Literature DB >> 24674928

Use of a daily goals checklist for morning ICU rounds: a mixed-methods study.

John Eugenio Centofanti1, Erick H Duan, Neala C Hoad, Marilyn E Swinton, Dan Perri, Lily Waugh, Deborah J Cook.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand the perspectives and attitudes of ICU clinicians about use of a daily goals checklist on rounds.
DESIGN: Our three data collection methods were as follows: (1) Field observations: two investigators conducted field observations to understand how and by whom the daily goals checklist was used for 80 ICU patient rounds over 6 days. (2) Document analysis: The 72 completed daily goals checklists from observed rounds were analyzed using mixed methods. (3) Interviews: With 56 clinicians, we conducted semistructured individual and focus-group interviews, analyzing transcripts using a qualitative descriptive approach and content analysis. Triangulation was achieved by a multidisciplinary investigative team using two research methods and three data sources.
SETTING: Fifteen bed closed ICU in a tertiary care, university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Medical-surgical ICU patients.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Field observations: The daily goals checklist was completed for 93% of observed rounds, largely by residents (86%). The champion of the verbal review was commonly a resident (83%) or medical student (9%). Document analysis: Domains with high completion rates included ventilation, sedation, central venous access, nutrition, and various prophylactic interventions. Interviews: The daily goals checklist enhanced communication, patient care, and education. Nurses, physicians, and pharmacists endorsed its enhancement of interdisciplinary communication. It facilitated a structured, thorough, and individualized approach to patient care. The daily goals checklist helped to identify new patient care issues and sparked management discussions, especially for sedation, weaning, and medications. Residents were prominent users, finding served as a multipurpose teaching tool.
CONCLUSIONS: The daily goals checklist was perceived to improve the management of critically ill patients by creating a systematic, comprehensive approach to patient care and by setting individualized daily goals. Reportedly improving interprofessional communication and practice, the daily goals checklist also enhanced patient safety and daily progress, encouraging momentum in recovery from critical illness. Daily goals checklist review prompted teaching opportunities for multidisciplinary learners on morning rounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24674928     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  15 in total

1.  Daily goals: not just another piece of paper*.

Authors:  Nishi Rawat; Sean Berenholtz
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 2.  Communication, Leadership, and Decision-Making in the Neuro-ICU.

Authors:  Stephen Trevick; Minjee Kim; Andrew Naidech
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Feasibility and utility of the use of real time random safety audits in adult ICU patients: a multicentre study.

Authors:  M Bodí; M Olona; M C Martín; R Alceaga; J C Rodríguez; E Corral; J M Pérez Villares; G Sirgo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  eSIMPLER: A Dynamic, Electronic Health Record-Integrated Checklist for Clinical Decision Support During PICU Daily Rounds.

Authors:  Alon Geva; Ben D Albert; Susan Hamilton; Mary-Jeanne Manning; Megan K Barrett; Dimple Mirchandani; Matthew Harty; Erin C Morgan; Monica E Kleinman; Nilesh M Mehta
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.971

5.  Patient- and family-centered performance measures focused on actionable processes of care for persistent and chronic critical illness: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Louise Rose; Laura Istanboulian; Laura Allum; Lisa Burry; Craig Dale; Nicholas Hart; Claire Kydonaki; Pam Ramsay; Natalie Pattison; Bronwen Connolly
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

6.  Standardising care in the ICU: a protocol for a scoping review of tools used to improve care delivery.

Authors:  Laura Allum; Chloe Apps; Nicholas Hart; Natalie Pattison; Bronwen Connolly; Louise Rose
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-19

7.  Convergent parallel mixed-methods study to understand information exchange in paediatric critical care and inform the development of safety-enhancing interventions: a protocol study.

Authors:  Jessica Tomasi; Carly Warren; Lauren Kolodzey; Sonia Pinkney; Anne-Marie Guerguerian; Roxanne Kirsch; Jackie Hubbert; Christina Sperling; Patricia Sutton; Peter Laussen; Patricia Trbovich
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Patient and Family Centered Actionable Processes of Care and Performance Measures for Persistent and Chronic Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Louise Rose; Laura Istanboulian; Laura Allum; Lisa Burry; Craig Dale; Nicholas Hart; Kalliopi Kydonaki; Pam Ramsay; Natalie Pattison; Bronwen Connolly
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2019-04-17

9.  Testing the implementation of an electronic process-of-care checklist for use during morning medical rounds in a tertiary intensive care unit: a prospective before-after study.

Authors:  Karena M Conroy; Doug Elliott; Anthony R Burrell
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  A Survey of Rounding Practices in Canadian Adult Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Jessalyn K Holodinsky; Marilynne A Hebert; David A Zygun; Romain Rigal; Simon Berthelot; Deborah J Cook; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.