Literature DB >> 24670435

Climate extreme effects on the chemical composition of temperate grassland species under ambient and elevated CO2: a comparison of fructan and non-fructan accumulators.

Hamada AbdElgawad1, Darin Peshev2, Gaurav Zinta3, Wim Van den Ende2, Ivan A Janssens4, Han Asard1.   

Abstract

Elevated class="Chemical">CO2 concentrations and extreme climate events, are two increasing comclass="Chemical">ponents of the ongoing global climatic change factors, may alter class="Chemical">plant chemical comclass="Chemical">position and thereby their economic and ecological characteristics, e.g. nutritional quality and decomclass="Chemical">position rates. To investigate the imclass="Chemical">pact of climate extremes on tissue quality, four temclass="Chemical">perate grassland sclass="Chemical">pecies: the class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">fructan accumulating grasses Lolium perenne, Poa pratensis, and the nitrogen (N) fixing legumes Medicago lupulina and Lotus corniculatus were subjected to water deficit at elevated temperature (+3°C), under ambient CO2 (392 ppm) and elevated CO2 (620 ppm). As a general observation, the effects of the climate extreme were larger and more ubiquitous in combination with elevated CO2. The imposed climate extreme increased non-structural carbohydrate and phenolics in all species, whereas it increased lignin in legumes and decreased tannins in grasses. However, there was no significant effect of climate extreme on structural carbohydrates, proteins, lipids and mineral contents and stoichiometric ratios. In combination with elevated CO2, climate extreme elicited larger increases in fructan and sucrose content in the grasses without affecting the total carbohydrate content, while it significantly increased total carbohydrates in legumes. The accumulation of carbohydrates in legumes was accompanied by higher activity of sucrose phosphate synthase, sucrose synthase and ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase. In the legumes, elevated CO2 in combination with climate extreme reduced protein, phosphorus (P) and magnesium (Mg) contents and the total element:N ratio and it increased phenol, lignin, tannin, carbon (C), nitrogen (N) contents and C:N, C:P and N:P ratios. On the other hand, the tissue composition of the fructan accumulating grasses was not affected at this level, in line with recent views that fructans contribute to cellular homeostasis under stress. It is speculated that quality losses will be less prominent in grasses (fructan accumulators) than legumes under climate extreme and its combination with elevated CO2 conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24670435      PMCID: PMC3966776          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Global climate change conditions often alter plant chemical composition, which in turn can affect food and fodder quality, and decomposition rates [1]–[5]. These alterations in the chemical composition of plants grown under future climate will have significant impact on economical and ecological processes [1]–[5]. Therefore, it is pertinent to investigate the effects of climate change on plant chemical composition. The anticipated climate changes are predominately associated with the rise in the concentrations of class="Chemical">CO2 and a gradual rise in the earth's temclass="Chemical">perature, but also include increased frequency and intensity of extreme events (e.g. drought, heat wave and floodings) [6]. Effects of elevated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2 in altering the chemical composition of plants have been extensively studied [7]–[12]. However, global climate change is characterized by the co-occurrence of co-varying environmental variables, which often affect plant chemical composition differently as when applied separately [4], [13], [14]. Up to our knowledge, studies illustrating the combined effect of elevated CO2 and climate extremes on the chemical composition of plants are scarce. An example of such a study is that of Larsen et al. [12] which indicated that single treatments of drought and elevated CO2 resulted in significantly increased C:N ratios, while ratios remained unchanged when drought and elevated CO2 were combined. Drought stress and high temperature are important environclass="Species">mental factors, which restrict class="Chemical">plant growth and alter tissue chemical comclass="Chemical">position [14], [15]. When aclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">pplied separately, temperature [15] and drought [15] have been shown to alter the chemical composition of plants. Moreover, some studies have revealed that there is a significant interaction between drought and temperature in their effects on plant chemical composition [14], [12]. In this context, drought and elevated temperature altered the chemical composition by affecting carbohydrate concentrations. For example, under drought conditions, alfalfa accumulated starch, but lowered soluble sugars during vegetative growth [15]. Severe drought and elevated temperature significantly reduced the accumulation of free amino acids and soluble proteins in Leymus chinensis [14]. However, in future, higher temperatures and more frequent droughts will occur against a background of elevated CO2, and very little is known about the combined effects of climate extremes under elevated CO2. The anticipated changes in chemical composition are likely to alter tissue quality and decomposition rate. For example, elevated class="Chemical">CO2 caused a reduction in forage quality through a lower crude class="Chemical">protein content in different C3 and C4 class="Chemical">plant sclass="Chemical">pecies [16], and in combination with high temclass="Chemical">perature, reduced digestibility by enhancing fiber content in class="Chemical">pan class="Species">Medicago sativa [4]. Other CO2-induced tissue quality changes include an increased C/N ratio in soybean [17], and tannin accumulation in Lotus corniculatus [18]. The decreased tissue digestibility and decomposition rate associated with tannin accumulation is related to their ability to form digestion-resistant compounds with proteins as well as to direct inhibitory effects on microbial activity [5], [19], [20]. Altered stoichiometric ratios could affect the release of organic matter from decomposing materials by influencing the decomposers function [21]. On the other hand, elevated CO2 is likely to increase the tissue quality of fructan accumulating species via further increases in fructan and non-structural carbohydrate contents [22], [24]. In addition to their roles in plant stress tolerance, fructans are now widely recognized as fermentable food fibers and acknowledged for their health and immunomodulatory effects [25], [26]. Inulin-type fructans promote element resorption [27] and control insulin, cholesterol, triacylglycerol and phospholipid levels in animals and humans [28], [29]. Hence, to get a global overview on the tissue composition it is important to understand the metabolism under future climate conditions and to test the above mentioned metabolites to better assess the nutritional quality, digestibility and decomposability of plants. For this reason, we conducted a study in which we exposed plants to climate extreme under current and elevated CO2, and monitored the changes in a wide range of elements and metabolites. Understanding changes in plant chemical composition in response to global change is further complicated because effects are species dependent. This is clear from the variation in response to elevated class="Chemical">CO2 at the class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">carbohydrate level (see above), but species responses also differ for other tissue quality parameters. Legumes had lower C:N, higher C:P, and higher N:P ratios than non-legumes when grown under elevated CO2 [30], related to their N fixing ability, more easily matching enhanced C assimilation [31], [32]. Barbehenn et al. [33] indicated that C3 grasses would have higher nutritional quality than C4 grasses under elevated [CO2], based on higher levels of proteins and fructans. Polyphenols were significantly increased in Lolium perenne compared to Medicago lupulina under climate extreme conditions [34]. It therefore appears worth to pay closer attention to compare climate effects on the chemical composition of different plant groups. Grasslands cover 15% of the European land area and are important food sources for livestock [35], [36]. They are also an important component in the global C balance, by storing apan class="Species">pproximately one third of the terrestrial C stock. Changes in grassland growth and class="Chemical">productivity resulting from changing climate conditions are therefore likely to have considerable imclass="Chemical">pact on ecology and food resources. Thus, it is imclass="Chemical">portant to investigate the grassland sclass="Chemical">pecies resclass="Chemical">ponses to climate changes. Based on this knowledge, we here test the hypotheses that, 1) a climate extreme (class="Chemical">water deficit under elevated temclass="Chemical">perature) affects the chemical comclass="Chemical">position of common temclass="Chemical">perate grassland sclass="Chemical">pecies, which are imclass="Chemical">portant food sources for livestock, 2) that this effect is altered under elevated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2, and 3) that these chemical changes differ among plant species and species groups. Specifically, we compared four grassland species, two fructan accumulating grasses and two non-fructan accumulating legumes.

