| Literature DB >> 24675965 |
Marcello Mancini1, Roberta Lanzillo2, Raffaele Liuzzi3, Orlando Di Donato4, Monica Ragucci5, Serena Monti5, Elena Salvatore4, Vincenzo Brescia Morra2, Marco Salvatore4.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the Internal Jugular Veins dynamics using contrast enhanced ultrasonography in Multiple Sclerosis patients, clinically isolated syndrome patients and healthy controls. Contrast enhanced ultrasonography imaging of the Internal Jugular Vein was performed in fifty-eight patients with Multiple Sclerosis, seven clinically isolated syndrome patients and in thirteen healthy controls. Time-intensity curves were quantified using a semi-automated method and compared with clinical disease outcomes. Wash-out parameters were calculated and six Time-intensity curves shapes were created. Significantly reduction of wash-out rate in Internal Jugular Veins was detected in Multiple Sclerosis patients compared to healthy controls [22.2% (2.7%-65.9%) vs. 33.4% (16.2%-76.8%); P<0.005]. Internal Jugular Vein enhancement was heterogeneous in patients with Multiple Sclerosis and consisted of slow wash-out Time-intensity curves shapes, compared with almost only one type of Time-intensity curves shape in control subjects that correspond to fast enhancement and fast wash-out. The vein wash-in parameters were similar in Multiple Sclerosis group compared with controls. A significant correlation was found between Internal Jugular Vein wash-out and level of disability (R = -0.402, p<0.05). Contrast enhanced ultrasonography of the Internal Jugular Vein with time intensity curve analysis revealed alterations of cerebral venous outflow in Multiple Sclerosis patients, however mechanisms that determine this condition remains unclear.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24675965 PMCID: PMC3968019 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Graph of six time-intensity curves shape types (TIC).
Type 1 shows slow enhancement followed by wash out phase; type 2 fast enhancement followed by wash out phase; type 3 fast enhancement followed by plateau phase; type 4 fast enhancement followed by gradual enhancement increase; type 5 fast enhancement followed by a short time wash out and by a second peak of enhancement; type 6 unclassified enhancement. Type 1–2 TIC shapes were considered indicative of fast wash-out. Type 3-4-5 were considered indicative of a slow venous wash-out.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of HCs, CIS patients, all MS patients and MS subtypes patients.
| HCs | CIS | MS Patients | ||||||
| MS Subtypes | ||||||||
| Whole Group | p§ | RR | SP | PP | p* | |||
| No.of Subjects | 13 | 7 | 58 | 32 | 20 | 6 | ||
| M | 9 | 3 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 4 | ||
| F | 4 | 4 | 45 | 0.089 | 25 | 18 | 2 | |
| Age (y) | 35 | 33 | 41 | 0.002 | 35 | 43 | 49 | 0.001 |
| (23–54) | (27–41) | (25–60) | (25–54) | (27–55) | (35–60) | |||
| Onset age(y) | 27 | 29 | 0.336 | 26 | 31 | 36 | 0.061 | |
| (24–41) | (8–47) | (8–37) | (19–37) | (22–47) | ||||
| Disease duration (y) | 1 | 4 | <0,001 | 8 | 11 | 15 | 0.002 | |
| (0–7) | (2–7) | (1–31) | (2–30) | (6–18) | ||||
| EDSS | 2 | 4.2 | <0,001 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 6 | <0,001 | |
| (1,5–3,5) | (2–6,5) | (2,0–4,5) | (3,0–6,0) | (4,5–6,5) | ||||
| MSSS | 2 | 1.78 | <0,001 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 5.5 | <0,001 | |
| (1,5–3,5) | (0,13–12,76) | (2,0–4,5) | (4,0–6,0) | (4,5–6,5) | ||||
Data are expressed as median and range (in brackets). There were no statistically significant differences between HCs and MS patients in age (p = 0.721; 0.153) or sex (p = 0.148; 0.332). § Mann-Whitney U test between CIS and MS patients. * Kruskal Wallis one-way analysis of variance among MS patients.
HCs = healthy controls subjects; CIS = clinically isolated syndrome; MS = multiple sclerosis; MS Subtypes: RR = relapse remitting; SP = secondary progressive, PP = primary progressive.
