Literature DB >> 24674858

Effect of change in fluid distribution in segments in hemodialysis patients at different ultrafiltration rates on accuracy of whole body bioimpedance measurement.

Samer R Abbas1, Fansan Zhu2, George A Kaysen3, Peter Kotanko1, Nathan W Levin1.   

Abstract

This study explored divergence (error) between ultrafiltration volumes (UFV) and intradialytic changes in extracellular volume (ΔECV) in hemodialysis (HD) patients measured by whole body (wBIS) and sum of segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (sBIS). The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of different ultrafiltration rates (UFR) on error of estimation of ΔECV by changes in their distribution in body segments (arm, trunk, and leg). Forty-four HD patients (26 men, age 63.5 ± 14.3 yr) were studied twice in the same week following high and low UFR treatments. ΔECV and distributions (segmental ΔECV/Σsegmental ΔECV, %) in arm, trunk, and leg were measured. ΔECV by wBIS underestimated UFV (0.58 ± 0.43 in high vs. 0.36 ± 0.5 liters at low UFR; P < 0.001, respectively); however, using sBIS no significant difference between UFV and ΔECV was present. Divergence using wBIS but not sBIS correlated positively with UFR. ΔECV distribution in trunk and leg at high UFR (44.1 ± 8.3, 47.2 ± 8.5, %) differed significantly (P < 0.01) from low UFR (36 ± 15.7, 53.8 ± 14.7) respectively, but in arm did not differ between UFR. Primary sources of whole body resistance are arms and legs. Due to different cross-sectional areas between trunk and limbs, wBIS is insensitive to detection of changes in trunk volume. At higher UFR, plasma water was rapidly and largely removed from the trunk but with only a small change in whole body resistance. As a result, accuracy of estimation of ECV by wBIS is further decreased by high UFR, while sBIS remains accurate using separate measurements of segmental volumes.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extracellular volume; hemodialysis; segmental bioimpedance; ultrafiltration rate; whole body bioimpedance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24674858     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01361.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  5 in total

1.  Agreement of single- and multi-frequency bioimpedance measurements in hemodialysis patients: an ancillary study of the Frequent Hemodialysis Network Daily Trial.

Authors:  Jochen G Raimann; Samer R Abbas; Li Liu; Fansan Zhu; Brett Larive; Peter Kotanko; Nathan W Levin; George A Kaysen
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2014-11-07

2.  Changes in body composition following haemodialysis as assessed by bioimpedance spectroscopy.

Authors:  K Tangvoraphonkchai; A Davenport
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  The Body Composition Monitor: a flexible tool for routine fluid management across the haemodialysis population.

Authors:  D F Keane; P Baxter; E Lindley; U Moissl; S Pavitt; L Rhodes; S Wieskotten
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2017-05-25

4.  Knee-to-knee Bioimpedance Measurements to Monitor Changes in Extracellular Fluid in Haemodynamic-unstable Patients During Dialysis.

Authors:  Abdul Hamid Ismail; Georg Schlieper; Marian Walter; Jürgen Floege; Steffen Leonhardt
Journal:  J Electr Bioimpedance       Date:  2019-08-20

5.  Characteristics of bioimpedance-determined fluid shifts according to intradialytic blood pressure difference.

Authors:  Young Eun Kwon; Hye Min Choi; Dong-Jin Oh
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.606

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.