Literature DB >> 24673143

Motion compensation for in vivo subcellular optical microscopy.

B Lucotte1, R S Balaban1.   

Abstract

In this review, we focus on the impact of tissue motion on attempting to conduct subcellular resolution optical microscopy, in vivo. Our position is that tissue motion is one of the major barriers in conducting these studies along with light induced damage, optical probe loading as well as absorbing and scattering effects on the excitation point spread function and collection of emitted light. Recent developments in the speed of image acquisition have reached the limit, in most cases, where the signal from a subcellular voxel limits the speed and not the scanning rate of the microscope. Different schemes for compensating for tissue displacements due to rigid body and deformation are presented from tissue restriction, gating, adaptive gating and active tissue tracking. We argue that methods that minimally impact the natural physiological motion of the tissue are desirable because the major reason to perform in vivo studies is to evaluate normal physiological functions. Towards this goal, active tracking using the optical imaging data itself to monitor tissue displacement and either prospectively or retrospectively correct for the motion without affecting physiological processes is desirable. Critical for this development was the implementation of near real time image processing in conjunction with the control of the microscope imaging parameters. Clearly, the continuing development of methods of motion compensation as well as significant technological solutions to the other barriers to tissue subcellular optical imaging in vivo, including optical aberrations and overall signal-to-noise ratio, will make major contributions to the understanding of cell biology within the body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24673143      PMCID: PMC4229363          DOI: 10.1111/jmi.12116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microsc        ISSN: 0022-2720            Impact factor:   1.758


  21 in total

1.  Orderly recruitment of motor units under optical control in vivo.

Authors:  Michael E Llewellyn; Kimberly R Thompson; Karl Deisseroth; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Fast three-dimensional fluorescence imaging of activity in neural populations by objective-coupled planar illumination microscopy.

Authors:  Terrence F Holekamp; Diwakar Turaga; Timothy E Holy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Real-time background-free selective imaging of fluorescent nanodiamonds in vivo.

Authors:  Ryuji Igarashi; Yohsuke Yoshinari; Hiroaki Yokota; Takuma Sugi; Fuminori Sugihara; Kazuhiro Ikeda; Hitoshi Sumiya; Shigenori Tsuji; Ikue Mori; Hidehito Tochio; Yoshie Harada; Masahiro Shirakawa
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  High-resolution three-photon biomedical imaging using doped ZnS nanocrystals.

Authors:  Jung Ho Yu; Seung-Hae Kwon; Zdeněk Petrášek; Ok Kyu Park; Samuel Woojoo Jun; Kwangsoo Shin; Moonkee Choi; Yong Il Park; Kyeongsoon Park; Hyon Bin Na; Nohyun Lee; Dong Won Lee; Jeong Hyun Kim; Petra Schwille; Taeghwan Hyeon
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 43.841

5.  Ultrafast optical wide field microscopy.

Authors:  M Seo; S Boubanga-Tombet; J Yoo; Z Ku; A V Gin; S T Picraux; S R J Brueck; A J Taylor; R P Prasankumar
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 6.  Challenges in small animal noninvasive imaging.

Authors:  R S Balaban; V A Hampshire
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2001

7.  Improved ejection fraction and flow velocity estimates with use of view sharing and uniform repetition time excitation with fast cardiac techniques.

Authors:  T K Foo; M A Bernstein; A M Aisen; R J Hernandez; B D Collick; T Bernstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Short communication: Subcellular motion compensation for minimally invasive microscopy, in vivo: evidence for oxygen gradients in resting muscle.

Authors:  James L Schroeder; Merav Luger-Hamer; Randall Pursley; Tom Pohida; Chris Chefd'hotel; Peter Kellman; Robert S Balaban
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Three-dimensional motion tracking for high-resolution optical microscopy, in vivo.

Authors:  Matthew Bakalar; James L Schroeder; Randall Pursley; Thomas J Pohida; Brian Glancy; Joni Taylor; David Chess; Peter Kellman; Hui Xue; Robert S Balaban
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Advanced Motion Compensation Methods for Intravital Optical Microscopy.

Authors:  Claudio Vinegoni; Sungon Lee; Paolo Fumene Feruglio; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.544

View more
  3 in total

1.  Use of independent component analysis to improve signal-to-noise ratio in multi-probe fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  L Dao; B Lucotte; B Glancy; L-C Chang; L-Y Hsu; R S Balaban
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 1.758

2.  Analyzing Structure and Function of Vascularization in Engineered Bone Tissue by Video-Rate Intravital Microscopy and 3D Image Processing.

Authors:  Yonggang Pang; Olga Tsigkou; Joel A Spencer; Charles P Lin; Craig Neville; Brian Grottkau
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 3.  Multiphoton intravital microscopy in small animals: motion artefact challenges and technical solutions.

Authors:  D Soulet; J Lamontagne-Proulx; B Aubé; D Davalos
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 1.758

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.