Materials and Methods

Experimental set-up and plant harvest

Experimental set-up

A mesocosm expericlass="Species">ment was conducted at the Drie Eiken Camclass="Chemical">pus of Antwerclass="Chemical">p University, Belgium (51o 09′ N, 04o 24′ E, 10 m elevation). Seed of each sclass="Chemical">pecies was sown in a non-climate controlled greenhouse and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">watered twice a week. After five weeks, seedlings of four temperate grassland species, two fructan accumulating grasses (Lolium perenne L., Poa pratensis L.) and two N-fixing legumes (Medicago lupulina L., Lotus corniculatus L.), were transplanted in 16 sunlit, south facing, climate controlled chambers (1). The interior surface area of each chamber was 1.5×1.5 m, height at the north side was 1.5 m and at the south side 1.2 m. The top of chambers consisted of a 4-mm thick colorless polycarbonate plate, whereas the sides were made of a 200-μm thick polyethylene film, both UV transparent. For each climate treatment four chambers were used and each chamber contained two populations (9 individuals with 5 cm interspace between them) of each species (Figure S1), grown in PVC tubes (19 cm diameter, 40 cm height) with sandy soil (96% sand, [37]. At the end, results of the two populations of each species, from the same chamber, were averaged yielding four biological replicates per climate treatment (i.e. n = 4). The climate scenarios ‘current’ and ‘future climate' were chosen according to the IPCC-SRES B2-scenario prediction of moderate change for the year 2100 [38]. In the past, numerous studies of CO2-only have already been conducted. Our experimental facilities included 16-growth chambers, of which only four chambers were equipped with CO2-control. Because the growth chamber was the unit of replication in this study, having a CO2-only treatment would have reduced the degree of replication to n = 2 or n = 3, with dramatic loss of statistical power. Instead of the typical orthogonal design, which would have allowed us to test the imposed of CO2-only, we therefore opted for an incremental design, focusing on the impact of drought stress: no drought, drought only, drought in a warmer climate, and drought in a warmer climate and higher CO2 climate. The detailed climate conditions in these four treatments were; 1) current climate, with ambient temperature and CO2 concentration (392±42 ppm) and sufficient water supply (Ambient, A); 2) drought stress in a current climate (D); 3) a climate extreme treatment, i.e. drought stress in a warmer climate (Tair +3°C); and, 4) a climate extreme (drought at elevated T) treatment combined with elevated CO2 (Tair+3.02±0.82°C) (DTC); CO2 (615±81 ppm). Treatment D was omitted from this study, for two reasons. First, significant differences between D and DT conditions were very few. Second, the paper becomes unnecessarily complex because the significance levels of the difference between the D and A treatment were often different from those between the DT and A treatments. The class="Chemical">CO2 concentrations were monitored and maintained at the target concentration with a class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2 analyser (WMA-4, PP Systems, Hitchin, UK). The air temperature was monitored by a Siemens, type QFA66 sensor (Berlin, Germany). The temperature in current climate chambers followed the average daily air temperature course calculated for the period from 1996 to 2005. The temperature in the future climate treatments followed the same course but elevated by 3°C. Photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) was measured by a SDEC, type JYP1000 quantum sensor (SDEC, Reignac sur Indre, France). Microclimate parameters inside and outside each chamber were automatically logged every 30 min [39]. The average vapour pressure deficit was 0.35±0.02 and 0.46±0.02 kPa (SD) in the climate treatments with ambient and warmed air temperature, respectively. Irrigation was calculated from the monthly rainfall over the period 1995–2005 and corrected for differences in evapotranspiration (ET) inside and outside the chambers De Boeck et al. [40]. Drought was induced by withdrawing irrigation at 122 days after sowing for different periods of time. class="Chemical">Plants were harvested for analysis when 50% of the drought-exclass="Chemical">posed class="Chemical">poclass="Chemical">pulation showed clear signs of stress: i.e. leaf discoloration, wilting and class="Chemical">pan class="Disease">dehydration. This occurred after one week for M. lupulina and L. corniculatus, two weeks for L. perenne and three weeks for P. pratensis. These differences in the timing of stress occurrence mirrored declines of photosynthesis rate and stomatal conductance (see Figure S2). Harvesting of the above ground tissue of nine plants in each population was done by cutting plants 4 cm above the soil surface, rapid freezing in liquid nitrogen and storage at −80°C. For each species, the biochemical results of both populations per chamber were averaged yielding four replicates (chambers) per climate treatment.

Metabolite Measurements

Carbohydrates

Small soluble class="Chemical">sugars were determined in 0.2 g (FW) class="Chemical">plant material, ground in liquid class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">nitrogen (MagNALyser, Roche, Vilvoorde, Belgium) and extracted in 1 ml of 50 mM TAE buffer pH 7.5 (0.02% sodium azide, 10 mM mannitol, 0.1% polyclar, 10 mM NaHSO3, 1 mM mercapto-ethanol, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride (PMSF)). The extract was centrifuged (14,000 g, 4°C, 5 min), 150 μl was heated for 5 min in a water bath at 90°C. After cooling and centrifugation (14,000 g, 4°C, 5 min), the supernatant was added to a mixed bed Dowex column (300 μl Dowex H+, 300 μl Dowex Ac–; both 100–200 mesh; Acros Organics, Morris Plains, NJ, USA). The column was eluted six times with 150 μl of ddH2O. Glucose, fructose, sucrose and raffinose concentrations were measured by HPAEC-PAD as before [41]. In legumes (M. lupulina and L. corniculatus), total soluble sugars was calculated as a sum of the measured individual soluble sugars, whereas total fructan was also added in the case of grasses (L. perenne and P. pratensis). Total fructan levels and fructan patterns were generated as described [42]. The remaining pellet of soluble class="Chemical">sugars extraction was treated with a mixture of α-amylase and amyloglucosidase to extract class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">starch (100 U/ml, 1 h, 45°C, [43]. Sugar concentrations in the total soluble and starch extracts was estimated by the anthrone reagent method. Cellulose was extracted from 0.2 g DW plant material, by boiling in 100°C nitric acid/acetic acid (1∶8, v/v, 1 h) to remove lignin, hemicellulose and xylosans after successive centrifugations at 14,000 for 15 min, and dilution with 67% H2SO4 (v/v). Cellulose was determined at 620 nm using the anthrone reagent.

