Literature DB >> 24674952

Cog-4 has limited diagnostic test accuracy and validity for cognitive assessment in stroke survivors.

Rosalind Lees1, Jane Lua2, Emily Melling2, Yen Miao2, Jia Tan2, Terence J Quinn3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend cognitive screening for all stroke survivors but do not suggest a preferred tool. Certain elements (orientation, executive function, language, and inattention) of the impairment scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), have been suggested as a short cognitive screening test-Cog-4. We aimed to describe accuracy and validity of Cog-4 against a more detailed cognitive assessment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]).
METHODS: We assessed consecutive acute stroke unit admissions in 2 hospitals over 3 months. Four independent blinded assessors performed NIHSS and MoCA between days 1 and 4 poststroke. We described test properties of Cog-4 for MoCA-defined cognitive impairment using usual thresholds (Cog-4≥1 and MoCA<26 of 30) and described the correlations of individual Cog-4 components with broadly equivalent MoCA domains.
RESULTS: We assessed 173 participants; 166 had Cog-4 data and 148 MoCA. MoCA described 84% (n=124) of assessed participants as having cognitive impairment and the Cog-4, 37% (n=62). Cog-4 had a sensitivity of .36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: .28-.45) and a specificity of .96 (95% CI: .80-.99) (positive predictive value: .98, negative predictive value: .23) for MoCA-defined cognitive impairment. Individual Cog-4 items correlated with certain MoCA domains, but the strength of association was modest (r=-.44 orientation, -.37 language, -.19 for inattention, and no significant correlation for executive function, P=.72).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that many stroke survivors with MoCA-defined cognitive problems would not be detected by Cog-4. Subtest correlations suggest that Cog-4 may not be a valid measure of the cognitive domains that it purports to describe. Other brief cognitive screening tests may be better suited to acute stroke.
Copyright © 2014 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cog-4; Cognitive impairment; MoCA; scales; screening; sensitivity; specificity; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24674952     DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.12.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1052-3057            Impact factor:   2.136


  4 in total

1.  Leukoaraiosis is Associated with Worse Short-Term Functional and Cognitive Recovery after Minor Stroke.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Wenwei Ren; Bei Shao; Huiqin Xu; Jianhua Cheng; Qiongzhang Wang; Yingying Gu; Beilei Zhu; Jincai He
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Feasibility of Cognitive Functions Screened With the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Determining ADL Dependence Early After Stroke.

Authors:  Tamar Abzhandadze; Lena Rafsten; Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson; Katharina S Sunnerhagen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Psychometric properties of cognitive screening for patients with cerebrovascular diseases A systematic review.

Authors:  Jaqueline de Carvalho Rodrigues; Natália Becker; Carolina Luísa Beckenkamp; Camila Schorr Miná; Jerusa Fumagalli de Salles; Denise Ruschel Bandeira
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

4.  NIHSS is not enough for cognitive screening in acute stroke: A cross-sectional, retrospective study.

Authors:  Tamar Abzhandadze; Malin Reinholdsson; Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.