| Literature DB >> 24672384 |
Gargi Pal1, Gautam Aditya2, Niladri Hazra1.
Abstract
Indirect interactions among community members impact on organisms. The effects of two snails, banded pond snail, Bellamya bengalensis (Lamarck), and Red-rimmed melania, Melanoides tuberculata (Müller), and tadpoles of Asian common toad, Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Schneider), on nonbiting midge larvae, Chironomus striatipennis Kieffer, were observed in experimental microcosm. Decrease in tube number and tube length of midge larvae was observed compared to control condition due to introduction of selected above mentioned organisms. The direct effects of non-predator organisms on the midge larvae are due to physical disturbance that destroys their tubes. This may result in vulnerability of midge larvae to predators in the wild. So the community structure may be altered by indirect effects, where one or more species, through their direct disturbance, indirectly change the abundance of other species.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24672384 PMCID: PMC3930191 DOI: 10.1155/2014/850782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Flow chart explaining the chronology of the experimental design.
Figure 2A typical “Bunty tub” used in the experiments, elaborating the “quadrats” from top view. The dashed lines represent the threads attached to the edges of the tub, so that from top view each quadrat (rectangular in shape—10.7 × 10 cm2) can be differentiated.
Figure 3Changes in the tube numbers of the developing chironomid larvae in the quadrats due to the activity of snails and tadpoles (closed circles) and control (without non-predators, bar) microcosms.
Figure 4Changes in mean tube length of the developing chironomid larvae in the quadrats in the presence of snails and tadpoles (filled triangles) and control (without non-predators, bar) microcosms.
(a)
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microcosms (TRAY) | 1089.6 | 6 | 181.60 | 9.26 | 0.001 |
| Non-predator species (SP) | 4198.9 | 2 | 2099.44 | 107.08 | 0.001 |
| Density (DEN) | 155.25 | 2 | 77.62 | 3.96 | 0.020 |
| TRAY∗SP | 1097.5 | 12 | 91.46 | 4.66 | 0.001 |
| TRAY∗DEN | 808.31 | 12 | 67.36 | 3.44 | 0.001 |
| SP∗DEN | 697.02 | 4 | 174.25 | 8.89 | 0.001 |
| TRAY∗SP∗DEN | 852.26 | 24 | 35.51 | 1.81 | 0.010 |
| Error | 13587 | 693 | 19.61 | ||
|
| |||||
| Total | 22486 | 755 | |||
(b) Multiple comparisons between non-predator species. The Tukey HSD with standard error 0.394; df = 251,2
| ( | ( | | | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | T | 5.631 | 0.001 |
| B | TH | 1.7143 | 0.001 |
| T | TH | −3.917 | 0.001 |
(c) Multiple comparisons between density of non-predators. The Tukey HSD with standard error 0.394471; df = 251,2
| ( | ( | | | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4 | −1.044 | 0.02 |
| 2 | 8 | −0.194 | 0.87 |
| 4 | 8 | 0.8492 | 0.08 |
T: tadpoles; B: B. bengalensis; TH: T. tuberculata.
(a)
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-predator species (SP) | 119725 | 2 | 59862.30 | 44.93 | 0.00 |
| Density (DEN) | 2288.1 | 2 | 1144.05 | 0.86 | 0.42 |
| AREA (QUAD) | 59067 | 11 | 5369.70 | 4.03 | 0.00 |
| SP∗DEN | 10044 | 4 | 2511.11 | 1.88 | 0.11 |
| SP∗QUAD | 31371 | 22 | 1425.94 | 1.07 | 0.37 |
| DEN∗QUAD | 10645 | 22 | 483.87 | 0.36 | 1.00 |
| SP∗DEN∗QUAD | 38184 | 44 | 867.82 | 0.65 | 0.96 |
| Error | 863371 | 648 | 1332.36 | ||
|
| |||||
| Total | 1134695.1 | 755 | |||
SP.: species, QUAD: quadrat.
(b) Multiple comparisons between non-predator species. The Tukey HSD with standard error 3.252; df = 251,2
| SP ( | SP ( | | | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | T | −30.44 | 0.001 |
| B | TH | −19.44 | 0.001 |
| T | TH | 10.99 | 0.002 |
(c) Multiple Comparisons between densities of non-predator species. The Tukey HSD with standard error 3.251817, df = 252,2
| SP ( | SP ( | | | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 8 | −3.69 | 0.49 |
| 4 | 8 | −3.69 | 0.49 |
T: tadpoles; B: B. bengalensis; TH: T. tuberculata.