Literature DB >> 24678139

Oviposition habitat selection by container-dwelling mosquitoes: responses to cues of larval and detritus abundances in the field.

Joseph E Fader1, Steven A Juliano1.   

Abstract

Insects' oviposition responses to resource and larval densities can be important factors determining distributions and competitive interactions of larvae. Aedes albopictus (Skuse) and Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) show aggregated distributions of larvae in the field, larval interactions that are affected by detritus resources, and oviposition responses to resource and density cues in the laboratory. We conducted field experiments testing whether these species choose oviposition sites in response to chemical cues indicating detritus resource quantity and quality or larval abundances.In experiment 1, both species showed interactive responses to water conditioned with high or low quantities of senescent live oak leaves and density combinations of A. albopictus and A. aegypti larvae. Aedes aegypti preferred high-detritus containers when conspecifics were absent. Aedes albopictus tended to prefer high-detritus containers when larval density was low. We found no evidence of interspecific differences in oviposition preferences.In experiment 2, A. albopictus preferred high detritus over low or no detritus, and rapidly-decaying, high-quality detritus over low-quality detritus.Oviposition choices by these Aedes are mainly determined by resource quantity and quality, with larval densities having minor, variable effects. Oviposition responses of these species are unlikely to lead to resource partitioning. Aggregated distributions of these species in the field are unlikely to be products of oviposition choices based on larval densities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aedes aegypti; Aedes albopictus; aggregation; larval density; oviposition choice; resource abundance; resource partitioning

Year:  2014        PMID: 24678139      PMCID: PMC3963180          DOI: 10.1111/een.12095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Entomol        ISSN: 0307-6946            Impact factor:   2.465


  25 in total

1.  Spatial contagion of predation risk affects colonization dynamics in experimental aquatic landscapes.

Authors:  William J Resetarits; Christopher A Binckley
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Explaining local species diversity.

Authors:  B Shorrocks; J G Sevenster
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The presence of oviposition attractants of Aedes albopictus larval holding water on Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  S Sucharit; W Tumrasvin; S Vutikes; S Leemingsawat
Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 0.267

4.  Consequences of detritus type in an aquatic microsystem: effects on water quality, micro-organisms and performance of the dominant consumer.

Authors:  Donald A Yee; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Freshw Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.809

5.  Oviposition responses of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus to certain fatty acid esters.

Authors:  Kavita R Sharma; T Seenivasagan; A N Rao; K Ganesan; O P Agarwal; R C Malhotra; Shri Prakash
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Role of bacteria in mediating the oviposition responses of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Jonathan D Trexler; Charles S Apperson; Ludek Zurek; César Gemeno; Coby Schal; Michael Kaufman; Edward Walker; D Wesley Watson; Lance Wallace
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.278

7.  Spatial and temporal patterns of coexistence between competing Aedes mosquitoes in urban Florida.

Authors:  Paul T Leisnham; S A Juliano
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  An empirical test of the aggregation model of coexistence and consequences for competing container-dwelling mosquitoes.

Authors:  Joseph E Fader; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Oviposition attraction and repellency of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to waters from conspecific larvae subjected to crowding, confinement, starvation, or infection.

Authors:  N Zahiri; M E Rau
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.278

Review 10.  Species interactions among larval mosquitoes: context dependence across habitat gradients.

Authors:  Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 19.686

View more
  5 in total

1.  Conditioning of Leaf Detritus Modulates Density-Dependent Growth of Aedes triseriatus Larvae (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  B C Norman; E D Walker
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Contributions of temporal segregation, oviposition choice, and non-additive effects of competitors to invasion success of Aedes japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) in North America.

Authors:  Ebony G Murrell; Bruce H Noden; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Biol Invasions       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  No Impact of Biocontrol Agent's Predation Cues on Development Time or Size of Surviving Aedes albopictus under Optimal Nutritional Availability.

Authors:  Marie C Russell; Lauren J Cator
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.769

4.  Attracted to the enemy: Aedes aegypti prefers oviposition sites with predator-killed conspecifics.

Authors:  Daniel Albeny-Simões; Ebony G Murrell; Simon L Elliot; Mateus R Andrade; Eraldo Lima; Steven A Juliano; Evaldo F Vilela
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Mind the Wound!-Fruit Injury Ranks Higher than, and Interacts with, Heterospecific Cues for Drosophila suzukii Oviposition.

Authors:  Renate Kienzle; Marko Rohlfs
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 2.769

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.