Soluble and total protein

Frozen plant material (0.2 g FW) was homogenized by MagNALyser in 2 class="Species">ml of cold 0.05 M class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and centrifuged (14,000 g, 4°C, 20 min). The supernatant was treated with 10% (w/v) TCA to precipitate soluble protein, which were redissolved in 1 N NaOH. The remaining pellet was used to measure insoluble proteins. It was successively washed with 80% ethanol (v/v), 10% (w/v) cold TCA, ethanol:chloroform (3∶1, v/v), ethanol:ether (3∶1, v/v), and ether to remove phenolic compounds. The washed pellet was re-dissolved in 1 N NaOH at 80°C for 1 h and soluble and insoluble protein content was estimated [44]. Total protein content was calculated by adding the contents of soluble and insoluble proteins.

Lignin, polyphenols and tannin

For class="Chemical">lignin determination, 0.1 g DW class="Chemical">plant material was homogenized (MagNALyser) with 2 class="Chemical">pan class="Species">ml 95% ethanol and centrifuged (14,000 g, 4°C, 3 min). The pellet was washed with different organic solvents at high temperatures, then 1 ml of 25% acetyl bromide in acetic acid (1∶3, v/v) was added to the pellet and incubated at 70°C for 30 min. After cooling, 0.2 ml of 2 M NaOH and 0.1 ml of 7.5 M hydroxylamine hydrochloride were added, and the volume was made up to 10 ml with acetic acid. After centrifugation (1,000 g, 5 min), the absorbance was measured at 280 nm [45]. Polyphenols were extracted in 2 ml 80% ethanol (v/v) (0.2 g DW, MagNALyser) and determined with gallic acid as the standard [46]. Tannin content was determined [47] by homogenizing (MagNALyser) 0.2 g FW tissue in 2 ml 0.1 M acetate buffer pH 5, containing 2 mg of bovine serum albumin, incubated for 15 min at room temperature and centrifuged (14,000 g, 4°C, 15 min). The pellet was dissolved in 4 ml a 1% (w/v) SDS and 5% (v/v) tri-ethanolamine solution. One ml of 10 mM FeCl3 in 0.01 N HCl was added and the absorbance determined at 510 nm. Tannic acid was used as the standard.

C, N, macro-minerals and trace elements

C and N contents were measured with a CN eleclass="Species">ment analyser (NC-2100, Carlo Erba Instruclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">ments, Milan, Italy). For Macro-minerals and trace elements, 100 mg DW plant material was digested in a 5∶1 ratio of HNO3/H2O in a microwave oven and determined by mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Finnigan Element XR, Scientific, Bremen, Germany). A mixture of standards was prepared in 1% nitric acid.

Enzyme activity measurements

Carbohydrate metabolism enzymes

Neutral and soluble acid invertases were extracted in five volumes of the same ice-cold class="Chemical">TAE extraction buffer (class="Chemical">pH 7.5) as used for the small soluble class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">sugar analysis (see above) and then centrifuged at 14,000 g, 15 min at 4°C. The pellet was washed three times with ice-cold 50 mM Na-acetate buffer, pH 5.0 and redissolved in this buffer. Aliquots of this suspension were subsequently used for cell wall activity determinations under continuous shaking at 30°C (500 rpm; Thermomixer®, eppendorf) to keep the walls in suspension. The supernatant was split in two parts and used for the determinations of soluble acid and neutral invertase activities, respectively. After precipitation by 80% saturated (NH4)2SO4, (incubation on ice for 30 min, centrifugation at 14 000 g, 4°C, 5 min), the pellets were washed three times with 800 μl of 80% (NH4)2SO4-saturated in TAE buffer pH 8.5 (neutral invertases) and Na-acetate buffer, pH 5.0 (soluble acid invertases). Finally, pellets were dissolved in 150 μl 50 mM Na-acetate buffer, pH 5.0 (soluble acid invertase and in TAE buffer pH 8.5 (neutral invertases). Invertase activity was determined in 100 μl reaction mixtures containing 100 mM sucrose in TAE buffer pH 8.5 or Na-acetate buffer pH 5.0 containing 0.02% (w/v) Na-azide. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 30°C, and the reactions were stopped by keeping an aliquot for 5 min in a water bath at 90°C. Fructose concentrations were measured as described above. pan class="Chemical">Sucrose class="Chemical">phosclass="Chemical">phate synthase and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">sucrose synthase were extracted (MagNALyser) from 0.2 g fresh plant material in 1 ml HEPES buffer (100 mM HEPES pH 8.2, 10 mM EDTA, 15 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM sodium diethyl dithiocarbamate, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1% PPV). After centrifugation (14,000 g, 4°C, 15 min) the supernatant was cleaned [48]. Sucrose synthase activity was measured [49] by measuring the reduction of NAD+ at 340 nm, in a reaction mixture containing 100 mM bicine KOH buffer (pH 8.5, 100 mM sucrose, 2 mM UDP, 0.025 U UDP-glucose dehydrogenase, 1.5 mM NAD+). Sucrose phosphate synthase was measured in 1 ml of HEPES buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 8.2, 2.2 mM UDP- glucose, 4.4 mM fructose-6-phosphate, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM NaF) at 37°C for 15 min, and stopped by adding 30% NaOH and 10 min boiling. Sucrose concentrations were determined with the anthrone reagent, as described above. class="Chemical">ADP-Gclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">lc pyrophosphorylase was extracted (MagNALyser) from 0.2 g FW plant samples [50]. After centrifugation (14,000 g, 4°C, 5 min), the supernatant was mixed with 80 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ADP-glucose, 0.6 mM NAD+, 10 μM glucose-1,6- phosphate, 2,3 mM DTT, 0.02% BSA, 1 U phosphoglucomutase, 2.5 U NAD-linked glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase), and the activity measured as the NAD+ reduction at 340 nm and 30°C.

Phenol and lignin biosynthesis enzymes

class="Chemical">PAL was extracted from 0.2 g (FW) frozen class="Chemical">plant material in 1 class="Chemical">pan class="Species">ml sodium borate buffer (200 mM, pH 8.8, Koukol and Conn, 1961), and assayed by measuring the absorbance of trans-cinnamic acid at 290 nm. For the cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase activity analysis, 5 g (FW) tissue was extracted in 10 ml Tris:HCl buffer (200 mM Tris, pH 7.5), the activity was measured by monitoring the production of cinnamyl aldehyde at 400 nm [51].

