| Literature DB >> 24672317 |
Huma Ajab1, Asim Yaqub2, Salman Akbar Malik3, Muhammad Junaid4, Sadia Yasmeen3, Mohd Azmuddin Abdullah1.
Abstract
In this study, concentrations of Cd, Ni, Pb, and Cr were determined in tobacco, tobacco smoke-condensate, and cigarette ash for selected brands used in Pakistan. Smoking apparatus was designed for metal extraction from cigarette smoke. Samples were digested through microwave digester and then analyzed by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (FAAS). Higher concentration of Ni was detected in imported brands than the counterparts in the local brands. Pb levels were however higher in local brands while significant concentration of Cd was observed in both brands. For Cr, the level in tobacco of local brands was higher than their emitted smoke, whereas imported brands showed higher level in smoke than in tobacco. The cigarette ash retained 65 to 75% of the metal and about 25 to 30% went into the body. While this study revealed the serious requirement to standardize the manufacturing of tobacco products, more importantly is the urgent need for stronger enforcements to put in place to alert the general population about the hazardous effects of cigarettes and the health risks associated with these toxic metals.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24672317 PMCID: PMC3929383 DOI: 10.1155/2014/413614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Smoking apparatus.
Moisture contents of local and imported cigarette brands.
| Local brands | Moisture content (%) | Imported brands | Moisture content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gold Leaf | 10.62 | Marlboro | 9.636 |
| Diplomat | 10.57 | Rothmans (King size) | 13.08 |
| K 2 (King size) | 10.94 | Benson & Hedges | 10.56 |
| Embassy (Kings) | 9.985 | Mild Seven | 4.483 |
| Red & white (King size) | 4.902 | Pine (Menthol lights) | 5.632 |
| Morven Gold | 5.800 | More (International) | 11.94 |
| Royals (Filter) | 15.48 | Business club | 10.32 |
| Gold Flake | 17.15 | Dunhill (International) | 5.085 |
| Park Lane (Special) | 5.181 | Pine Lights | 9.804 |
| Capstan (International) | 12.20 | Fisher | 7.931 |
|
| |||
| Average | 10.28% | Average | 8.847% |
Digestion program for smoke samples.
| Power (watt) | Max. % |
|
| Hold (mins) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 600 | 50 | 10 | 150 | 10 |
| 600 | 50 | 10 | 100 | 10 |
Digestion program for ash samples.
| Power (watt) | Max. % |
|
| Hold (mins) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1200 | 100 | 20 | 200 | 10 |
| 600 | 50 | 10 | 170 | 10 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for local cigarette brands in tobacco, smoke, and ash.
|
|
| Remarks | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobacco | Smoke | Ash | |||
| Cd | 0.501 ± 0.120 | 0.629 ± 0.132 | 1.029 ± 0.054 | 0.000** | Significant |
| Ni | 2.076 ± 1.113 | 1.691 ± 0.451 | 13.81 ± 1.591 | 0.000** | Significant |
| Pb | 14.39 ± 4.986 | 2.787 ± 0.835 | 22.88 ± 20.03 | 0.03* | Significant |
| Cr | 1.178 ± 0.196 | 0.844 ± 0.521 | 11.75 ± 1.365 | 0.000** | Significant |
*Significant difference (P < 0.05).
**Highly significant difference (P < 0.01).
Figure 2Comparison between local and imported cigarette brands in tobacco.
Figure 3Comparison between local and imported cigarette brands in smoke.
Figure 4Comparison between local and imported cigarette brands in ash.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for imported cigarette brands in tobacco, smoke, and ash.
|
|
| Remarks | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobacco | Smoke | Ash | |||
| Cd | 0.559 ± 0.141 | 0.712 ± 0.112 | 0.991 ± 0.105 | 0.000** | Significant |
| Ni | 2.294 ± 1.956 | 2.394 ± 1.728 | 10.47 ± 3.200 | 0.000** | Significant |
| Pb | 8.749 ± 3.111 | 2.800 ± 0.761 | 22.11 ± 16.45 | 0.000** | Significant |
| Cr | 0.951 ± 0.267 | 1.269 ± 0.737 | 8.294 ± 2.484 | 0.000** | Significant |
*Significant difference (P < 0.05).
**Highly significant difference (P < 0.01).