w/w) of d.s.)
Data from ref (28), average (min–max)
Biosolid A
Biosolid A + K (P:K = 1:1)
Biosolid A + K + Ca (P:K:Ca = 1:1:1)
Biosolid B
Biosolid B + K (P:K = 1:1)
Biosolid B + K + Ca (P:K:Ca = 1:1:1)
ash contenta (% (w/w) of d.s.)
n.a.
35.0
38.0
40.1
38.9
43.1
44.6
LHVb (MJ/kg d.s.)
n.a.
13.8
13.6
12.7
13.3
12.7
12.0
elemental composition (%)
K
0.44 (0.07–1.2)
0.42
3.90
4.03
0.32
5.40
4.34
Na
0.35 (0.08–3.0)
0.25
0.23
0.22
0.16
0.16
0.14
Ca
2.8 (0.62–19)
2.21
1.99
4.16
2.59
2.46
4.45
Mg
0.34 (0.08–0.63)
0.29
0.27
0.25
0.25
0.24
0.23
Al
4.0 (0.68–9.2)
5.50
5.13
4.78
1.71
1.60
1.48
Fe
4.9 (0.44–15)
2.83
2.52
2.35
10.07
9.44
8.81
Si
4.5 (1.6–15)
3.90
3.64
3.42
2.95
2.74
2.53
P
2.7 (1.1–5.5)
3.37
3.19
2.95
3.88
3.61
3.44
S
0.9 (0.42–2.6)
1.12
1.04
1.03
1.16
0.94
1.07
Cl
n.a.
0.046
0.044
0.042
0.026
0.020
0.019
Ash content determined after ashing
at 550 °C.
Lower heating
value.
Calculated molar
ratios in the pelletized
fuels.
Ash content determined after ashing
at 550 °C.Lower heating
value.Calculated molar
ratios in the pelletized
fuels.
Low-Temperature
Ashing
Since previous
work suggests that aluminosilicates in the form of zeolites may be
important for the capture of alkali metals,[29] it is of interest to clarify whether the two biosolids used in this
study contain zeolites. Pellets of Biosolids A and B were subjected
to low-temperature ashing at 120 °C in a Quorum Technologies,
Ltd., Model PT7160 RF plasma barrel etcher, using an oxygen and argon
atmosphere until no weight change could be observed. The resulting
ash was then analyzed semiquantitatively with XRD to identify the
compounds that were present.
Combustion Experiments
A 2-m-high
benchscale bubbling fluidized bed with an inner bed diameter of 100
mm and a freeboard inner diameter of 200 mm was used for the combustion
experiments. The bed material was quartz (>98%) with a grain size
of 200–250 μm. Fuel feeding of 6 mm diameter pellets
with a length of 5–25 mm was continuous. The combustion period
lasted for 75 min or until bed defluidization occurred, since the
high ash content of the pellets made longer combustion periods unsustainable
in the experimental setup which did not have the possibility of ash
removal. During this time, the oxygen level was kept at 8%–10%
with a fluidization velocity ∼10 times the minimum fluidization
velocity (∼1 m/s). The experiments were carried out at an effect
of ∼2.5 kW at two different bed temperatures for each mixture:
800 and 950 °C. The freeboard section of the furnace was kept
at the same temperature as the bed, using electrical heaters. The
bed material and cyclone ash (>10 μm cutoff particle size
in
the cyclone) was collected after cooling. Particulate matter sampling
was made using total dust Teflon filters, allowing for subsequent
qualitative analysis of K, Na, P, S, and Fe.
