| Literature DB >> 24672788 |
Dengfeng Liu1, Hong-Tao Zhang2, Weili Xiong1, Jianhua Hu3, Baoguo Xu1, Chi-Chung Lin2, Ling Xu1, Lihua Jiang1.
Abstract
Production of high quality Chinese rice wine largely depends on fermentation temperature. However, there is no report on the ethanol, sugars, and acids kinetics in the fermentation mash of Chinese rice wine treated at various temperatures. The effects of fermentation temperatures on Chinese rice wine quality were investigated. The compositions and concentrations of ethanol, sugars, glycerol, and organic acids in the mash of Chinese rice wine samples were determined by HPLC method. The highest ethanol concentration and the highest glycerol concentration both were attained at the fermentation mash treated at 23 °C. The highest peak value of maltose (90 g/L) was obtained at 18 °C. Lactic acid and acetic acid both achieved maximum values at 33 °C. The experimental results indicated that temperature contributed significantly to the ethanol production, acid flavor contents, and sugar contents in the fermentation broth of the Chinese rice wines.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24672788 PMCID: PMC3929989 DOI: 10.1155/2014/426929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Ethanol concentration (%, v/v ± SD) under various temperatures.
| Temperature | RT | 18°C | 23°C | 28°C | 33°C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethanol (%, v/v) | 11.2 ± 0.27 | 9.8 ± 0.12 | 12.2 ± 0.2 | 10.4 ± 0.3 | 3.6 ± 0.19 |
Figure 1The profiles of ethanol concentration under various temperatures.
Effect of various temperatures on the ethanol concentration (%, v/v ± SD) at different stages.
| Temperature | Ethanol production (%, v/v ) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–14 h | 14–24 h | 24–37 h | 37–47 h | 47–57 h | 57–74 h | 74–96 h | 96–140 h | |
| RT | 0.83 ± 0.04 | 1.02 ± 0.02 | 2.77 ± 0.21 | 1.28 ± 0.05 | 2.49 ± 0.08 | 1.44 ± 0.11 | 0.7 ± 0.08 | 0.6 ± 0.09 |
| 18°C | 0.61 ± 0.00 | 0.65 ± 0 | 1.4 ± 0.22 | 0.99 ± 0.07 | 1.08 ± 0.05 | 1.64 ± 0 | 1.34 ± 0.11 | 2.04 ± 0.21 |
| 23°C | 0.98 ± 0.03 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 1.95 ± 0.01 | 1.68 ± 0.04 | 3.47 ± 0.33 | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 1.72 ± 0.08 | 0.41 ± 0.1 |
| 28°C | 1.18 ± 0.00 | 1.66 ± 0.03 | 2.58 ± 0.16 | 1.88 ± 0.13 | 1.57 ± 0.09 | 1.01 ± 0.06 | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 0.01 ± 0.03 |
| 33°C | 2 ± 0.06 | 1.41 ± 0.03 | 0.02 ± 0.16 | 0 ± 0.03 | 0.02 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.04 | −0.07 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.03 |
Figure 2Time course of changes in productive concentration of sugars and glycerol under various temperatures: (a) glycerol, (b) fructose, (c) maltotriose, (d) maltose, and (e) glucose.
Figure 3Time course of changes in the concentration of organic acids under various temperatures: (a) succinic acid, (b) lactic acid, (c) acetic acid, (d) pyruvate acid, (e) malic acid, and (f) tartaric acid.
Effect of changing temperature on lactic acid concentration (g/L ± SD) at different stages.
| Temperature | Lactic acid concentration (g/L) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–14 h | 14–24 h | 24–37 h | 37–47 h | 47–57 h | 57–74 h | 74–96 h | 96–140 h | |
| RT | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 1.92 ± 0.01 | 1.13 ± 0.08 | 1.2 ± 0.07 | −0.18 ± 0.09 | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.85 ± 0.02 |
| 18°C | 0.57 ± 0.31 | −0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 1.57 ± 0.03 | −1.15 ± 0.01 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 1.58 ± 0.03 | 0.5 ± 0.06 |
| 23°C | 0.61 ± 0.11 | −0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.67 ± 0.03 | 4.41 ± 0.01 | −1.6 ± 0.01 | 1.25 ± 0.03 | −0.01 ± 0.06 |
| 28°C | 1.08 ± 0.28 | 2.38 ± 0.04 | 2.56 ± 0.00 | 0.09 ± 0.00 | −0.17 ± 0.02 | 0 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.01 ± 0.01 |
| 33°C | 0.86 ± 0.01 | 1.81 ± 0.07 | 11.05 ± 0.79 | 1.58 ± 0.15 | 1.47 ± 0.26 | 8.21 ± 0.22 | −1.55 ± 0.59 | 6.79 ± 0.06 |