Literature DB >> 2467802

A method for determining optimal interelectrode spacing for cerebral topographic mapping.

A R Spitzer1, L G Cohen, J Fabrikant, M Hallett.   

Abstract

Inappropriately large interelectrode spacing may result in significant errors of localization and erroneous measurements of amplitudes, due to aliasing. Oversampling with very large numbers of scalp electrodes is impractical. We present a generally applicable method for determination of optimal interelectrode spacing. This optimal spacing is computed from the Nyquist distance for the potential of interest. For most potentials, the bandwidth of the topographic distribution is not known, so it must be first measured by oversampling with tightly spaced electrode arrays. The Nyquist distance will vary for different types of cerebral potentials, different components of a given potential, and for different areas of the scalp. We have determined the Nyquist distances for interelectrode spacing necessary to record accurately the geographically small components of the SEP in the region of the sensory strip. These distances are less than 3 cm, which is significantly smaller than the 7 cm distance of the 10-20 system. Recordings of SEPs in this region made with larger spacings may have significant errors. Recordings made at the Nyquist distance may be precisely interpolated to arbitrary accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2467802     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90072-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  11 in total

1.  A spatial power spectrum analysis of the electroencephalogram.

Authors:  R B Paranjape; Z J Koles; J Lind
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Steady-state visually evoked potential topography associated with a visual vigilance task.

Authors:  R B Silberstein; M A Schier; A Pipingas; J Ciorciari; S R Wood; D G Simpson
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 3.  Electroencephalography in epilepsy surgery planning.

Authors:  Dean P Sarco; John F Burke; Joseph R Madsen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Brain mapping--a useful tool or a dangerous toy?

Authors:  C D Binnie; B B MacGillivray
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  The propagation potential. An axonal response with implications for scalp-recorded EEG.

Authors:  A P Rudell; S E Fox
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Comparison of realistically shaped boundary-element and spherical head models in source localization of early somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  H Buchner; T D Waberski; M Fuchs; H A Wischmann; M Wagner; R Drenckhahn
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 7.  Identification of neural circuits underlying P300 abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Authors:  B F O'Donnell; R W McCarley; G F Potts; D F Salisbury; P G Nestor; Y Hirayasu; M A Niznikiewicz; J Barnard; Z J Shen; D M Weinstein; F L Bookstein; M E Shenton
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Dynamic imaging of ictal oscillations using non-invasive high-resolution EEG.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Christopher Wilke; Benjamin Brinkmann; Gregory A Worrell; Bin He
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Effect of EEG electrode number on epileptic source localization in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Abbas Sohrabpour; Yunfeng Lu; Pongkiat Kankirawatana; Jeffrey Blount; Hyunmi Kim; Bin He
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 10.  EEG source imaging in epilepsy--practicalities and pitfalls.

Authors:  Kitti Kaiboriboon; Hans O Lüders; Mehdi Hamaneh; John Turnbull; Samden D Lhatoo
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 42.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.