Literature DB >> 24670967

Postradiation damage to the pelvic girdle in cervical cancer patients: is intensity-modulated radiation therapy safer than conventional radiation?

Yevgeniya Jane Mikhailovna Ioffe1, Travis J Hillen, Gongfu Zhou, Julie K Schwarz, L Stewart Massad, Matthew A Powell, Andrea R Hagemann, David G Mutch, Premal H Thaker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is frequently utilized in the treatment of cervical cancer. Our study compared instances of pelvic fractures, osteonecrosis, and osteomyelitis posttreatment with conventional radiation therapy (RT) versus IMRT in patients with cervical carcinomas.
METHODS: Eighty-three patients primarily treated with IMRT were case matched with 83 historical control subjects treated with conventional RT. Pretreatment and posttreatment computed tomography scans were reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to examine the effects of treatment type (conventional RT vs IMRT) on the occurrence of posttreatment pelvic bony structure complications while adjusting for confounders.
RESULTS: In the IMRT group, 3 (4%) of 83 patients developed posttreatment sacral fractures (median follow-up, 51 months). In the conventional RT group, there were 14 pelvic girdle complications (17%): 9 fractures, 2 cases of osteonecrosis, and 3 cases of osteomyelitis (median follow-up, 43.5 months; odds ratio, 4.49 for conventional vs IMRT groups, P = 0.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-14.1). In addition, there were 4 cases of posttreatment osteoporosis in the conventional RT group. All patients with complications in the IMRT group and 11 of 13 in the conventional RT group were symptomatic.
CONCLUSIONS: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is associated with a lower risk for pelvic girdle complications than conventional RT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24670967     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  6 in total

1.  Pelvic fractures and changes in bone mineral density after radiotherapy for cervical, endometrial, and vaginal cancer: A prospective study of 239 women.

Authors:  Mila P Salcedo; Anil K Sood; Anuja Jhingran; Patricia J Eifel; Ann H Klopp; Revathy B Iyer; Bryan M Fellman; Camilo Jimenez; Kathleen M Schmeler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Pelvic Insufficiency Fractures in Cervical Cancer After Radiation Therapy: A Meta-Analysis and Review.

Authors:  Youn Kyung Chung; Young-Kyun Lee; Byung-Ho Yoon; Dong Hoon Suh; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  From radiation osteitis to osteoradionecrosis: incidence and MR morphology of radiation-induced sacral pathologies following pelvic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Adrian J Meixel; Henrik Hauswald; Stefan Delorme; Björn Jobke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Junzo Chino; Christina M Annunziata; Sushil Beriwal; Lisa Bradfield; Beth A Erickson; Emma C Fields; KathrynJane Fitch; Matthew M Harkenrider; Christine H Holschneider; Mitchell Kamrava; Eric Leung; Lilie L Lin; Jyoti S Mayadev; Marc Morcos; Chika Nwachukwu; Daniel Petereit; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-18

5.  Increased risk of pelvic fracture after radiotherapy in rectal cancer survivors: A propensity matched study.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Kang; Tze-Fan Chao; Ti-Hao Wang; Yu-Wen Hu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Risk of Pelvic Fracture With Radiation Therapy in Older Patients.

Authors:  Lucas K Vitzthum; Helen Park; Kaveh Zakeri; Elena S Heide; Vinit Nalawade; Arno J Mundt; Florin Vaida; James D Murphy; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 7.038

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.