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed by procedure of the Statistical Analysis System (Sclass="Chemical">PSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The assumclass="Chemical">ptions of normality of distribution and homogeneity of variance were examined. Since both assumclass="Chemical">ptions were met, transformations were not necessary and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done on the original data. The imclass="Chemical">pact of climate treatclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">ments: no drought, drought in a warmer climate, and drought in a warmer climate and higher CO2 climate was tested by one-way ANOVA procedure. Number of replicates (chambers) for each climate treatment was four (n = 4). The significant differences between the means were determined by using the Duncan test (P<0.05). Multiple testing corrections were carried out by using Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR). The relationships between treatment variables were analyzed by using Pearson correlation.

Results

Carbohydrate metabolism

The difference in class="Chemical">fructan and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">starch accumulation between the grasses and legumes is clear (Figure 1E and H), as well as the strongly differing cell wall and neutral invertase activities (Figure 2B and D). In all four species, the total soluble sugar and non-structural carbohydrates content significantly increased under climate extreme conditions (DT) (Figure 1A and G). This increase was also often reflected in the contents of individual soluble sugars, glucose, fructose, sucrose, raffinose and total fructan (Figure1 B, C, D, E and F). As compared to the two legumes, fructans were detected only in the two grasses and were further accumulated by climate extreme conditions. There was generally no effect of the climate extreme on the accumulation of starch (Figure 1H), cellulose (Figure 1I) and total structural carbohydrates (Figure 1J).
Figure 1

Effect of climate extreme conditions in ambient and elevated CO2 on carbohydrate fractions.

Climate conditions: ambient (A), drought and warming (DT), drought and warming in elevated CO2. Grassland species: Lolium perenne (Lp), Poa pratensis (Pp), Medicago lupulina (Ml) and Lotus corniculatus (Lc). The different panels show, Total soluble sugar (A), Glucose (B), Fructose (C), Sucrose (D), Raffinose (E), Total fructan (F), Non structural carbohydrate (G), Starch (H), Cellulose (I) and Structural carbohydrate (J). Different letters in the graph represent significant differences between A, DT and DTC at p<0.05 (n = 4).

Figure 2

Effect of climate extreme conditions in ambient and elevated CO2 on carbohydrate metabolism enzyme activities.

Climate conditions: ambient (A), drought and warming (DT), drought and warming in elevated CO2. Grassland species: Lolium perenne (Lp), Poa pratensis (Pp), Medicago lupulina (Ml) and Lotus corniculatus (Lc). The different panels show Sucrose phosphate synthase (A), Neutral invertase (B) Soluble acid invertase (C), Cell wall invertase (D), Sucrose synthase (E) and ADPG pyrophosphorylase (F). Different letters in the graph represent significant differences between A, DT and DTC at p<0.05 (n = 4).

Effect of climate extreme conditions in ambient and elevated CO2 on carbohydrate fractions.

Climate conditions: ambient (A), drought and warming (class="Chemical">DT), drought and warming in elevated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2. Grassland species: Lolium perenne (Lp), Poa pratensis (Pp), Medicago lupulina (Ml) and Lotus corniculatus (Lc). The different panels show, Total soluble sugar (A), Glucose (B), Fructose (C), Sucrose (D), Raffinose (E), Total fructan (F), Non structural carbohydrate (G), Starch (H), Cellulose (I) and Structural carbohydrate (J). Different letters in the graph represent significant differences between A, DT and DTC at p<0.05 (n = 4).

Effect of climate extreme conditions in ambient and elevated CO2 on carbohydrate metabolism enzyme activities.

Climate conditions: ambient (A), drought and warming (class="Chemical">DT), drought and warming in elevated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2. Grassland species: Lolium perenne (Lp), Poa pratensis (Pp), Medicago lupulina (Ml) and Lotus corniculatus (Lc). The different panels show Sucrose phosphate synthase (A), Neutral invertase (B) Soluble acid invertase (C), Cell wall invertase (D), Sucrose synthase (E) and ADPG pyrophosphorylase (F). Different letters in the graph represent significant differences between A, DT and DTC at p<0.05 (n = 4). Elevated class="Chemical">CO2 (class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">DTC) magnified the climate-mediated induction of the sucrose and fructan contents and counteracted the increase of hexoses in the grasses, without significantly changing the total soluble sugar content. On the other hand, elevated [CO2] further increased all carbohydrates levels in the two legumes (Figure 1). A species-specific pattern was also observed at the level of the total structural and non-structural carbohydrate content, and at the starch and cellulose levels; i.e. as compared to climate extreme, elevated CO2 did not affect, or even slightly decreased, these carbohydrates in L. perenne and P. pratensis, but significantly increased their levels in M. lupulina and L. corniculatus. class="Chemical">Sucrose class="Chemical">phosclass="Chemical">phate synthase, different tyclass="Chemical">pes of invertases, class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">sucrose synthase and ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase are key enzymes in sucrose and starch metabolism. Sucrose phosphate synthase mediates the synthesis of sucrose-6-phosphate [52], whereas sucrose synthase and invertases are involved in sucrose degradation [53], affecting subsequent starch synthesis via ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase [54]. The climate extreme conditions had different effects on these enzymes. Sucrose phosphate synthase activity (Figure 2A) was induced by drought and elevated temperature (DT) in all species. However, these conditions had little effect on invertase activity, i.e. neutral-, acid soluble invertase and acid cell wall-invertases (Figure 2B, C and D respectively) in either species. Similarly, no clear changes in sucrose synthase and ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase activity were observed in either species under the climate extreme (Figure 2E, F). As was observed at the level of the soluble class="Chemical">sugar concentrations, elevated [class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2] reduced the effect of the climate extreme on sucrose phosphate synthase in the grasses. However, the opposite was observed in the legumes where elevated CO2 resulted in increased soluble sugar levels and sucrose phosphate synthase activities. At the invertase level, increased CO2 did not alter the impact of the climate extreme, except in the legumes, where the activity of the neutral invertase and cell wall invertases strongly decreased as compared to the DT condition. By contrast, sucrose synthase and ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase activities were induced in the legumes by 36 and 34% and by 92 and 60% in M. lupulina and L. corniculatus respectively, under the combined treatment of climate extreme and elevated CO2.

Constituents affecting plant nutritional quality and decomposition rate

The climate extreme generally had no or little effect on the total protein and class="Chemical">lipid contents (Figure 3A and B). The treatclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">ment significantly increased the polyphenol content in all species except L. corniculatus (Figure 3C). Lignin, an indigestible polymer, showed no significant changes under the climate conditions in both grass species, whereas higher lignin contents were observed in the legumes (Figure 3D). Tannins are commonly found metabolites that possess anti-nutritional and anti-feed properties [5]. Tannins did not change in both legume species, but markedly decreased in the two grasses as a result of the drought and warming (44 and 39%, respectively) (Figure 3E).
Figure 3

Effect of climate extreme conditions in ambient and elevated CO2 on metabolite classes.

