| Literature DB >> 24671216 |
Zili Zhang1, Jian Wang1, Sifan Chen2, Zhaoyu Wei3, Zhengtu Li1, Siwen Zhao4, Wenju Lu1.
Abstract
Low plasma level of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) was an independent risk factor for cardio vascular disorder, and associated with poor outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension. To compare the effects of vegetarian diets and omnivorous diets on HDL-c in plasma, we identified cross-sectional and cohort studies related to HDL-c listed on PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge as well as the corresponding references (until Nov, 2013). Twelve studies with a total of 4177 individuals were selected for meta-analysis. This meta-analysis indicates that vegetarian diets did not alter plasma HDL-c concentrations, as it wasn't initially expected by the authors [Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = 0.02 mmol/l; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.19 to 0.22 mmol/l]. In Asia and Latin America countries, no significant differences in HDL-c levels between vegetarians and omnivores were found (SMD = -0.09 mmol/l; 95% CI: -0.43 to 0.25 mmol/l). In Europe and North America countries, the plasma level of HDL-c was also not different between the two diets (SMD = 0.09 mmol/l; 95% CI: -0.19 to 0.36 mmol/l). In light of this meta-analysis, we conclude that there is no evidence that plasma HDL-c levels differs in vegetarians and omnivores, even after adjusting for cultural circumstances.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24671216 PMCID: PMC3966789 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092609
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Results of search for eligible studies.
Characteristics of literatures included in the meta-analysis and observational studies evaluating the effects of diets in HDL (mmol/l)1.
| Study | Country | Cultural | Design | Median | BMI | Vegetarians | Omnivores | Weight | |||
| age | Vegetarians | Omnivores | No. ofsubjects | Mean±SD | No. ofsubjects | Mean±SD | (%) | ||||
| Thorogood | UK | Euro-Amer | Cohort | 38.2 | – | – | 1550 | 1.50±1.36 | 1198 | 1.49±1.20 | 12.0 |
| Alexander | USA | Euro-Amer | Cross | 44.0 | 27.2±5.2 | 31.4±7.4 | 74 | 1.15±0.27 | 45 | 1.03±0.26 | 8.7 |
| Krajcovicova | Slovak | Euro-Amer | Cross | 48.0 | 22.8±1.5 | 24.2±2.3 | 54 | 1.42±0.15 | 59 | 1.31±0.23 | 8.7 |
| Li | Australia | Euro-Amer | Cross | 37.5 | 23.6±2.8 | 26.4±3.4 | 43 | 1.03±0.24 | 60 | 1.09±0.25 | 8.4 |
| Hoffmann | Germany | Euro-Amer | Cross | 45.0 | – | – | 111 | 1.66±0.43 | 138 | 1.50±0.30 | 10.3 |
| Robinson | UK | Euro-Amer | Cross | 30.0 | 24.7±5.2 | 24.7±5.2 | 43 | 1.21±0.33 | 43 | 1.47±0.47 | 7.9 |
| Teixeira Rde | Brazil | Asia-Latin | Cross | 49.5 | 22.6±3.1 | 26.7±5.1 | 67 | 1.17±0.26 | 134 | 1.18±0.31 | 9.8 |
| De Biase | Brazil | Asia-Latin | Cross | 35.8 | 23.5±4.5 | 25.4±5.2 | 19 | 1.43±0.38 | 22 | 1.45±0.47 | 5.8 |
| Papadaki | Greece | Euro-Amer | Cross | 45.0 | 30.8±4.3 | 31.3±4.6 | 10 | 1.01±0.21 | 10 | 1.07±0.24 | 3.8 |
| Chen | China | Asia-Latin | Cross | 52.0 | 22.9±2.9 | 23.3±3.5 | 173 | 1.44±0.34 | 190 | 1.61±0.38 | 10.8 |
| K. Femandes | Brazil | Asia-Latin | Cross | 40.0 | 24.0±3.6 | 24.4±3.6 | 29 | 1.15±0.32 | 58 | 1.04±0.19 | 7.7 |
| C. Juliana | Brazil | Asia-Latin | Cross | 37.0 | 23.0±1.6 | 23.5±1.2 | 18 | 1.09±0.20 | 29 | 1.16±0.31 | 6.1 |
Data were expressed as Mean ± SD; To convert from mg/dl to mmol/L, multiply by 0.02586;
Euro-Amer (Europe and North America): UK, USA, Slovak, Australia, Germany, and Greece; Asia-Latin (Asia and Latin America): Brazil and China.
Cross: cross-sectional studies; Cohort: cohort studies.
Figure 2Forest plot of HDL-c levels among different diets.
The squares and horizontal lines correspond to the study-specific SMD and 95% CI. The area of the squares reflects the study-specific weight (inverse of the variance). The diamond represents the pooled SMD and 95% CI. % weighted for random-effects.
Figure 3Sensitivity analyses of 12 studies, the part between two short lines shows the 95% CI of one study, each small circle indicates mean differences.