Literature DB >> 24672100

Complementary and alternative medicine use by patients visiting a free health clinic: A single-site, pilot study.

Patrick G Clay1, Kevin A Clauson2, Alan Glaros3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has been documented to fluctuate widely, can greatly impact medical outcomes, and can influence patients' adherence to conventional medicines. Health care providers should assess the prevalence of CAM use (primarily herbal medicine) in individual settings to most accurately provide appropriate patient care.
OBJECTIVES: THE AIM OF THIS STUDY WAS TO DETERMINE THE FOLLOWING: (1) differences in demographic characteristics between users and nonusers of CAM; (2) which CAM patients are using; (3) patients' sources of information concerning CAM; and (4) whether patients recall being asked about CAM use by their health care providers.
METHODS: In this single-center, pilot study, a self-administered survey concerning CAM use was made available to persons seeking care at an inner-city free health clinic (Kansas City Free Health Clinic, Kansas City, Missouri). Completed surveys were scanned into a database, and descriptive analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Three hundred eleven patients completed ≥1 question on the survey. Of those who reported race (n = 278), 168 (60.4%) were Caucasian/white, 73 (26.3%) were African American/black, and 24 (8.6%) were Hispanic/Latino. Of those who reported educational level (n = 287), 101 (35.2%) had some high school or were high school graduates or had a general equivalency development diploma, 102 (35.5%) had completed some college or vocational training, and 84 (29.3%) had completed college. Of those who reported personal annual income (n = 191), 107 (56.0%) reported up to US $15,000, and 54 (28.3%) reported >$15,000 to $30,000. A high rate of CAM use (past or present) was found among survey respondents (116/285 [40.7%]). No correlation was found between CAM use and any of the demographic characteristics studied. Of 98 patients reporting whether their CAM use was past or current, 64 (65.3%) were using CAM at the time of the survey. Friends and physicians were reported to be most supportive of CAM use (21/41 [51.2%] and 33/86 [38.4%] patients, respectively). The most common CAM products reported as being currently used were garlic and chamomile (both, 5 patients [7.1%]), and echinacea and ginseng (both, 3 patients [4.7%]).
CONCLUSION: This survey of patients using an inner-city free health clinic showed a high rate of CAM use, which could significantly impact patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alternative; complementary; educational level; inner city; medically indigent

Year:  2004        PMID: 24672100      PMCID: PMC3964552          DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp        ISSN: 0011-393X


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of the use of complementary and alternative medicine in the largest United States-Mexico border city.

Authors:  José O Rivera; Melchor Ortiz; Mark E Lawson; Kalpana M Verma
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 2.  Complementary and alternative medicines in the treatment of dementia: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Bruce Diamond; Susan Johnson; Kathleen Torsney; Jennifer Morodan; Brian Prokop; Dana Davidek; Patricia Kramer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  The use of conventional and complementary treatments for knee osteoarthritis in the community.

Authors:  K M Jordan; S Sawyer; P Coakley; H E Smith; C Cooper; N K Arden
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  Ethnic minority use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM): a national probability survey of CAM utilizers.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Mackenzie; Lynne Taylor; Bernard S Bloom; David J Hufford; Jerry C Johnson
Journal:  Altern Ther Health Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.305

5.  Ethnic differences in complementary and alternative medicine use among cancer patients.

Authors:  G Maskarinec; D M Shumay; H Kakai; C C Gotay
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.579

6.  Long-term effects of glucosamine sulphate on osteoarthritis progression: a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  J Y Reginster; R Deroisy; L C Rovati; R L Lee; E Lejeune; O Bruyere; G Giacovelli; Y Henrotin; J E Dacre; C Gossett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-01-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey.

Authors:  D M Eisenberg; R B Davis; S L Ettner; S Appel; S Wilkey; M Van Rompay; R C Kessler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-11       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use.

Authors:  D M Eisenberg; R C Kessler; C Foster; F E Norlock; D R Calkins; T L Delbanco
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-01-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Impact of St John's wort treatment on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Ingrid Mai; Elke Störmer; Steffen Bauer; Hagen Krüger; Klemens Budde; Ivar Roots
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Navajo use of native healers.

Authors:  C Kim; Y S Kwok
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-11-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.