Ash Fractions—Quantitative
and Qualitative
Analysis
The ash distributed between bed ash, cyclone ash,
and total particulate matter (PM-tot) were weighed and subjected to
elemental analysis (all ash fractions) and XRD analysis (large bed
ash particles). The large bed ash particles represents a bed ash fraction
that was sieved out of the bed ash with a considerably larger sieving
particle size than the bed material (>1.2 mm, compared to the 0.200–0.250
mm of sieved bed material). Another bed ash particle fraction in the
range of 0.300–1.2 mm was sieved in order to improve the closure
of the mass balance. The large bed ash particles (>1.2 mm) were
analyzed
both qualitatively, using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) for Cl and inductively
coupled plasma–atomic emission spectroscopy–section-field
mass spectroscopy (ICP-AES/SFMS) for other elements, according to
modified EPA methods 200.7 and 200.8 with three replicates, and quantitatively,
using XRD. Elemental analysis was carried out with SEM-EDS for the
smaller bed ash particle fraction (0.300 < x <
1.2 mm) and the remaining bed material containing both ash and bed
sand was not subjected to further analysis in this study. Elemental
analysis of the smaller bed ash fraction and the cyclone ash was made
using SEM-EDS on a Philips XL30 electron microscope equipped with
an EDAX energy dispersive detector. Samples were mounted on a carbon
tape and three representative areas were analyzed, the size of these
areas varied somewhat with analysis area side lengths in the range
of 200–750 μm, depending on the sample amount and distribution
on the carbon tape. Total particulate matter Teflon filter (PM-tot)
analysis was performed via ICP-AES, according to modified EPA methods
200.7 and 200.8 for K, Na, P, S, and Fe. The sample preparation procedure
for Teflon filters did not allow for a more extensive elemental analysis.
The XRD analysis of ash from low-temperature ashing and for large
bed ash particles was made with a Bruker-AXS d8 Avance X-ray diffractometer
using Cu Kα radiation and a Våntec-1 detector. Compounds
were identified using Diffracplus EVA[30] with the PDF-2[31] database. The
diffractograms were further analyzed in Diffracplus TOPAS,[32] using Rietveld refinement techniques with reference
data from ICSD[33] for a semiquantitative
analysis of the crystalline matter in these samples.
Results and Discussion
Raw Material
No
evidence of zeolite
presence was found in the XRD analysis of ashes from low-temperature
treatment of either biosolid (see Table 2).
This implies that there are, at most, trace amounts of zeolites originating
from detergents or other sources. Silicates containing aluminum and
alkali, such as microcline and albite, were identified. For the sludge
precipitated with iron(II) sulfate, some hematite was also found.
As can be seen in the diffractogram (see Figure 1), the prominent peaks, and, for zeolites, typical peaks[34−36] in the 2θ range of 15°–20° are absent. If
zeolites are present in biosolids, they are likely to be associated
with cations, such as sodium or calcium, so when biosolids are used
in co-combustion, the importance of zeolites as an alkali adsorbent
is probably smaller than has been suggested in previous publications.[11,37] There are trace amounts of other compounds, which could not be positively
identified, which is most evident with the broad peak in Biosolid
B in the 2θ range of 30°–32° with overlaid
peaks belonging to other compounds.
Table 2
Results from the
Semiquantitative
XRD Analysis of Low-Temperature Ashed Material
Content
(%, w/w)
Biosolid A
Biosolid B
quartz
40
52
albite
39
16
microcline
21
27
hematite
5
Figure 1
Diffractogram from XRD analysis of ash from low-temperature ashing.
The area from 15°–20 2θ° lacks any clear peaks
that should have been present with zeolites in the ash samples.
Diffractogram from XRD analysis of ash from low-temperature ashing.
The area from 15°–20 2θ° lacks any clear peaks
that should have been present with zeolites in the ash samples.
Ash Distribution
The ash distribution
in the bubbling fluidized bed is shown in Figure 2. When sieving the bed ash particle fraction (>1.2 mm)
it
was noticed that the bulk of the bed ash particles appeared to have
survived the abrasive conditions in the bubbling bed, since the cylindrical
pellet shape was retained for the ash particles after burn out (see
Figure 2). The rest fraction in the total mass
balance (Figure 2) is dominated by bed ash
that has a sieving particle size smaller than 0.300 mm. Sieving more
bed ash by working with smaller sizes would cause a large error in
total mass, because of the increased inclusion of bed material.
Figure 2
Mass distribution
of ash between different ash fractions.