Climate conditions: ambient (A), drought and warming (DT), drought and warming in elevated CO2. Grassland species: Lolium perenne (Lp), Poa pratensis (Pp), Medicago lupulina (Ml) and Lotus corniculatus (Lc). The different panels show Protein (A), Lipid (B), Lignin (C), Polyphenols (D) and Tannins (E). Different letters in the graph represent significant differences between A, DT and DTC at p<0.05 (n = 4).

Effect of climate extreme conditions in ambient and elevated CO2 on metabolite classes.

Climate conditions: ambient (A), drought and warming (class="Chemical">DT), drought and warming in elevated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2. Grassland species: Lolium perenne (Lp), Poa pratensis (Pp), Medicago lupulina (Ml) and Lotus corniculatus (Lc). The different panels show Protein (A), Lipid (B), Lignin (C), Polyphenols (D) and Tannins (E). Different letters in the graph represent significant differences between A, DT and DTC at p<0.05 (n = 4). Increasing the class="Chemical">CO2 concentration affected the resclass="Chemical">ponse to drought and warming of some of measured tissue quality class="Chemical">parameters. Elevated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2 did not alter the lipid or lignin content in any of the species, but it significantly reduced the total protein content in the legumes (Figure 3A). Similarly, elevated CO2 did not alter the climate extreme-response of the polyphenols and tannins in the grasses, while it significantly increased the tannins in the legumes. To better understand the mechanism underlying the changes in class="Chemical">polyphenol and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">lignins, we measured phenylalanine ammonia lyase and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, the key enzymes in their respective biosynthetic pathways. Phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity increased slightly by the climate extreme treatment in most species, and strongest in L. corniculatus (Figure 4A). Activity of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase increased only in the legumes (Figure 4B). Elevation of CO2 levels in the drought and warming treatment (DTC) generally did not significantly alter phenylalanine ammonia lyase and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase activities, with the exception of an increase in the activity of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase in L. corniculatus.
Figure 4

Effect of climate extreme conditions in ambient and elevated CO2 on polyphenol metabolism enzyme activities.

Climate conditions: ambient (A), drought and warming (DT), drought and warming in elevated CO2. Grassland species: Lolium perenne (Lp), Poa pratensis (Pp), Medicago lupulina (Ml) and Lotus corniculatus (Lc). The different panels show Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (A) and Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (B). Different letters in the graph represent significant differences between A, DT and DTC at p<0.05 (n = 4).

Effect of climate extreme conditions in ambient and elevated CO2 on polyphenol metabolism enzyme activities.

Climate conditions: ambient (A), drought and warming (class="Chemical">DT), drought and warming in elevated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2. Grassland species: Lolium perenne (Lp), Poa pratensis (Pp), Medicago lupulina (Ml) and Lotus corniculatus (Lc). The different panels show Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (A) and Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (B). Different letters in the graph represent significant differences between A, DT and DTC at p<0.05 (n = 4). Net rates of nutrient release during plant decomposition are strongly related to their initial concentration and stoichiometry [55]. We found that there was no significant effect of the climate extreme on the concentrations of macronutrients (N, C, class="Chemical">P, Ca, class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Mg, Na and K) or trace elements (Cu and Mn) in all four-plant species (Figure 5 A, B, C, D, E and F). The climate extreme also did not significantly affect aboveground plant stoichiometry in either species (Figure 6).
Figure 5

Effect of climate extreme conditions in ambient and elevated CO2 on macronutrients and trace elements.

Climate conditions: ambient (A), drought and warming (DT), drought and warming in elevated CO2. Grassland species: Lolium perenne (Lp), Poa pratensis (Pp), Medicago lupulina (Ml) and Lotus corniculatus (Lc). The different panels show C (A), N (B), P (C), Mg (D), Na (E), Ca (F), K (G) and Mn (H). Different letters in the graph represent significant differences between A, DT and DTC at p<0.05.

Figure 6

Effect of climate extreme conditions in ambient and elevated CO2 on stoichiometric ratios.

Climate conditions: ambient (A), drought and warming (DT), drought and warming in elevated CO2. Grassland species: Lolium perenne (Lp), Poa pratensis (Pp), Medicago lupulina (Ml) and Lotus corniculatus (Lc). The different panels show C:N ratio (A), C:P ratio (B), N:P ratio (C), Element: P ratio (D) and Lignin: N ratio (E). Different letters in the graph represent significant differences between A, DT and DTC at p<0.05 (n = 4).

Effect of climate extreme conditions in ambient and elevated CO2 on macronutrients and trace elements.

Climate conditions: ambient (A), drought and warming (class="Chemical">DT), drought and warming in elevated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2. Grassland species: Lolium perenne (Lp), Poa pratensis (Pp), Medicago lupulina (Ml) and Lotus corniculatus (Lc). The different panels show C (A), N (B), P (C), Mg (D), Na (E), Ca (F), K (G) and Mn (H). Different letters in the graph represent significant differences between A, DT and DTC at p<0.05.

Effect of climate extreme conditions in ambient and elevated CO2 on stoichiometric ratios.

Climate conditions: ambient (A), drought and warming (class="Chemical">DT), drought and warming in elevated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2. Grassland species: Lolium perenne (Lp), Poa pratensis (Pp), Medicago lupulina (Ml) and Lotus corniculatus (Lc). The different panels show C:N ratio (A), C:P ratio (B), N:P ratio (C), Element: P ratio (D) and Lignin: N ratio (E). Different letters in the graph represent significant differences between A, DT and DTC at p<0.05 (n = 4). Elevated class="Chemical">CO2 in combination with climate extreme (class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">DTC) increased the content of C and N and decreased the concentrations of P and Mg in the legumes (Figure 5 A, B, C and D), relative to those in the extreme only (DT) treatment. Importantly, these decreases in P and Mg concentrations were not significant in the grasses. Elevated CO2 only affected element ratios in the legumes, but not in the grasses. The legumes showed significant increases in C:N and C:P ratios through the increased C concentration (Figure. 6A, B). The increased N:P ratio in legumes may in part be explained by increases in N content, but also results from a decreased P content (Figure. 5A). Also the total element:N ratio was reduced significantly by elevated CO2 in the two legumes (Figure 6D).

Are changes in enzyme activities and metabolites correlated?

To unravel the importance of the enzymes in controlling the respective class="Chemical">carbohydrate metabolite levels, a correlation analysis was class="Chemical">performed. There was a statistically significant, class="Chemical">positive correlation between the change in class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">sucrose phosphate synthase activity and the change in the sucrose content (Table 1, r = 0.872, p<0.05). We also found a positive correlation between sucrose synthase activity and starch content (Table 1, r = 0.549, p<0.05). Oppositely, there was no correlation between the invertases activities and the change in sucrose content. There was also a positive correlation between ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase activity and starch levels (Table 1, r = 0.739, p<0.05). Consistent with the absence of variation in the starch contents in both grasses, no effects of climate extreme and elevated CO2 conditions on ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase activity was observed.
Table 1

Correlations among various variables of four studied grassland species.