Parameters of time intensity curve in Healthy Controls (HCs). CIS and patients with MS.
| HCs | CIS | MS patients | ||||||
| MS Subtypes | ||||||||
| Whole group |
| RR | SP | PP |
| |||
| IJV CSA supine (cm2) | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
|
| (0.4–2.1) | (0.3–1.3) | (0.1–3.4) | (0.1–2.2) | (0.1–3.4) | (0.1–2.3) | |||
|
| ||||||||
| Intensity Peak (dB) | 81.2 | 83.2 | 91.0 |
| 88.6 | 92.7 | 102.6 |
|
| (4.9–99.6) | (53.0–121.5) | (5.9–122.7) | (5.9–122.7) | (7–121.9) | (10.5–119.7) | |||
| Incremental Time (s) | 9.0 | 9.5 | 10.1 |
| 10.1 | 10.0 | 10.4 |
|
| (6.9–14.1) | (5.9–12.9) | (4.9–27.9) | (5.1–27.9) | (4.9–18.3) | (5.5–17.1) | |||
| Enhancement Slope (dB/s) | 8.7 | 10.1 | 8.6 |
| 8.8 | 8.0 | 8.7 |
|
| (0.7–12.6) | (5.1–15.9) | (0.6–21.0) | (0.6–18.5) | (1.4–13.7) | (1.7–21.0) | |||
| Time to Peak intensity (s) | 23.3 | 22.0 | 23.2 |
| 23.2 | 22.6 | 26.0 |
|
| (18.1–33.4) | (16.2–26.2) | (6.5–38.0) | (14.8–38.0) | (6.5–36.6) | (18.4–33.6) | |||
| AUC wash in (dBs) | 346 | 442 | 505 |
| 501.5 | 527.8 | 741 |
|
| (14–715) | (260–705) | (19–1725) | (29–1725) | (19–1166) | (26–957) | |||
|
| ||||||||
| Residual value (dB) | 53.9 | 57.2 | 70.4 |
| 66.8 | 72.0 | 85.5 |
|
| (1.5–72.1) | (34.8–98.4) | (70.4–114.2) | (3.7–114.2) | (4.3–101.3) | (4.3–105.0) | |||
| Wash-out rate (%) | 33.4 | 30.0 | 22.2 |
| 22.9 | 23.5 | 16.0 |
|
| (16.2–76.8) | (8.1–43.0) | (2.7–65.9) | (2.7–65.9) | (5.7–57.1) | (10.4–64.1) | |||
|
| 28.3 | 21.6 | 17.1 |
| 18.2 | 18.2 | 14.5 |
|
| (16.2–45.1) | (8.6–36.1) | (2.7–49.5) | (2.7–49.5) | (5.7–46.8) | (10.4–24.5) | |||
| AUC wash-out (dBs) | 2 241 | 2 617 | 2 701 |
| 2 701 | 2 630 | 3 136 |
|
| (78–3 010) | (1 437–4 167) | (109–4 537) | (109–4 537) | (266–4 424) | (246–3 938) | |||
* Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance.
All results are expressed for veins only the lower wash-out rate was evaluated for patients and calculated as the lowest value between the IJV for each patient.
Cross-correlation matrix coefficients.
| Age (y) | Age at onset (y) | disease duration (y) | EDSS | MSSS | total relapses (n) | relapses in the last 2 years | |
| IJV CSA (cm2) | 0.215 | 0.155 | 0.195 | 0.089 | 0.300* | −0.061 | 0.105 |
|
| |||||||
| Intensity Peak (dB) | 0.129 | 0.238 | −0.117 | 0.054 | −0.069 | 0.207 | −0.125 |
| Incremental Time (s) | 0.185 | 0.099 | 0.156 | 0.025 | −0.089 | −0.251 | 0.055 |
| Enhancement Slope (dB/s) | −0.027 | 0.187 | 0.256* | −0.074 | −0.115 | 0.247 | −0.160 |
| Time to Peak intensity (s) | 0.286* | 0.302* | 0.124 | 0.012 | 0.032 | −0.177 | 0.194 |
| AUC wash in (dBs) | 0.126 | 0.139 | 0.085 | 0.161 | −0.061 | 0.025 | −0.085 |
|
| |||||||
| Wash-out rate (%) | −0.067 | −0.204 | −0.005 | −0.038 | 0.044 | −0.137 | 0.065 |
|
| −0.135 | −0.346* | −0.082 | −0.402* | −0.252 | −0.120 | 0.024 |
| AUC wash-out (dBs) | −0.019 | 0.179 | −0.135 | 0.066 | −0.118 | 0.222 | −0.132 |
The numbers represents the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient value. * p<0.05.
Figure 2Frequency of Time intensity curve shapes in the different groups of subjects.
The curve shapes 1-2 corresponds to a fast wash-out. The curve shapes 3-5 corresponds to slow wash-out.