Literature DB >> 24671828

Short- and long-term effects of litter size manipulation in a small wild-derived rodent.

Mikko Lehto Hürlimann1, Antoine Stier, Olivier Scholly, François Criscuolo, Pierre Bize.   

Abstract

Iteroparous organisms maximize their overall fitness by optimizing their reproductive effort over multiple reproductive events. Hence, changes in reproductive effort are expected to have both short- and long-term consequences on parents and their offspring. In laboratory rodents, manipulation of reproductive efforts during lactation has however revealed few short-term reproductive adjustments, suggesting that female laboratory rodents express maximal rather than optimal levels of reproductive investment as observed in semelparous organisms. Using a litter size manipulation (LSM) experiment in a small wild-derived rodent (the common vole; Microtus arvalis), we show that females altered their reproductive efforts in response to LSM, with females having higher metabolic rates and showing alternative body mass dynamics when rearing an enlarged rather than reduced litter. Those differences in female reproductive effort were nonetheless insufficient to fully match their pups' energy demand, pups being lighter at weaning in enlarged litters. Interestingly, female reproductive effort changes had long-term consequences, with females that had previously reared an enlarged litter being lighter at the birth of their subsequent litter and producing lower quality pups. We discuss the significance of using wild-derived animals in studies of reproductive effort optimization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brood size manipulation; cost of reproduction; life-history theories

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671828      PMCID: PMC3982437          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.1096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  9 in total

1.  Rate of metabolism during lactation in small terrestrial mammals (Crocidura russula, Mus domesticus and Microtus arvalis).

Authors:  Cédric Cretegny; Michel Genoud
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 2.320

Review 2.  The physiological costs of reproduction in small mammals.

Authors:  John R Speakman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Why don't birds lay more eggs?

Authors:  P Monaghan; R G Nager
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  The costs of parental care: a meta-analysis of the trade-off between parental effort and survival in birds.

Authors:  E S A Santos; S Nakagawa
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Does reproduction cause oxidative stress? An open question.

Authors:  Neil B Metcalfe; Pat Monaghan
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Ambient temperature shapes reproductive output during pregnancy and lactation in the common vole (Microtus arvalis): a test of the heat dissipation limit theory.

Authors:  Mirre J P Simons; Inonge Reimert; Vincent van der Vinne; Catherine Hambly; Lobke M Vaanholt; John R Speakman; Menno P Gerkema
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Limits to sustained energy intake. I. Lactation in the laboratory mouse Mus musculus.

Authors:  M S Johnson; S C Thomson; J R Speakman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Limits to sustained energy intake. III. Effects of concurrent pregnancy and lactation in Mus musculus.

Authors:  M S Johnson; S C Thomson; J R Speakman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Manipulating reproductive effort leads to changes in female reproductive scheduling but not oxidative stress.

Authors:  Edith D Aloise King; Michael Garratt; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.