ParametersCelluloseSUSSucroseSPSNIAICWIStarchAGPASETotal SSFructanProteinLipidPhenolsPALLigninCAD
SUS0.874**
Sucrose0.0720.260
SPS1.000** 0.874** 0.872**
NI−0.068−0.014−0.070−0.068
AI0.018−0.095−0.2990.018−0.417
CWI−0.107−0.257−0.334−0.107−0.699** 0.668**
Starch0.1220.549* 0.781** 0.1220.143−0.364−0.559*
AGPASE0.259−0.0530.0240.259−0.706** 0.1940.4710.739**
Total SS0.004−0.115−0.0260.004−0.913** 0.4730.802** −0.3040.740**
Fructan0.1670.4300.891** 0.1670.096−0.319−0.531* 0.958** −0.243−0.245
Protein0.4870.182−0.3070.487−0.155−0.0150.159−0.3680.537* 0.170−0.528
Lipid0.0990.2860.654** 0.0990.500* −0.611* −0.802** 0.794** −0.414−0.689** 0.798** −0.188
Phenols0.021−0.0320.0590.021−0.6260.4020.713** −0.1400.415−0.0850.609* 0.072−0.324
PAL−0.1340.0790.564* −0.134−0.210−0.0800.1530.541* −0.1550.0740.559* −0.1770.3900.525*
Lignin0.0780.1660.641** 0.078−0.578−0.0550.2670.4130.3670.4550.466−0.0610.1720.638** 0.620*
CAD0.2360.2230.3260.236−0.089−0.0620.0220.0790.1420.1000.2020.0990.072−0.2700.0750.347
Tannin0.180−0.079−0.3850.180−0.283−0.0720.176−0.526* 0.551* 0.325−0.554* 0.205−0.4290.032−0.645** 0.023−0.207

**Correlation is significant at P<0.01 (2-tailed).

*Correlation is significant at P<0.05 level (2-tailed).

SUS =  Sucrose synthase, SPS =  Sucrose phosphate synthase, NI =  Neutral invertase, AI =  Acid invertase, CWI =  Cell wall invertase, AGPASE =  ADP-Glu pyrophosphorylase, Total SS =  Total soluble sugar, PAL =  Phenylalanine ammonialyase, CAD =  Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase.

**Correlation is significant at P<0.01 (2-tailed). *Correlation is significant at P<0.05 level (2-tailed). SUS =  class="Chemical">Sucrose synthase, Sclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PS =  Sucrose phosphate synthase, NI =  Neutral invertase, AI =  Acid invertase, CWI =  Cell wall invertase, AGPASE =  ADP-Glu pyrophosphorylase, Total SS =  Total soluble sugar, PAL =  Phenylalanine ammonialyase, CAD =  Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase. At the level of other metabolites and enzymes, we found a significant correlation between phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity and the class="Chemical">phenolic content (Table 1, r = 0.525, class="Chemical">p<0.05). However, desclass="Chemical">pite the observation that increases in the class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">lignin content in the two legume species were accompanied by higher cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase activity in climate extreme conditions, there was no strong correlation between lignin content and the enzyme activity (Table 1, r = 0.347, p<0.05). We also observed correlations between changes in metabolite levels. There was a negative correlation (Table 1, r = −0.528, p<0.05) acclass="Chemical">ross all sclass="Chemical">pecies, between the non-structural class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">carbohydrate and the protein content. This was particularly apparent in the legumes and suggests C being reallocated from proteins to sugars. Also, there was a strong correlation between accumulation of sucrose, soluble sugar and non-structural carbohydrate and the accumulation of polyphenols and tannins (Table 1, r = 0.822, 0.705 and 0.609 respectively, p<0.05).

Discussion

Climate extreme conditions affect plant chemical composition

To evaluate changes in grassland food properties, we analysed the class="Chemical">carbohydrate, class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">lipid, protein and element composition of four grassland species (L. perenne, P. pratensis, M. lupulina and L. corniculatus) subjected to a climate extreme, water deficit combined with elevated temperature (+3°C), under ambient and elevated CO2. In climate extreme conditions all plants accumulated more soluble sugars and polyphenols. In addition, the legumes also had increased lignin content and the grasses showed decreased tannin levels. These results are consistent with previous observations, such as increases in soluble sugars in Phaseolus vulgaris leaves under temperature stress [56], and increases in tannin, polyphenols and lignin as a result of drought and/or high temperature stress in Lotus, Lolium and Medicago [15], [34], [57], [58]. A reduction in tannin contents was also observed under drought stress in L. corniculatus leaves [18]. The climate extreme conditions did not affect insoluble class="Chemical">sugars, class="Chemical">proteins, class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">lipids and minerals, or plant (element) stoichiometric ratios. Similarly, little or no significant changes in total protein, mineral or starch were reported under drought stress in Lolium perenne and Tobacco plant [59], [60]. This is in contrast to results reported by others, in which water deficit stress induced changes in these parameters. For example, high temperature and drought, or their combination, increased starch content in M. sativa [15], and decreased protein and lipid contents in Leymus chinensis and soybean [1], [14]. The variations in responses at the plant composition level may be attributed to variation in the magnitude of the stress conditions, as well as to different plant species. The accumulation of soluble class="Chemical">sugars and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">polyphenols, in adverse climate conditions, are probably examples of adaptive protection strategies [61], [62]. Polyphenols constitute a large group of diverse molecules, implemented in ROS detoxification and in the protection of the photosynthetic apparatus [63], [64]. Higher amounts of soluble sugars provide more substrate for other defense responses [65]. However, these changes in chemical composition not only enhance plant protection, they will likely also affect the nutritional value and digestibility of these species [2], [3]. Accumulation of polyphenols (toxic compounds) and lignin (indigestible fiber) decreased plant quality in economic point of view [66], [67], [68]. Polyphenols can also retard microbial and enzymatic decomposition by forming resistant compounds or by inhibiting microbial activity [20], [69]. The stress-induced increase in polyphenols is probably explained by parallel increases in phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity, a key enzyme in polyphenol biosynthesis [61] (e.g. Table 1).