Mass distribution
of ash between different ash fractions.Large bed ash particles, such as those shown in Figure 3, comprised 54%–95% (w/w) of the totalash
content. This shows a high degree of retention of nonvolatile main
ash forming elements in the bed ash, preferentially in the large bed
ash particles. These “ash pellets” were more brittle
for Biosolid A than the ones formed by Biosolid B. That affected the
amount of cyclone ash and particulate matter—Biosolid A produced
a much larger cyclone ash fraction than Biosolid B in general. The
amounts of particulate matter show similar trends. The rest fraction,
which mainly consisted of bed ash particles smaller than 0.300 mm
and some material sticking to the reactor walls, was also larger for
biosolid A. Since one of the largest differences between biosolids
A and B is their respective precipitation chemicals, PAC and iron(II)
sulfate, the variations in durability of the ash pellets, as judged
by relative mass in the large bed ash fraction, could originate from
the large difference in aluminum and iron content. Even if that is
the case, it cannot be stated with certainty, based on this study,
if sludge precipitated with one chemical is to prefer over sludge
precipitated with another. The larger mass fraction kept in “ash
pellets” for biosolid B could possibly indicate some melt formation
within the ash particles whereas ash from biosolid A could have a
higher overall melting point despite being more brittle which of course
is important from a bed agglomeration point of view particularly when
considering co-combustion. An in-depth study of this effect of aluminum
and iron is beyond the scope of the work presented here.
Figure 3
Example of
“ash pellets”. These were formed during
the combustion of Biosolid B with the addition of K2CO3 at 800 °C.
Example of
“ash pellets”. These were formed during
the combustion of Biosolid B with the addition of K2CO3 at 800 °C.
Main Ash-Forming Elements
The main
ash-forming elements are here considered to be K, Na, Ca, Mg, Al,
Fe, Si, P, S, and Cl. First, the distribution and speciation of phosphorus
will be discussed in detail, followed by the other anion (Lewis base)
formers (Si, S, Cl). Elements forming positive ions will be mentioned
based on what ionic charge they have. Brief comments on melting points
are included for elements which are considered to benefit problematic
fuels in co-combustion since melting points are important for bed
agglomeration and slag formation.Phosphorus
was found to be enriched in the large bed ash particles
proportionally to the amount introduced with the fuel (see Figure 4). The main phosphorus-containing compound identified
in the bed was a whitlockite (see Table 3).
This specific structure is fairly accommodating regarding which cations
can be incorporated. Both Ca9Fe(PO4)7 and Ca9KMg(PO4)7 have been identified
previously.[9] These limited solid solutions
result in almost identical diffractograms which hampers the possibility
to distinguish between different compositions due to small changes
in their crystal structure. No certain composition of the whitlockite
found in this study can be assigned, based on present observations,
but altogether we find the whitlockite compounds suggested above to
be likely candidates. From the literature[38−43] it is evident that whitlockite can act as host structure for a larger
number of divalent, monovalent, and trivalent cations. Apparently,
properties of the whitlockite crystal structure admit complicated
but restricted solid solutions. Whitlockite will most likely serve
as an important host phase for alkali metal retention which is one
of the interesting aspects of using biosolid for co-combustion. However,
there is a risk that some environmentally harmful elements also may
be retained due to flexibility of the positive cat-ion sites in this
structure
Figure 4
Distribution of phosphorus from the fuel between the different
ash fractions.
