Literature DB >> 24671928

Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis.

Yeoungjee Cho1, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Giovanni F M Strippoli, Sunil V Badve, Kathryn J Wiggins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The longevity of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited by high rates of technique failure, some of which stem from peritoneal membrane injury. 'Biocompatible' PD solutions have been developed to reduce damage to the peritoneal membrane.
OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of biocompatible PD solutions in comparison to standard PD solutions in patients receiving PD. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register (28 February 2013), through contact with the Trials Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, and handsearching conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in adults and children comparing the effects of biocompatible PD solutions (neutral pH, lactate-buffered, low glucose degradation product (GDP); neutral pH, bicarbonatelactate)-buffered, low GDP; glucose polymer (icodextrin)) in PD were included. Studies of amino acid-based PD solutions were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data on study quality and outcomes (including adverse effects). The authors contacted investigators to obtain missing information. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical variables, and mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous variables. MAIN
RESULTS: Thirty-six eligible studies (2719 patients) were identified: Neutral pH, lactate-buffered/bicarbonatelactate)-buffered, low GDP PD solution (24); icodextrin (12). Allocation methods and concealment were generally incompletely reported, and adequate in only ten studies (27.8%). Patients lost to follow-up ranged from 0% to 83.4%. Neutral pH, low GDP versus conventional glucose PD solutionBased on generally sub-optimal quality evidence, the use of neutral pH, low GDP PD solutions was associated with larger urine volumes at the end of the studies, up to three years of therapy duration (7 studies, 520 patients: MD 126.39 mL/d, 95% CI 26.73 to 226.05). Improved preservation of residual renal function was evident in studies with greater than 12 month follow-up (6 studies, 360 patients: SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.52). There was no significant effect on peritonitis, technique failure or adverse events with the use of neutral pH, low GDP PD solutions. Glucose polymer (icodextrin) versus conventional glucose PD solutionThere was a significant reduction in episodes of uncontrolled fluid overload (2 studies, 100 patients: RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.59) and improvement in peritoneal ultrafiltration (4 studies, 102 patients, MD 448.54 mL/d, 95% CI 289.28 to 607.80) without compromising residual renal function (4 studies, 114 patients: SMD 0.12, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.49) or urine output (3 studies, 69 patients: MD -88.88 mL/d, 95% CI -356.88 to 179.12) with icodextrin use. A comparable incidence of adverse events with the icodextrin (four studies) was reported. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Based on generally sub-optimal quality studies, use of neutral pH, low GDP PD solution led to greater urine output and higher residual renal function after use exceeded 12 months. Icodextrin prescription improved peritoneal ultrafiltration and mitigated uncontrolled fluid overload. There were no significant effects on peritonitis, technique survival, patient survival or harms identified with their use. Based on the best available evidence, the use of these 'biocompatible' PD solutions resulted in clinically relevant benefits without added risks of harm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671928     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007554.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  40 in total

1.  Trials (and tribulations) of biocompatible peritoneal dialysis fluids.

Authors:  David W Johnson; Yeoungjee Cho; Fiona G Brown
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Patient and Caregiver Priorities for Outcomes in Peritoneal Dialysis: Multinational Nominal Group Technique Study.

Authors:  Karine E Manera; David W Johnson; Jonathan C Craig; Jenny I Shen; Lorena Ruiz; Angela Yee-Moon Wang; Terence Yip; Samuel K S Fung; Matthew Tong; Achilles Lee; Yeoungjee Cho; Andrea K Viecelli; Benedicte Sautenet; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Edwina Anne Brown; Gillian Brunier; Jie Dong; Tony Dunning; Rajnish Mehrotra; Saraladevi Naicker; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Jeffrey Perl; Martin Wilkie; Allison Tong
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Effect of Neutral-pH, Low-Glucose Degradation Product Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions on Residual Renal Function, Urine Volume, and Ultrafiltration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seychelle Yohanna; Ali M A Alkatheeri; Scott K Brimble; Brendan McCormick; Arthur Iansavitchous; Peter G Blake; Arsh K Jain
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  The solution to better preservation of the peritoneal membrane still lies hidden in the solution.

Authors:  Dirk G Struijk
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 5.  The Current State of Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Rajnish Mehrotra; Olivier Devuyst; Simon J Davies; David W Johnson
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 6.  Difficult peritonitis cases in children undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis: relapsing, repeat, recurrent and zoonotic episodes.

Authors:  Sevcan A Bakkaloglu; Bradley A Warady
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 7.  Peritoneal Dialysis in Western Countries.

Authors:  Dirk G Struijk
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-03

8.  Complement Activation in Peritoneal Dialysis-Induced Arteriolopathy.

Authors:  Maria Bartosova; Betti Schaefer; Justo Lorenzo Bermejo; Silvia Tarantino; Felix Lasitschka; Stephan Macher-Goeppinger; Peter Sinn; Bradley A Warady; Ariane Zaloszyc; Katja Parapatics; Peter Májek; Keiryn L Bennett; Jun Oh; Christoph Aufricht; Franz Schaefer; Klaus Kratochwill; Claus Peter Schmitt
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 9.  ISPD Cardiovascular and Metabolic Guidelines in Adult Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Part I - Assessment and Management of Various Cardiovascular Risk Factors.

Authors:  Angela Yee Moon Wang; K Scott Brimble; Gillian Brunier; Stephen G Holt; Vivekanand Jha; David W Johnson; Shin-Wook Kang; Jeroen P Kooman; Mark Lambie; Chris McIntyre; Rajnish Mehrotra; Roberto Pecoits-Filho
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 10.  Assessment and Management of Hypertension among Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Vasilios Vaios; Panagiotis I Georgianos; Vassilios Liakopoulos; Rajiv Agarwal
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.