Literature DB >> 24671858

Midazolam with meperidine and dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam with meperidine for sedation during ERCP: prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial.

Ban Seok Lee1, Junghee Ryu2, Sang Hyub Lee1, Min Geun Lee1, Sang Eon Jang1, Jin-Hyeok Hwang1, Ji Kon Ryu1, Sang-Hwan Do2, Yong-Tae Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: The combination of midazolam and opioid has been widely used as a standard sedative regimen for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Following recent evidence that dexmedetomidine may exert a synergistic effect in combination with midazolam, this study compared the sedative effect and adverse events of midazolam - meperidine - dexmedetomidine (MMD) and midazolam - meperidine during ERCP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 110 patients who were scheduled for ERCP were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned, in a double-blind manner, to the MMD (n = 53) or midazolam - meperidine (n = 57) groups. Each patient received an intravenous (IV) bolus dose of midazolam and meperidine (0.06 mg/kg and 50 mg, 30 % reduction and 25 mg for patients aged ≥ 65 years, respectively). To this dose, a continuous IV infusion of dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg/h; MMD group) or the same volume of normal saline (midazolam - meperidine group) was added. The sedation level (Ramsay Sedation Scale [RSS]) as well as hemodynamic and respiratory changes were assessed.
RESULTS: Adequate sedation (RSS ≥ 3) was maintained during ERCP in 75.5 % and 36.8 % of the MMD and midazolam - meperidine group, respectively (P < 0.001). RSS scores were significantly higher in the MMD group (P < 0.001). Intraoperative bispectral index scores were significantly lower in the MMD group (P < 0.001) than in the midazolam - meperidine group. Lower additional (P = 0.001) and total (P = 0.003) doses of midazolam were required in the MMD group. Patients in the MMD group showed lower pain scores (P < 0.001) and higher satisfaction scores (P < 0.001). Desaturation occurred more frequently in the midazolam - meperidine group (11 vs. 1; P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of dexmedetomidine to the midazolam - meperidine regimen provided better sedative efficacy and a superior safety profile during ERCP compared with a midazolam - meperidine regimen.This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT01404689). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671858     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current role of non-anesthesiologist administered propofol sedation in advanced interventional endoscopy.

Authors:  Daniela Elena Burtea; Anca Dimitriu; Anca Elena Maloş; Adrian Săftoiu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-08-10

2.  Influence of dexmedetomidine on cardiac complications in non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Shuan Jin; Xueyue Zhou
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-06-28

3.  Efficacy of a Dexmedetomidine-Remifentanil Combination Compared with a Midazolam-Remifentanil Combination for Conscious Sedation During Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded Preliminary Trial.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Lu; Wenyuan Li; Huiyu Chen; Yanning Qian
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Dexmedetomidine or midazolam in combination with propofol for sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized double blind prospective study.

Authors:  Senem Koruk; Irfan Koruk; Ayse Mizrak Arslan; Murat Bilgi; Rauf Gul; Semsettin Bozgeyik
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 5.  Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite.

Authors:  Katherine B Hagan; Selvi Thirumurthi; Raju Gottumukkala; John Vargo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06

Review 6.  Monitored anesthesia care in and outside the operating room.

Authors:  Hye-Min Sohn; Jung-Hee Ryu
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-06-22

7.  Dexmedetomidine is safe and reduces the additional dose of midazolam for sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in very elderly patients.

Authors:  Osamu Inatomi; Takayuki Imai; Takehide Fujimoto; Kenichiro Takahashi; Yoshihiro Yokota; Noriaki Yamashita; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Atsushi Nishida; Shigeki Bamba; Mitsushige Sugimoto; Akira Andoh
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Comparison of ketamine-propofol mixture (ketofol) and midazolam-meperidine in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancretography (ERCP) for oldest old patients.

Authors:  Tarıkçı Kılıç Ebru; Kahraman Resul
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Efficacy of combination therapy with dexmedetomidine for benzodiazepines-induced disinhibition during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Yuki Ikeda; Makoto Yoshida; Kazuma Ishikawa; Tomohiro Kubo; Kazuyuki Murase; Kohichi Takada; Koji Miyanishi; Masayoshi Kobune; Junji Kato
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.409

10.  Dexmedetomidine provides less body motion and respiratory depression during sedation in double-balloon enteroscopy than midazolam.

Authors:  Hiroshi Oshima; Masanao Nakamura; Osamu Watanabe; Takeshi Yamamura; Kohei Funasaka; Eizaburo Ohno; Hiroki Kawashima; Ryoji Miyahara; Hidemi Goto; Yoshiki Hirooka
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2017-09-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.