Literature DB >> 24672107

Effects of flow rate on hemodynamic parameters and agent consumption in low-flow desflurane anesthesia: An open-label, prospective study in 90 patients.

Mehmet A Elmacioglu1, Sitki Goksu1, Hasan Kocoglu1, Unsal Oner1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In surgical patients, decreasing the fresh gas flow rate in anesthesia may minimize costs, reduce environmental pollution, and preserve heat and humidity in the respiratory system.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 3 low-flowdesflurane rates on perioperative hemodynamic stability, end-tidal desflurane concentration, emergence and recovery characteristics, and agent consumption.
METHODS: This open-label, prospective study was conducted at the Departmentof Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey. Nonpremedicated adult patients scheduled to undergo surgery (ureterolithotomy, cholecystectomy, pyelolithotomy, or thyroidectomy) were enrolled. Patients were anesthetized with propofol and fentanyl and intubated after neuromuscular blockade with vecuronium. Patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups according to the fresh gas flow rate: medium flow (2 L/min), low flow (1 L/min), and minimal flow (0.5 L/min). Intraoperative fentanyl volume was recorded. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and end-tidal desflurane concentration were recorded before (baseline) and after anesthesia induction; immediately before incision; and 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after incision. Emergence time and desflurane consumption after extubation were recorded. Aldrete scores were recorded at 5, 15, and 30 minutes after extubation.
RESULTS: Ninety patients (46 women, 44 men; mean [SD] age, 39.74 [13.73] years; 30 patients per treatment group) participated in the study. Means of hemodynamic parameters, intraoperative volume of fentanyl, end-tidal desflurane concentration, emergence time, and Aldrete score were statistically similar between the 3 groups. Mean (SD) desflurane consumption was significantly higher in the medium-flow group compared with the low- and minimal-flow groups (110.43 [28.18] g vs 98.40 [23.62] g and 79.80 [17.54] g, respectively; both, P < 0.01). Mean (SD) desflurane consumption was also significantly higher in the low-flow group compared with the minimal-flow group (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The results of the present study in adult surgical patients suggestthat desflurane may be used in low-flow anesthesia, even with the minimal fresh gas flow rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  desflurane; flow rate; low flow

Year:  2005        PMID: 24672107      PMCID: PMC3964527          DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp        ISSN: 0011-393X


  14 in total

1.  Low-flow anaesthesia with desflurane: kinetics during clinical procedures.

Authors:  A Johansson; D Lundberg; H H Luttropp
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Low-flow anesthesia: theory, practice, technical preconditions, advantages, and foreign gas accumulation.

Authors:  J A Baum
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Low and minimal flow inhalational anaesthesia.

Authors:  A D Baxter
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Rates of awakening from anesthesia with I-653, halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane: a test of the effect of anesthetic concentration and duration in rats.

Authors:  E I Eger; B H Johnson
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Low-flow anaesthesia.

Authors:  J A Baum; A R Aitkenhead
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited.

Authors:  J A Aldrete
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.452

7.  Low flow and closed circuits.

Authors:  A B Baker
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.669

Review 8.  Low-flow anaesthesia. Does it have potential pharmacoeconomic consequences?

Authors:  S Suttner; J Boldt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Renal responses to low-flow desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol in patients.

Authors:  T J Ebert; S R Arain
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 10.  New inhaled anesthetics.

Authors:  E I Eger
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of Minimal Flow Sevoflurane or Desflurane Anaesthesia on Hemodynamic Parameters, Body Temperature and Anaesthetic Consumption.

Authors:  Duygu Taşkın; Ender Gedik; Zeynep Kayhan
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2020-05-05

2.  The Effect of Low-Flow and Normal-Flow Desflurane Anesthesia on the Frontal QRS-T Angle in Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty Operation: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Authors:  Tugba Bingol Tanriverdi; Mehmet Tercan; Gulcin Patmano; Zulkif Tanriverdi; Ayse Güsun Halitoglu; Ahmet Kaya
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.