BACKGROUND: Central screw positioning in the scaphoid provides biomechanical advantages. METHODS: A prospective randomized study of six fluoroscopically guided and six electromagnetically navigated screw (ENS) placements was performed on human cadavers. Accuracy of screw position was determined. Intraoperative fluoroscopy exposure times, readjustments of drilling directions, complete restarts and complications were documented. RESULTS: The ENS method provided a mean time benefit of 7.34 min compared with the standard method and the mean screw length ratio (SLR coronar: ENS 0.96 ± 0.04 mm, SFF: 0.92 ± 0.04 mm, P = 0.065; SLR sagittal: ENS 0.98 ± 0.02 mm, SFF: 0.91 ± 0.04 mm, P = 0.009) and the screw axis deviation angle (AD coronar: ENS 3.33 ± 2.34°, SFF: 10.33 ± 2.58°, P = 0.002; AD sagittal: ENS 2.83 ± 0.98°, SFF: 11.00 ± 6.16°, P = 0.002) were lower. Using the electromagnetic navigation procedure no drilling readjustments or restarts were required, no cortical breach occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the standard fluoroscopic technique, the ENS method used in this study showed higher accuracy, less complications, required less operation and radiation exposure time.
BACKGROUND: Central screw positioning in the scaphoid provides biomechanical advantages. METHODS: A prospective randomized study of six fluoroscopically guided and six electromagnetically navigated screw (ENS) placements was performed on human cadavers. Accuracy of screw position was determined. Intraoperative fluoroscopy exposure times, readjustments of drilling directions, complete restarts and complications were documented. RESULTS: The ENS method provided a mean time benefit of 7.34 min compared with the standard method and the mean screw length ratio (SLR coronar: ENS 0.96 ± 0.04 mm, SFF: 0.92 ± 0.04 mm, P = 0.065; SLR sagittal: ENS 0.98 ± 0.02 mm, SFF: 0.91 ± 0.04 mm, P = 0.009) and the screw axis deviation angle (AD coronar: ENS 3.33 ± 2.34°, SFF: 10.33 ± 2.58°, P = 0.002; AD sagittal: ENS 2.83 ± 0.98°, SFF: 11.00 ± 6.16°, P = 0.002) were lower. Using the electromagnetic navigation procedure no drilling readjustments or restarts were required, no cortical breach occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the standard fluoroscopic technique, the ENS method used in this study showed higher accuracy, less complications, required less operation and radiation exposure time.
Authors: Miguel Pishnamaz; Christoph Wilkmann; Hong-Sik Na; Jochen Pfeffer; Christoph Hänisch; Max Janssen; Philipp Bruners; Philipp Kobbe; Frank Hildebrand; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Hans-Christoph Pape Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Oliver D Jungesblut; Josephine Berger-Groch; Michael Hoffmann; Malte Schroeder; Kara L Krajewski; Ralf Stuecker; Martin Rupprecht Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Philipp Honigmann; Maximilian Hofer; Sibylle Hirsch; Marta Morawska; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl; Florian M Thieringer; Enrico Coppo Journal: Int J Med Robot Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 2.483