Literature DB >> 24671159

Energy positive domestic wastewater treatment: the roles of anaerobic and phototrophic technologies.

B D Shoener1, I M Bradley, R D Cusick, J S Guest.   

Abstract

The negative energy balance of wastewater treatment could be reversed if anaerobic technologies were implemented for organic carbon oxidation and phototrophic technologies were utilized for nutrient recovery. To characterize the potential for energy positive wastewater treatment by anaerobic and phototrophic biotechnologies we performed a comprehensive literature review and analysis, focusing on energy production (as kJ per capita per day and as kJ m(-3) of wastewater treated), energy consumption, and treatment efficacy. Anaerobic technologies included in this review were the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR), anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR), anaerobic fluidized bed reactor (AFB), upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB), anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR), microbial electrolysis cell (MEC), and microbial fuel cell (MFC). Phototrophic technologies included were the high rate algal pond (HRAP), photobioreactor (PBR), stirred tank reactor, waste stabilization pond (WSP), and algal turf scrubber (ATS). Average energy recovery efficiencies for anaerobic technologies ranged from 1.6% (MFC) to 47.5% (ABR). When including typical percent chemical oxygen demand (COD) removals by each technology, this range would equate to roughly 40-1200 kJ per capita per day or 110-3300 kJ m(-3) of treated wastewater. The average bioenergy feedstock production by phototrophic technologies ranged from 1200-4700 kJ per capita per day or 3400-13 000 kJ m(-3) (exceeding anaerobic technologies and, at times, the energetic content of the influent organic carbon), with usable energy production dependent upon downstream conversion to fuels. Energy consumption analysis showed that energy positive anaerobic wastewater treatment by emerging technologies would require significant reductions of parasitic losses from mechanical mixing and gas sparging. Technology targets and critical barriers for energy-producing technologies are identified, and the role of integrated anaerobic and phototrophic bioprocesses in energy positive wastewater management is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671159     DOI: 10.1039/c3em00711a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  8 in total

Review 1.  Mini-review: high rate algal ponds, flexible systems for sustainable wastewater treatment.

Authors:  P Young; M Taylor; H J Fallowfield
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Benchmarking the scientific research on wastewater-energy nexus by using bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Tianlong Zheng; Pengyu Li; Zhining Shi; Jianguo Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Design and evaluation of degassed anaerobic membrane biofilm reactors for improved methane recovery.

Authors:  Brian C Crone; George A Sorial; Jonathan G Pressman; Hodon Ryu; Scott P Keely; Nichole Brinkman; Christina Bennett-Stamper; Jay L Garland
Journal:  Bioresour Technol Rep       Date:  2020-06-01

4.  Harnessing Solar Energy using Phototrophic Microorganisms: A Sustainable Pathway to Bioenergy, Biomaterials, and Environmental Solutions.

Authors:  Rahamat Ullah Tanvir; Jianying Zhang; Timothy Canter; Dick Chen; Jingrang Lu; Zhiqiang Hu
Journal:  Renew Sustain Energy Rev       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 16.799

5.  The importance of filamentous cyanobacteria in the development of oxygenic photogranules.

Authors:  Kim Milferstedt; W Camilla Kuo-Dahab; Caitlyn S Butler; Jérôme Hamelin; Ahmed S Abouhend; Kristie Stauch-White; Adam McNair; Christopher Watt; Blanca I Carbajal-González; Sona Dolan; Chul Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Resource Recovery from Wastewater by Biological Technologies: Opportunities, Challenges, and Prospects.

Authors:  Daniel Puyol; Damien J Batstone; Tim Hülsen; Sergi Astals; Miriam Peces; Jens O Krömer
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Microalgae and cyanobacteria modeling in water resource recovery facilities: A critical review.

Authors:  Brian D Shoener; Stephanie M Schramm; Fabrice Béline; Olivier Bernard; Carlos Martínez; Benedek G Plósz; Spencer Snowling; Jean-Philippe Steyer; Borja Valverde-Pérez; Dorottya Wágner; Jeremy S Guest
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2018-12-28

8.  A simplistic approach of algal biofuels production from wastewater using a Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor and Photobioreactor (HABR-PBR) System.

Authors:  Md Khalekuzzaman; Muhammed Alamgir; Md Bashirul Islam; Mehedi Hasan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.