Elevated CO2 alters the climate extreme impact

With the continued rise in atmospheric class="Chemical">CO2, the effect of climate extremes is best evaluated against an elevated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2 background. In L. perenne, P. pratensis, M. lupulina and L. corniculatus, elevated CO2 in climate extreme conditions enhanced several aspects of the carbohydrate and secondary metabolite metabolism. In the legumes, significant increases in the soluble sugar, starch, cellulose, structural carbohydrate, polyphenol and tannin contents were observed. On the other hand, in the grasses, combination of elevated CO2 with climate extremes increased sucrose and fructan contents and reduced hexoses. Increases in structural and non-structural class="Chemical">carbohydrates due to class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2 enrichment have been reported, and may be explained by higher carbohydrate assimilation rates [70], [71], [72]. The carbohydrate accumulation in legumes was accompanied by increased activities of sucrose phosphate synthase and ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase (Figure 2) as was also previously observed in Phaseolus leaves [56]. Interestingly, it appears a switch occurred in cytosolic sucrose catabolism from neutral invertase to sucrose synthase in the legumes, but not in the grasses (Figure. 2). Increased sucrose synthase activities are also linked to increased starch synthesis, although the underlying mechanisms require further exploration [73], [74]. L. perenne and P. pratensis are fructan-accumulating grasses, and elevated CO2 has previously been observed to allocate to fructans in fructan accumulators [24], [75]. At the level of secondary metabolites, there is a notable increase in class="Chemical">tannin and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">lignin content, under stress in elevated CO2 conditions in the legumes. Similar observations have been attributed to increased shikimate metabolism in high C availability [76], [77]. The accumulation of tannins in legumes can retard decomposition [20], [23], [68]. Frequently observed changes in tissue chemistry, induced by changing climate conditions e.g., elevated class="Chemical">CO2 and/or drought and temclass="Chemical">perature, include decreases in class="Chemical">protein content [7], [8], [14]. In our exclass="Chemical">periclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">ment, elevated CO2 in climate extreme reduced protein level mostly in the legumes (Figure. 3). A decrease in tissue protein content lowers its nutritive quality [68], [78]. Given the increases in carbohydrates, it appears that the part of the tissue C is reallocated from proteins to carbohydrates under elevated CO2 in the legumes. Importantly, fructan-accumulating grasses did not show such decreased protein levels under elevated CO2. It can be speculated that these species keep their C fluxes towards fructans and polyphenols (as stress tolerance contributors) and proteins (economic importance), while they are diverting none (or less) extra C to cellulose, other structural carbohydrates, lignins and tannins. Overall, strong correlations were observed between accumulation of class="Chemical">sucrose, total soluble class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">sugar and non-structural carbohydrate and the accumulation of polyphenols. It is well-known that sucrose specific signalling mechanisms trigger polyphenol synthesis pathways [26], [79]. In Arabidopsis, soluble sugars, anthocyanins and proline typically increase together under water-deficit stress [79], and in chicory, exogenous sucrose feeding leads to the combined increase in polyphenols and fructans [80]. In addition to their direct ROS scavenging effects, fructans are recently proposed as (secondary) stress signals stimulating innate immunity responses, in plants and animals [26], [80]. Both fructans and polyphenols, such as anthocyanins, might play roles both in abiotic and biotic stress responses [81]. Increasing class="Chemical">CO2 under climate extreme did not affect the eleclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">ment composition in the grasses, but several elements, most prominently C and N increased, and P and Mg decreased, in the legumes (Figure. 5). In general, reductions in P and Mg in legumes could lower their food quality for herbivores [82], [83]. As a result of the changes in P, also the C:P and N:P ratios change considerably in the legumes. Elevated CO2 has often been observed to decrease nutrient concentrations of plant tissues [84]. These stress and climate-induced stoichiometry changes are therefore likely to affect food nutritional quality and decomposition [82], [83], [85], [21]. Under combination of elevated class="Chemical">CO2 concentration with drought or temclass="Chemical">perature, class="Chemical">plants tyclass="Chemical">pically show increased tissue C concentrations [24], [86], with corresclass="Chemical">pondingly reduced concentrations of other eleclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">ments, including N [87], and several trace elements [85]. In agreement [30], we also found that elevated CO2 in climate extreme increased C:P and N:P ratios in legumes only. The increase in C:P ratio (e.g. Figure 6B, is not only explained by elevated C accumulation, but also by a lower P content. The lignin:N ratio is another factor that could affect decomposition rates [88], but this parameter did not change considerably in extreme climate conditions.

Climate extreme and elevated CO2 effects are species-group specific

class="Chemical">Plant resclass="Chemical">ponses to climate change is comclass="Chemical">plicated by significant ‘sclass="Chemical">pecies x climate’ interactions and show sclass="Chemical">pecies-grouclass="Chemical">p sclass="Chemical">pecific resclass="Chemical">ponses. For examclass="Chemical">ple, class="Chemical">plant functional tyclass="Chemical">pes differed in their stoichiometric ratios under elevated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2 [30]. Also, fructan accumulating grasses showed higher tissue quality than non-fructan accumulators and showed increase in proteins and fructans levels under elevated CO2 [33]. Accumulation of fructan content in species, improve their protein utilization by livestock [89] and digestibility by ruminants [29], [33]. For this reason we estimated responses of different species to climate change conditions. Grasses and legumes responded differently to extreme climate conditions and elevated class="Chemical">CO2 in various tissue comclass="Chemical">position class="Chemical">parameters. At the level of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">carbohydrate metabolism, soluble sugar levels were stress-induced in all species. However, fructan levels were only increased in the grasses. Moreover, elevated CO2 also affected sugar metabolism differentially between legumes and grasses, with a noteworthy shift in sugar metabolism in the legumes, where non-structural and structural carbohydrates were increased. At least parts of these differences relate to the N-fixing potential, supporting more and higher C sinks [90]. Consistently, interactive effects of elevated CO2 and plant species on starch and sugar concentrations were observed in previous study [91]. Also other tissue composition parameters were affected differently between these species groups, in particular at elevated class="Chemical">CO2. For examclass="Chemical">ple, in contrast to the grasses, class="Chemical">protein, class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">P and Mg levels decreased, and polyphenol, tannin and lignin levels increased in the legumes under climate extreme and elevated CO2. Moreover, in legumes element's stoichiometry were affected (C:N, C:P, N:P and element:N). As legume are N-fixing species, high N and low P content resulted in a high N:P ratio compared to grasses. This increase was also observed in previous studies [30], [91]. Togclass="Chemical">ether, these findings suggest that future climate elevated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2, combined with climate extreme conditions, may reduce tissue digestibility and quality of legume species. It also appears that the fructan accumulating grasses preserved their tissue quality (protein, macro and micronutrients) better under stress and elevated CO2, partially at the expense of the deposition of cell wall materials. This observation fits with reports that fructan accumulating plants such as chicory behave well under stress [92], but show a growth lag phase possibly related to slower deposition of new cell wall materials [93], [94]. It can be speculated that fructan accumulators invest more in defense responses during early developmental stages, even in the absence of stress. This is consistent with the strongly increased cell wall invertase activities in fructan accumulators (Figure 2D). Increased cell wall invertase activities are typically associated with stress responses [95] and tolerant genotypes maintain higher cell wall invertase activities, even in the absence of stress [96]. Cell wall invertases are emerging as important regulators of apoplastic sugar homeostasis [97] associated with altered sugar signaling events and C partitioning [79], [26], [96].

