Literature DB >> 24671742

Quality assurance in the treatment of colorectal cancer: the EURECCA initiative.

A J Breugom1, P G Boelens1, C B M van den Broek1, A Cervantes2, E Van Cutsem3, H J Schmoll4, V Valentini5, C J H van de Velde6.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers in Europe. Over the past few decades, important advances have been made in screening, staging and treatment of colorectal cancer. However, considerable variation between and within European countries remains, which implies that further improvements are possible. The most important remaining question now is: when are we, health care professionals, delivering the best available care to patients with colon or rectal cancer? Currently, quality assurance is a major issue in colorectal cancer care and quality assurance awareness is developing in almost all disciplines involved in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients. Quality assurance has shown to be effective in clinical trials. For example, standardisation and quality control were introduced in the Dutch TME trial and led to marked improvements of local control and survival in rectal cancer patients. Besides, audit structures can also be very effective in monitoring cancer management and national audits showed to further improve outcome in colorectal cancer patients. To reduce the differences between European countries, an international, multidisciplinary, outcome-based quality improvement programme, European Registration of Cancer Care (EURECCA), has been initiated. In the near future, the EURECCA dataset will perform research on subgroups as elderly patients or patients with comorbidities, which are often excluded from trials. For optimal colorectal cancer care, quality assurance in guideline formation and in multidisciplinary team management is also of great importance. The aim of this review was to create greater awareness and to give an overview of quality assurance in the management of colorectal cancer.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  audit; colorectal cancer; guidelines; multidisciplinarity; quality assurance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671742     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  14 in total

Review 1.  Endorsing good quality assurance practices in molecular pathology: risks and recommendations for diagnostic laboratories and external quality assessment providers.

Authors:  Lien Tembuyser; Elisabeth M C Dequeker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Surgery: palliative primary tumour resection in mCRC-debate continues.

Authors:  Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Quality Assurance and Improvement in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: From Clinical Trials to National Healthcare Initiatives.

Authors:  Christian Simon; Carmela Caballero
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-05-24

Review 4.  Distance as a Barrier to Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Massimo Ambroggi; Claudia Biasini; Cinzia Del Giovane; Fabio Fornari; Luigi Cavanna
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-10-28

5.  Involving patients in a multidisciplinary European consensus process and in the development of a 'patient summary of the consensus document for colon and rectal cancer care'.

Authors:  Petra G Boelens; Claire Taylor; Geoffrey Henning; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Eloy Espin; Theo Wiggers; Jola Gore-Booth; Barbara Moss; Vincenzo Valentini; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Surgery has a key role for quality assurance of colorectal cancer screening programs: impact of the third level multidisciplinary team on lymph nodal staging.

Authors:  Francesco Bianco; Silvia De Franciscis; Andrea Belli; Maria Di Lena; Antonio Avallone; Maria Antonia Bianco; Sabato Di Marzo; Letizia Gigli; Gianluca Rotondano; Silvana Russo Spena; Fabiana Tatangelo; Alfonso Tempesta; Giovanni Maria Romano
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Improved perioperative care is associated with improved long-term survival in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eligijus Poskus; Marius Kryzauskas; Tomas Poskus; Saulius Mikalauskas; Narimantas Evaldas Samalavicius; Oleg Aliosin; Sarunas Dailidenas; Algimantas Tamelis; Zilvinas Saladzinskas; Paulius Lizdenis; Audrone Jakaitiene; Giedre Smailyte; Kestutis Strupas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Variation of outcome and charges in operative management for diverticulitis.

Authors:  Hans F Fuchs; Ryan C Broderick; Cristina R Harnsberger; David C Chang; Elisabeth C Mclemore; Sonia Ramamoorthy; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Minimum Volume Discussion in the Treatment of Colon and Rectal Cancer: A Review of the Current Status and Relevance of Surgeon and Hospital Volume regarding Result Quality and the Impact on Health Economics.

Authors:  Karl-Heinrich Link; Peter Coy; Mark Roitman; Carola Link; Marko Kornmann; Ludger Staib
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-04-20

Review 10.  Colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; William M Grady; David Lieberman; Thomas Seufferlein; Joseph J Sung; Petra G Boelens; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 52.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.