Literature DB >> 24671385

Prevalence and consequences of delayed diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures.

M H Arastu1, S Grange, R Twyman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common injury, often presenting with a typical injury pattern. Historically, the literature indicates that the accuracy of diagnosis of ACL ruptures is poor at the initial medical consultation. The aims of this study were to determine: the mechanism of injury; changes in accuracy of diagnosis of ACL ruptures at initial presentation over the last decade; and the effect of subsequent delay in diagnosis and definitive treatment.
METHODS: A prospective cohort of one hundred and thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between 2005 and 2009 were analysed. The median age of the patients was 18 years (12-57). Sixteen patients were excluded due to chronic ACL injury.
RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen patients (117 ACL ruptures) were included in the analysis. A typical injury pattern was documented in 87 (74.4 %) of cases. The most common sporting activities associated with an ACL injury were football (35.3 %), skiing (21.6 %) and rugby (10.3 %). The majority of patients (67.5 %) sought medical attention within 1 week from time of injury. The correct diagnosis of an ACL rupture was made in 33 cases (28.2 %) at the initial medical consultation. The diagnosis was made following medical consultation in 13 (11.1 %) of cases with the use of magnetic resonance imaging and 6 (5.1 %) cases at arthroscopy. The median time to diagnosis was 6 weeks (0-192), and the median time to ACL reconstruction was 24 weeks (1-240). A delay in diagnosis of >6 months was associated with a medial meniscal tear rate of 72.2 % compared to 23.1 % if the diagnosis was made within 4 months of the injury (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a 'typical' mechanism of injury leading to ACL rupture, the rate of initial diagnosis in the UK still remains poor. This often leads to an unnecessary delay in the diagnosis and subsequent treatment and increases the risk of secondary injury to the knee. A delay in diagnosis of >6 months was associated with an increased medial meniscal tear rate. Patients who present with a 'typical' injury pattern should therefore be referred for further assessment by a knee specialist within 6 weeks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671385     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2947-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  21 in total

1.  The value of clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal tears and anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  Yavuz Kocabey; Onur Tetik; William M Isbell; O Ahmet Atay; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Changes in arthroscopic findings in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee prior to reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  A Foster; C Butcher; P G Turner
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anne Benjaminse; Alli Gokeler; Cees P van der Schans
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Comparison of selected lateral cutting activities used to assess ACL injury risk.

Authors:  Kristian M O'Connor; Sarika K Monteiro; Ian A Hoelker
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  A comparison of accuracy between clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  N E Rose; S M Gold
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Delay in diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury in sport.

Authors:  N Hartnett; R J Tregonning
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2001-01-26

Review 7.  Associated injuries in pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament tears: does a delay in treatment increase the risk of meniscal tear?

Authors:  Peter J Millett; Andrew A Willis; Russell F Warren
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  The outcome at 15 years of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft for 'isolated' anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  H E Bourke; D J Gordon; L J Salmon; A Waller; J Linklater; L A Pinczewski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-05

9.  The impact of an Acute Knee Clinic.

Authors:  Simon Ball; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Knee sprains and acute knee hemarthrosis: misdiagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  F R Noyes; L Paulos; L A Mooar; B Signer
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1980-12
View more
  14 in total

1.  Fresh versus frozen engineered bone-ligament-bone grafts for sheep anterior cruciate ligament repair.

Authors:  Vasudevan D Mahalingam; Nilofar Behbahani-Nejad; Elizabeth A Ronan; Tyler J Olsen; Michael J Smietana; Edward M Wojtys; Deneen M Wellik; Ellen M Arruda; Lisa M Larkin
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  Revision ACL reconstruction using quadriceps or hamstring autografts leads to similar results after 4 years: good objective stability but low rate of return to pre-injury sport level.

Authors:  Alexander Barié; Yannick Ehmann; Ayham Jaber; Jürgen Huber; Nikolaus A Streich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Prevalence of concomitant knee injuries associated with anterior cruciate ligament tear in kabaddi and football players.

Authors:  Ravi Gupta; Anil Kapoor; Gladson DavidMasih
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-06-06

4.  Patterns of presentation and early treatment outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament injury at the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Oladimeji Ranti Babalola; Wahab Egberongbe; Kehinde Sunday Oluwadiya
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2022-04-20

5.  Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine.

Authors:  Weilong Shi; Albert Anastasio; Ndeye F Guisse; Razan Faraj; Omolola P Fakunle; Kirk Easley; Kyle E Hammond
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-07-31

Review 6.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for suspected ACL and meniscal tears of the knee.

Authors:  Nigel Phelan; Patrick Rowland; Rose Galvin; John M O'Byrne
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Evaluating Different Clinical Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures In Providers with Different Training Backgrounds.

Authors:  Alexander Cm Chong; Chelsea Whitetree; Michael C Priddy; Parker R Zimmerman; Paul R Haeder; Daniel J Prohaska
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

8.  Towards improving the identification of anterior cruciate ligament tears in primary point-of-care settings.

Authors:  Jackie L Whittaker; Michelle Chan; Bo Pan; Imran Hassan; Terry Defreitas; Catherine Hui; Luciana Macedo; David Otto
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Increased Total Cost and Lack of Diagnostic Utility for Emergency Department Visits After ACL Injury.

Authors:  Lambert T Li; Carlin Chuck; Steven L Bokshan; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-12

10.  A Novel Application of Unsupervised Machine Learning and Supervised Machine Learning-Derived Radiomics in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture.

Authors:  De-Sheng Chen; Tong-Fu Wang; Jia-Wang Zhu; Bo Zhu; Zeng-Liang Wang; Jian-Gang Cao; Cai-Hong Feng; Jun-Wei Zhao
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.