Table 3
Semiquantitative
Analysis of Crystalline
Phases in Bed Ash Particles Larger than 1.2 mm
Biosolid
A
Biosolid
A + K, P:K = 1:1
Biosolid
A + K + Ca, P:K:Ca = 1:1:1
Biosolid
B
Biosolid
B + K, P:K = 1:1
Biosolid
B + K + Ca, P:K:Ca = 1:1:1
800 °C
950 °C
800 °C
950
°C
800 °C
950 °C
800 °C
950 °C
800
°C
950 °C
800 °C
950 °C
whitlockite
31
45
35
27
46
53
29
20
26
12
26
32
quartz
22
12
18
16
14
8
21
16
9
13
10
7
cristobalite
10
13
11
11
plagioclase
7
16
6
11
2
8
14
9
9
11
5
microcline
19
2
17
16
9
20
6
2
7
13
3
leucite
43
11
11
23
17
arkanite
17
4
4
7
14
9
8
6
anhydrite
3
hematite
1
8
7
10
6
10
2
33
29
27
32
30
maghemite
10
4
9
Distribution of phosphorus from the fuel between the different
ash fractions.As previously mentioned,
silicon is present as both quartz and
two feldspar minerals in biosolid raw materials. When the unmodified
fuels (no additive) are combusted there is some formation of cristobalite,
which indicate that there are Lewis bases other than silica that will
react with the cations present in the fuel. Cristobalite has previously
been identified for instance when using additives with wheat straw
and fuels containing husks.[18,44] As the amount of cations
is increased by the use of additives, cristobalite cannot be identified
in the large bed ash particles. Instead a shift is seen toward the
formation of albite, microcline, and leucite. The leucite is mainly
produced in the 950 °C experiments, and with addition of only
K2CO3 to each biosolid.Sulfur and chlorine
are more volatile Lewis base precursors, forming
sulfates and chlorides, respectively. The large rest fraction shown
in Figure 5 can be found either in bed ash
or in flue gas, primarily as sulfur dioxide gas (SO2 (g)).
For all mixtures where K2CO3 was added, K2SO4 formed in large bed ash particles. Trace amounts
of CaSO4 could be found after combustion at 800 °C
for biosolid A after addition of both K2CO3 and
CaCO3. When this mixture was combusted at 950 °C,
this trace amount had disappeared and the crystalline amount of K2SO4 increased slightly in the bed while the sulfur
amount in PM-tot also increased. This shows the high potential for
alkali capture by sulfur present in biosolids. An increase in combustion
temperature generally decreased the amount of sulfur that was found
in the bed. There was no trace of chlorine in the large bed ash particles
but small amounts could be found in the cyclone ash. It is likely
that most of the chlorine has been volatilized as HCl.
Figure 5
Distribution of sulfur
from the fuel between the different ash
fractions.
Distribution of sulfur
from the fuel between the different ash
fractions.Potassium and sodium as alkali
metals display a slight difference
in behavior. Both are mostly retained in the large bed ash particles
by reaction with various Lewis bases (see Table 3, as well as Figures 6 and 7). The calculated sodium content based on fuel analyses underestimated
the totalsodium content, compared to ash fraction samples, shown
in Figure 6 as a lack of rest fraction. The
sodium concentration in total particulate matter increases at the
higher combustion temperature to always surpass the potassium concentration,
even in the experiments where K2CO3 has been
added to the biosolids. This suggests a more efficient retention of
potassium in the bed ash and, to some extent, in the cyclone ash at
higher bed temperatures.
Figure 6
Distribution of potassium from the fuel between
the different ash
fractions.
Figure 7
Distribution of sodium from the fuel between
the different ash
fractions.
Distribution of potassium from the fuel between
the different ash
fractions.Distribution of sodium from the fuel between
the different ash
fractions.Calcium and magnesium were largely
found in bed ash particles and,
to some extent, in cyclone ash (see Figures 8 and 9). This distribution is consistent with
that contributed by these alkaline-earth elements toward increasing
the melting point when included in feldspars such as albite and reducing
volatility and melting points of phosphorus compounds. The transport
of calcium and magnesium from the bed should mainly be attributed
to entrainment of small bed ash particles with flue gas rather than
condensation from a gas phase, which could be the case for alkali
metals. The brittle ash particles produced by Biosolid A emphasizes
this mass transport from bed to cyclone ash while very little Ca and
Mg is found in cyclone ash or later in the system for Biosolid B.
This abundance of calcium in particular that may increase the overall
melting temperature of bed ash is of great importance when considering
co-combustion of biosolids with more problematic fuels.
Figure 8
Distribution
of calcium from the fuel between the different ash
fractions.
Figure 9
Distribution of magnesium from the fuel between
the different ash
fractions.
