Literature DB >> 24672007

Preferential involvement by nucleus accumbens shell in mediating probabilistic learning and reversal shifts.

Gemma L Dalton1, Anthony G Phillips, Stan B Floresco.   

Abstract

Different subregions of nucleus accumbens (NAc) have been implicated in reward seeking, promoting flexible approach responses, suppressing nonrewarded actions, and facilitating shifts between different discrimination strategies. Interestingly, the NAc does not appear to mediate shifting between stimulus-reward associations (i.e., reversal learning) when reinforcement is predictable. How these nuclei may facilitate flexible response strategies when reward delivery is uncertain remains unclear. We investigated the effects of inactivation of the NAc shell and core on probabilistic reversal learning using an operant task wherein a "correct" response delivered reward on 80% of trials, and an "incorrect" response was reinforced on 20% of trials. Reinforcement contingencies were reversed repeatedly within a session. In well-trained rats, shell inactivation reduced the number of reversals completed and selectively reduced win-stay behavior. This impairment was apparent during the first discrimination, indicating a more general deficit in the use of probabilistic reward feedback to guide action selection. Shell inactivation also impaired reversal performance on a similar task where correct/incorrect choices always/never delivered reward. However, this impairment only emerged after both levers had been associated with reward. Inactivation of NAc core did not impair reversal performance but increased latencies to approach the response levers. These results suggest the NAc shell and core facilitate reward seeking in a distinct yet complementary manner when the relationship between specific actions and reward is uncertain or ambiguous and cognitive flexibility is required. The core promotes approach toward reward-associated stimuli, whereas the shell refines response selection to those specific actions more likely to yield reward.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive flexibility; nucleus accumbens; probabilistic reinforcement learning; rat; reversal learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24672007      PMCID: PMC6608131          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5058-13.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  34 in total

1.  Persistent Alterations of Accumbal Cholinergic Interneurons and Cognitive Dysfunction after Adolescent Intermittent Ethanol Exposure.

Authors:  E Galaj; B T Kipp; S B Floresco; L M Savage
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Effects of Ventral Striatum Lesions on Stimulus-Based versus Action-Based Reinforcement Learning.

Authors:  Kathryn M Rothenhoefer; Vincent D Costa; Ramón Bartolo; Raquel Vicario-Feliciano; Elisabeth A Murray; Bruno B Averbeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Ventral striatum lesions do not affect reinforcement learning with deterministic outcomes on slow time scales.

Authors:  Raquel Vicario-Feliciano; Elisabeth A Murray; Bruno B Averbeck
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Cerebellar contribution to higher and lower order rule learning and cognitive flexibility in mice.

Authors:  P E Dickson; J Cairns; D Goldowitz; G Mittleman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Differential effects of d- and l-enantiomers of govadine on distinct forms of cognitive flexibility and a comparison with dopaminergic drugs.

Authors:  Gemma L Dalton; Stan B Floresco; Anthony G Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Orbitofrontal or accumbens dopamine depletion does not affect risk-based decision making in rats.

Authors:  Bettina Mai; Wolfgang Hauber
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms regulating different forms of risk-related decision-making: Insights from animal models.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orsini; David E Moorman; Jared W Young; Barry Setlow; Stan B Floresco
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 8.  The neural basis of reversal learning: An updated perspective.

Authors:  A Izquierdo; J L Brigman; A K Radke; P H Rudebeck; A Holmes
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesions impair probabilistic reversal learning by reducing sensitivity to positive reward feedback.

Authors:  Anam Syed; Phillip M Baker; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Temporal Specificity of Reward Prediction Errors Signaled by Putative Dopamine Neurons in Rat VTA Depends on Ventral Striatum.

Authors:  Yuji K Takahashi; Angela J Langdon; Yael Niv; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.