Literature DB >> 24673658

Dentofacial characteristics in orthodontic patients with centric relation-maximum intercuspation discrepancy.

Won Hee Lim1, Byungtaek Choi, Jeong-Yun Lee, Sug-Joon Ahn.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To investigate dentofacial characteristics of orthodontic patients with centric relation (CR)-maximum intercuspation (MI) discrepancy and to analyze changes in dentofacial characteristics between CR and MI positions in these patients using lateral cephalograms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult female patients were classified into two groups: large CR-MI discrepancy (greater than 2.0 mm horizontal or vertical mandibular incisor movements during CR to MI change, n  =  20) and small CR-MI discrepancy (less than 1.0 mm horizontal and vertical mandibular incisor movements during CR to MI change, n  =  22). All subjects underwent temporomandibular joint (TMJ) magnetic resonance imaging prior to treatment. Gnathological stabilizing splints were used to find a reliable CR position in patients with large CR-MI discrepancy. Sixteen variables from lateral cephalograms were analyzed to identify differences in cephalometric variables between CR and MI positions in patients with large discrepancy. Differences in dentofacial cephalometric variables at MI positions between patients with large and small CR-MI discrepancies were also analyzed.
RESULTS: Patients with large CR-MI discrepancy had backward positioning and rotation of the mandible at the MI position compared to the norm. In addition, the mandible moved more posteriorly and rotated more in a clockwise direction during MI to CR change. Interestingly, all patients with large CR-MI discrepancy had TMJ disk displacement. There were no significant differences in the cephalometric variables of the MI positions between patients with small and large CR-MI discrepancies.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that adult patients with backward positioning and rotation of the mandible should be carefully evaluated as a result of the potential CR-MI discrepancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centric relation; Maximum intercuspation; Orthodontic patients

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24673658      PMCID: PMC8638492          DOI: 10.2319/123013-949.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  19 in total

Review 1.  Condylar axis position, as determined by the occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.

Authors:  S D Crawford
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Quantification and validation of predictive values of occlusal variables in temporomandibular disorders using a multifactorial analysis.

Authors:  A G Pullinger; D A Seligman
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Increase of condylar displacement between centric relation and maximal habitual intercuspation after occlusal splint therapy.

Authors:  Solange Mongelli de Fantini; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino Neto; Gladys Cristina Dominguez; Jorge Abrão; Júlio Wilson Vigoritto
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2005-11-21

4.  The glossary of prosthodontic terms.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  The reproducibility of centric relation: a clinical approach.

Authors:  G J Tarantola; I M Becker; H Gremillion
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  Centrically related cephalometrics.

Authors:  C R Wood
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1977-02

7.  Clinical and instrumental functional analysis and treatment planning. Part 4. Instrumental analysis of mandibular casts using the mandibular position indicator.

Authors:  R Slavicek
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1988-09

8.  Prevalence of mandibular dysfunction in young adults.

Authors:  W K Solberg; M W Woo; J B Houston
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  A multiple logistic regression analysis of the risk and relative odds of temporomandibular disorders as a function of common occlusal features.

Authors:  A G Pullinger; D A Seligman; J A Gornbein
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.116

10.  The CR-CO discrepancy and its effect on cephalometric measurements.

Authors:  M Shildkraut; D P Wood; W S Hunter
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Research progress on the relationship between centric relation and orthodontic treatment].

Authors:  Dian Jing; Yu Shen; Pu Yang; Zhi-He Zhao
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-10-01

2.  The Role of Maxillofacial Structure on Condylar Displacement in Maximum Intercuspation and Centric Relation.

Authors:  Ilona Radej; Izabela Szarmach
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  The Law of Minimum Vertical Dimension: Evidence for Improvement of Dental Occlusion.

Authors:  Silvana Silveira; Patricia Valerio; Almiro J Machado Júnior
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-10-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.