PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of combining vandetanib, an orally available multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), with bicalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized phase II multi-center study. Eligible patients had rising PSA on androgen deprivation therapy, minimal symptoms and were chemotherapy-naïve. Protocol therapy was either vandetanib 300 mg oral daily plus bicalutamide 50 mg oral daily (Arm A) or bicalutamide 50 mg oral daily alone (Arm B) with cross-over to vandetanib monotherapy at progression. The primary endpoint was PSA response (≥ 50 % decline from baseline). RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were recruited, 19 in Arm A and 20 in Arm B. PSA response was comparable in Arm A and Arm B (18 vs. 19 %). Time to PSA progression was 3.16 months (95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.09, not reached (NR)) for Arm A and 3.09 months (95 % CI: 1.22, NR) for Arm B. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was more common in Arm A compared to Arm B (42 vs. 5 %; p = 0.019). Treatment with vandetanib was associated with a reduction in soluble VEGFR-2 levels after two cycles but an increase in plasma VEGF levels. CONCLUSION: The combination of vandetanib and bicalutamide was associated with considerable toxicity and did not have superior efficacy over bicalutamide alone. Further evaluation of this combination is not warranted in mCRPC.
PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of combining vandetanib, an orally available multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), with bicalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized phase II multi-center study. Eligible patients had rising PSA on androgen deprivation therapy, minimal symptoms and were chemotherapy-naïve. Protocol therapy was either vandetanib 300 mg oral daily plus bicalutamide 50 mg oral daily (Arm A) or bicalutamide 50 mg oral daily alone (Arm B) with cross-over to vandetanib monotherapy at progression. The primary endpoint was PSA response (≥ 50 % decline from baseline). RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were recruited, 19 in Arm A and 20 in Arm B. PSA response was comparable in Arm A and Arm B (18 vs. 19 %). Time to PSA progression was 3.16 months (95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.09, not reached (NR)) for Arm A and 3.09 months (95 % CI: 1.22, NR) for Arm B. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was more common in Arm A compared to Arm B (42 vs. 5 %; p = 0.019). Treatment with vandetanib was associated with a reduction in soluble VEGFR-2 levels after two cycles but an increase in plasma VEGF levels. CONCLUSION: The combination of vandetanib and bicalutamide was associated with considerable toxicity and did not have superior efficacy over bicalutamide alone. Further evaluation of this combination is not warranted in mCRPC.
Authors: O Kucuk; E Fisher; C M Moinpour; D Coleman; M H Hussain; A O Sartor; G S Chatta; B A Lowe; M A Eisenberger; E D Crawford Journal: Urology Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: H I Scher; C Liebertz; W K Kelly; M Mazumdar; C Brett; L Schwartz; G Kolvenbag; L Shapiro; M Schwartz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: William Kevin Kelly; Susan Halabi; Michael Carducci; Daniel George; John F Mahoney; Walter M Stadler; Michael Morris; Philip Kantoff; J Paul Monk; Ellen Kaplan; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Eric J Small Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Young E Whang; Andrew J Armstrong; W Kimryn Rathmell; Paul A Godley; William Y Kim; Raj S Pruthi; Eric M Wallen; Jeffrey M Crane; Dominic T Moore; Gayle Grigson; Karla Morris; Catharine P Watkins; Daniel J George Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2011-03-10 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Carmel Pezaro; Mark A Rosenthal; Howard Gurney; Ian D Davis; Craig Underhill; Michael J Boyer; Dusan Kotasek; Benjamin Solomon; Guy C Toner Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: József Horti; Anders Widmark; Arnulf Stenzl; Miriam H Federico; Raymond P Abratt; Nick Sanders; Gillian M Pover; István Bodrogi Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Kurtis Eisermann; Carly J Broderick; Anton Bazarov; Mustafa M Moazam; Gail C Fraizer Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 27.401
Authors: Stephen R Wedge; Donald J Ogilvie; Michael Dukes; Jane Kendrew; Rosemary Chester; Janet A Jackson; Sarah J Boffey; Paula J Valentine; Jon O Curwen; Helen L Musgrove; George A Graham; Gareth D Hughes; Andrew P Thomas; Elaine S E Stokes; Brenda Curry; Graham H P Richmond; Peter F Wadsworth; Alison L Bigley; Laurent F Hennequin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Helen Chow; Paramita M Ghosh; Ralph deVere White; Christopher P Evans; Marc A Dall'Era; Stanley A Yap; Yueju Li; Laurel A Beckett; Primo N Lara; Chong-Xian Pan Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Sunil Parimi; Misha Eliasziw; Scott North; Marc Trudeau; Eric Winquist; Kim N Chi; Dean Ruether; Tina Cheng; Bernhard J Eigl Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 3.850