Literature DB >> 24673862

The challenge of maximizing safety in radiation oncology.

Lawrence B Marks1, Marianne Jackson2, Liyi Xie3, Sha X Chang2, Katharin Deschesne Burkhardt2, Lukasz Mazur4, Ellen L Jones2, Patricia Saponaro2, Dana Lachapelle2, Dee C Baynes2, Robert D Adams2.   

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the evolving nature of safety challenges in radiation oncology. Understandably, there has been a great deal of focus on the mechanical and computer aspects of new high-technology treatments (eg, intensity-modulated radiation therapy). However, safety concerns are not limited to dose calculations and data transfer associated with advanced technologies. They also stem from fundamental changes in our workflow (eg, multiple hand-offs), the relative loss of some traditional "end of the line" quality assurance tools (port films and light fields), condensed fractionation schedules, and an under-appreciation for the physical limitations of new techniques. Furthermore, changes in our workspace and tools (eg, electronic records, planning systems), and workloads (eg, billing, insurance, regulations) may have unforeseen effects on safety. Safety initiatives need to acknowledge the multiple factors affecting risk. Our current challenges will not be adequately addressed simply by defining new policies and procedures. Rather, we need to understand the frequency and causes of errors better, particularly those that are most likely to cause harm. Then we can incorporate principles into our workspace that minimize these risks (eg, automation, standardization, checklists, redundancy, and consideration of "human factors" in the design of products and workspaces). Opportunities to enhance safety involve providing support through diligent examinations of staffing, schedules, communications, teamwork, and work environments. We need to develop a culture of safety in which all team members are alerted to the possibility of harm, and they all work together to maximize safety. The goal is not to eliminate every error. Rather, we should focus our attention on conditions (eg, rushing) that can cause real patient harm, and/or those conditions that reflect systemic problems that might lead to errors more likely to cause harm. Ongoing changes in clinical practice mandate continued vigilance to minimize the risks of error, combined with new, nontraditional approaches to create a safer patient environment. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 24673862     DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2010.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1879-8500


  12 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing Career Paths for Tomorrow's Radiation Oncologists.

Authors:  Neha Vapiwala; Charles R Thomas; Surbhi Grover; Mei Ling Yap; Timur Mitin; Lawrence N Shulman; Mary K Gospodarowicz; John Longo; Daniel G Petereit; Ronald D Ennis; James A Hayman; Danielle Rodin; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Bhadrasain Vikram; May Abdel-Wahab; Alan H Epstein; Paul Okunieff; Joel Goldwein; Patrick Kupelian; Joanne B Weidhaas; Margaret A Tucker; John D Boice; Clifton David Fuller; Reid F Thompson; Andrew D Trister; Silvia C Formenti; Mary-Helen Barcellos-Hoff; Joshua Jones; Kavita V Dharmarajan; Anthony L Zietman; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Huddling for high reliability and situation awareness.

Authors:  Linda M Goldenhar; Patrick W Brady; Kathleen M Sutcliffe; Stephen E Muething
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 3.  Automated Plan Checking Software Demonstrates Continuous and Sustained Improvements in Safety and Quality: A 3-year Longitudinal Analysis.

Authors:  Delaney Stuhr; Ying Zhou; Hai Pham; Jian-Ping Xiong; Shi Liu; James G Mechalakos; Sean L Berry
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-10-17

4.  Impact of Simulation-Based Training on Radiation Therapists' Workload, Situation Awareness, and Performance.

Authors:  Lukasz M Mazur; Robert Adams; Prithima R Mosaly; Marjorie P Stiegler; Joseph Nuamah; Karthik Adapa; Bhishamjit Chera; Lawrence B Marks
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-09-29

5.  Right Care for the Right Patient Each and Every Time.

Authors:  Amar Basavatia; Jose Fret; Alex Lukaj; Hsiang Kuo; Ravindra Yaparpalvi; Wolfgang A Tome; Shalom Kalnicki
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-02-12

6.  Clinical practice workflow in Radiation Oncology should be highly standardized.

Authors:  Per Halvorsen; Nilendu Gupta; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Patient safety in an environment of rapidly advancing technology in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Chandra Prakash Joshi
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2014-04

8.  Guidelines for treatment naming in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Travis R Denton; Lisa B E Shields; Michael Hahl; Casey Maudlin; Mark Bassett; Aaron C Spalding
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  Promoting safety mindfulness: Recommendations for the design and use of simulation-based training in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Lukasz M Mazur; Lawrence B Marks; Ron McLeod; Waldemar Karwowski; Prithima Mosaly; Gregg Tracton; Robert D Adams; Lesley Hoyle; Shiva Das; Bhishamjit Chera
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-02-07

10.  Accurate real time localization tracking in a clinical environment using Bluetooth Low Energy and deep learning.

Authors:  Zohaib Iqbal; Da Luo; Peter Henry; Samaneh Kazemifar; Timothy Rozario; Yulong Yan; Kenneth Westover; Weiguo Lu; Dan Nguyen; Troy Long; Jing Wang; Hak Choy; Steve Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.