Distribution
of calcium from the fuel between the different ash
fractions.Distribution of magnesium from the fuel between
the different ash
fractions.Aluminum is mainly found in bed
ash and the rest fraction, plausibly
increasing the melting point of the silicate systems found in this
study (see Table 3 and Figure 10). In the cases where additives were used with biosolids,
the phase leucite (KAlSi2O6) was formed at 950
°C for both biosolids and at 800 °C for Biosolid B with
the addition of K2CO3. The silica phase cristobalite
disappears with the addition of potassium to the biosolids for all
mixtures and temperatures. In order to form leucite, aluminum in some
form (e.g., chloride from precipitation agent) must react with silica
and potassium compounds. An alternative formation path may be a reaction
where feldspars, microcline in this study, reacts with aluminum and
potassium compounds. Since leucite is formed under these conditions,
it may be concluded that it is more stable than ternary Ca–K-phosphates.
The complete speciation of inherent aluminum in biosolids cannot be
deduced based on results in the present study.
Figure 10
Distribution of aluminum from the fuel between
the different ash
fractions.
Iron in the biosolid
material typically oxidizes to Fe3+, which is evident from
observed amounts of Fe2O3, a change that is
promoted by higher temperature. At 950 °C,
all iron identified by XRD is found as hematite. Another iron(III)
species that occurs in small amounts at 800 °C for some mixtures
is maghemite which also has the sum formula (Fe2O3). There may exist iron in the whitlockiteCa9Fe(PO4)7; however, as discussed above, this cannot be
stated with certainty.Distribution of aluminum from the fuel between
the different ash
fractions.Based on these bench-scale
experiments it is likely that biosolids
could be combusted in a full-scale bubbling fluidized bed to produce
a bed ash fraction which contains most of the phosphorus introduced
with the fuel where a pretreatment step to produce durable bed ash
particles after fuel burn-out possibly could increase phosphorus recovery.
Some alkali may be retained in the bed ash in aluminum silicates where
the aluminum content contributes to higher melting points of alkali-containing
aluminum silicates in the bed ash. Calcium and magnesium have the
same positive effects when included in the silicate structure. This
suggests that some waste streams from agriculture where bed agglomeration
can be attributed to alkali silicate melt formation could be an alternative
when considering co-combustion with biosolids in bubbling fluidized
beds. The high amount of sulfur in biosolids could possibly prevent
of alkali chloride formation in the flue gas by sulfate formation
instead. Since the amount of biosolids or undigested municipal sewage
sludge available could be a limiting factor for full-scale systems
it is important to investigate which co-combustion biomasses that
may be suitable and the effect of changing the ratio of biosolids
to biomass in such co-combustion mixtures. Studies on the pretreatment
process are needed to increase the amount of material staying in a
large bed ash fraction which would also facilitate phosphorus recovery.
Conclusions
Results in this study suggest
that combustion of prepelletized/granulated
biosolids in bubbling fluidized beds, possibly co-fired with other
K- and Ca-rich biomass fuels, could be a suitable technique for recovering
macronutrients such as phosphorus from this waste stream.Large bed ash
particles were
found to contain a large part of the ash where the biosolid forming
the hardest bed ashalso gave the highest yield of ash pellets. Fuel
pretreatment such as pelletizing or granulation may therefore be important
for higher phosphorus recovery yields from specific ash fractions.Concentrations of
main ash-forming
elements other than chlorine are increased in bed ash compared to
those found in totalash content, meaning that combustion acts as
an enrichment process. Phosphorus in particular was enriched in bed
ash pellets in proportion to the amount introduced with the fuel.Phosphorus was found
as a whitlockite
and a solid solution with a composition similar to Ca9(Fe,K,Mg)(PO4)7 is a likely candidate. Potassium addition resulted
in the formation of leucite (KAlSi2O6) at high
temperatures and some arcanite (K2SO4) formation
for all fuel blends. The only observed effect of calcium addition
was generally increased levels of whitlockite for Biosolid A and at
950 °C for Biosolid B. The silica phase cristobalite present
in ash from unmodified biosolids was not identified in the fuel blends,
suggesting aluminum silicate formation as a result of the alkali and
alkaline-earth metal addition.The absence of zeolites in ash
from low-temperature ashing suggests that the role of zeolites as
alkali adsorbent during combustion of biosolids is insignificant,
whereas the overall aluminum content in conjunction with reactive
silica is important.