Conclusions and perspectives

The effect of climate extreme treatclass="Species">ment (class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">water deficit at elevated background temperature) was more pronounced at elevated CO2, in particular in legumes. Interactions between elevated CO2 and climate extremes were observed in many cases, where elevated CO2 amplified or reduced the impact of the climate extreme. The results also support the importance of the variation in responses among species groups. Growth of legumes under extreme climate and elevated CO2 conditions resulted in large compositional changes, while minor changes in tissue chemistry of the fructan-accumulating grasses were observed. This suggests that quality losses may be more prominent in non-fructan accumulators. Further research is needed to the roles of fructans as antioxidants and putative (stress) signals affecting C partitioning. For this purpose, metabolite pools in fructan-accumulating transgenic crops and wild-type crops should be rigorously compared under stress and/or elevated CO2 conditions. Experipan class="Species">mental design. Design of the 16 climate-controlled chambers (A) and internal arrangeclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">ment of pots in chamber 1 (B). (EPS) Click here for additional data file. Effect of climate extreme on photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. Climate conditions: ambient (A), drought and warming (class="Chemical">DT), drought and warming in elevated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">CO2] Grassland species: Lolium perenne (Lp), Poa pratensis (Pp), Medicago lupulina (Ml) and Lotus corniculatus (Lc). The different panels show photosynthesis (A) and stomatal conductance (B) after 0,1,2 and 3 weeks of drought stress. (EPS) Click here for additional data file.
  42 in total

1.  Whole-system responses of experimental plant communities to climate extremes imposed in different seasons.

Authors:  Hans J De Boeck; Freja E Dreesen; Ivan A Janssens; Ivan Nijs
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  Elevated CO2 induces physiological, biochemical and structural changes in leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Nianjun Teng; Jian Wang; Tong Chen; Xiaoqin Wu; Yuhua Wang; Jinxing Lin
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 3.  Effects of fructans-type prebiotics on lipid metabolism.

Authors:  N M Delzenne; N Kok
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Alfalfa forage digestibility, quality and yield under future climate change scenarios vary with Sinorhizobium meliloti strain.

Authors:  Álvaro Sanz-Sáez; Gorka Erice; Jone Aguirreolea; Fernando Muñoz; Manuel Sánchez-Díaz; Juan José Irigoyen
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.549

5.  Sugar homeostasis mediated by cell wall invertase GRAIN INCOMPLETE FILLING 1 (GIF1) plays a role in pre-existing and induced defence in rice.

Authors:  Li Sun; Dong-lei Yang; Yu Kong; Ying Chen; Xiao-Zun Li; Long-Jun Zeng; Qun Li; Er-Tao Wang; Zu-Hua He
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.663

6.  Stoichiometric response of nitrogen-fixing and non-fixing dicots to manipulations of CO2, nitrogen, and diversity.

Authors:  Amy M Novotny; John D Schade; Sarah E Hobbie; Adam D Kay; Marcia Kyle; Peter B Reich; James J Elser
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Tissue chemistry and carbon allocation in seedlings of Pinus palustris subjected to elevated atmospheric CO(2) and water stress.

Authors:  G. B. Runion; J. A. Entry; S. A. Prior; R. J. Mitchell; H. H. Rogers
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.196

8.  Effect of elevated CO₂ and temperature on the oxidative stress response to drought in Lolium perenne L. and Medicago sativa L.

Authors:  Evelyn Roxana Farfan-Vignolo; Han Asard
Journal:  Plant Physiol Biochem       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.270

9.  Dietary phosphorus affects the growth of larval Manduca sexta.

Authors:  Marc C Perkins; H Arthur Woods; Jon F Harrison; James J Elser
Journal:  Arch Insect Biochem Physiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.698

10.  High invertase activity in tomato reproductive organs correlates with enhanced sucrose import into, and heat tolerance of, young fruit.

Authors:  Zhimiao Li; William M Palmer; Antony P Martin; Rongqing Wang; Frederick Rainsford; Ye Jin; John W Patrick; Yuejian Yang; Yong-Ling Ruan
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  17 in total

1.  Virulence Genes Analysis of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Anti-vibrio Activity of the Citrus Extracts.

Authors:  Chatchawan Singhapol; Sirikhwan Tinrat
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Grassland species differentially regulate proline concentrations under future climate conditions: an integrated biochemical and modelling approach.

Authors:  Hamada AbdElgawad; Dirk De Vos; Gaurav Zinta; Malgorzata A Domagalska; Gerrit T S Beemster; Han Asard
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Fructan metabolism and changes in fructan composition during cold acclimation in perennial ryegrass.

Authors:  Shamila W Abeynayake; Thomas P Etzerodt; Kristina Jonavičienė; Stephen Byrne; Torben Asp; Birte Boelt
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Dynamics of metabolic responses to periods of combined heat and drought in Arabidopsis thaliana under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  Gaurav Zinta; Hamada AbdElgawad; Darin Peshev; James T Weedon; Wim Van den Ende; Ivan Nijs; Ivan A Janssens; Gerrit T S Beemster; Han Asard
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Phytochemical profiling, antioxidant and antibacterial efficacy of a native Himalayan Fern: Woodwardia unigemmata (Makino) Nakai.

Authors:  Poonam Takuli; Kapil Khulbe; Parikshit Kumar; Archana Parki; Asad Syed; Abdallah M Elgorban
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Effect of nitrogen application rate on yield, forage quality, and animal performance in a tropical pasture.

Authors:  Lutti M Delevatti; Abmael S Cardoso; Rondineli P Barbero; Rhaony G Leite; Eliéder P Romanzini; Ana C Ruggieri; Ricardo A Reis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Metabolite profiling and transcript analysis reveal specificities in the response of a berry derived cell culture to abiotic stresses.

Authors:  Biruk Ayenew; Asfaw Degu; Neta Manela; Avichai Perl; Michal O Shamir; Aaron Fait
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 8.  Response and adaptation of photosynthesis, respiration, and antioxidant systems to elevated CO2 with environmental stress in plants.

Authors:  Zhenzhu Xu; Yanling Jiang; Guangsheng Zhou
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Elevated CO2 Atmosphere Minimizes the Effect of Drought on the Cerrado Species Chrysolaena obovata.

Authors:  Vanessa F Oliveira; Emerson A Silva; Maria A M Carvalho
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Codominant grasses differ in gene expression under experimental climate extremes in native tallgrass prairie.

Authors:  Ava M Hoffman; Meghan L Avolio; Alan K Knapp; Melinda D Smith
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.