Literature DB >> 24673875

Influence of Vertical Soft Tissue Thickness on Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants with Platform Switching: A Comparative Clinical Study.

Tomas Linkevicius1,2,3, Algirdas Puisys2,3, Marius Steigmann4, Egle Vindasiute2,3, Laura Linkeviciene1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown the superiority of platform-switched implants in preserving crestal bone as compared with platform-matched implants. However, the influence of initial soft tissue thickness on development of crestal bone loss has not been addressed in previous studies; thus, further research is needed.
PURPOSE: To evaluate crestal bone levels around platform-switched implants placed in thin and thick mucosal tissue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients (38 male and 42 female, mean age 44 ± 3.34 years) received 80 bone-level implants of 4.1 mm in diameter with platform switching (Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland). Tissue thickness was measured, and cases were distributed to Group 1, with thin soft tissue (2 mm or less, n = 40), and Group 2, with thick tissue (more than 2 mm, n = 40). Implants were placed with a one-stage approach and restored with screw-retained restorations. Radiographic examination was performed after implant placement, 2 months after healing, after restoration, and at 1-year follow-up post-reconstruction. Crestal bone loss was calculated. The Mann-Whitney U-test was applied, and significance was set to p ≤ .05.
RESULTS: Implants in Group 1 (thin tissue) showed 0.79 mm of bone loss after 2 months. After 1-year follow-up, bone loss was 1.17 mm. Implants in Group 2 (thick tissue) showed bone loss of 0.17 mm after 2 months of implant placement and 0.21 mm after 1-year follow-up. The differences between groups were significant (p < .001) at both time points.
CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that platform switching does not prevent crestal bone loss if, at the time of implant placement, mucosal tissue is thin. In thick soft tissue, use of platform-switched implants maintained crestal bone level with minimal remodeling.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical study; crestal bone loss; implant design

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24673875     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  22 in total

Review 1.  Soft tissue augmentation procedures at second-stage surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Renzo G Bassetti; Alexandra Stähli; Mario A Bassetti; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Variations in vertical mucosal thickness at edentulous ridge according to site and gender measured by cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Motohiro Munakata; Koudai Nagata; Minoru Sanda; Ryota Kawamata; Daisuke Sato; Kikue Yamaguchi
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-05-12

3.  Comprehensive peri-implant tissue evaluation with ultrasonography and cone-beam computed tomography: A pilot study.

Authors:  Rafael Siqueira; Khaled Sinjab; Ying-Chun Pan; Fabiana Soki; Hsun-Liang Chan; Oliver Kripfgans
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 5.021

4.  Hard and soft tissue healing around implants with a modified implant neck configuration: An experimental in vivo preclinical investigation.

Authors:  David Palombo; Maryam Rahmati; Fabio Vignoletti; Javier Sanz-Esporrin; Håvard Jostein Haugen; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 5.021

5.  The effect of PRF (platelet-rich fibrin) inserted with a split-flap technique on soft tissue thickening and initial marginal bone loss around implants: results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Julia Hehn; Thomas Schwenk; Markus Striegel; Markus Schlee
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 6.  Diagnostic Principles of Peri-Implantitis: a Systematic Review and Guidelines for Peri-Implantitis Diagnosis Proposal.

Authors:  Ausra Ramanauskaite; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09

7.  The dome technique: a new surgical technique to enhance soft-tissue margins and emergence profiles around implants placed in the esthetic zone.

Authors:  Tassos Irinakis; Salwa Aldahlawi
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-02-14

8.  All-ceramic versus titanium-based implant supported restorations: Preliminary 12-months results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paul Weigl; Georgia Trimpou; Eleftherios Grizas; Pablo Hess; Georg-Hubertus Nentwig; Hans-Christoph Lauer; Jonas Lorenz
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Immediate Post-Extraction Short Implant Placement with Immediate Loading and without Extraction of an Impacted Maxillary Canine: Two Case Reports.

Authors:  José Antonio Moreno-Rodríguez; Julia Guerrero-Gironés; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Lozano; Miguel Ramón Pecci-Lloret
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments.

Authors:  Sven Marcus Beschnidt; Claudio Cacaci; Kerem Dedeoglu; Detlef Hildebrand; Helfried Hulla; Gerhard Iglhaut; Gerald Krennmair; Markus Schlee; Paul Sipos; Andres Stricker; Karl-Ludwig Ackermann
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.