Literature DB >> 24669742

Environmental context influences both the intensity of seed predation and plant demographic sensitivity to attack.

Tove Von Euler, Jon Agren, Johan Ehrlén.   

Abstract

Variation in mutualistic and antagonistic interactions are important sources of variation in population dynamics and natural selection. Environmental heterogeneity can influence the outcome of interactions by affecting the intensity of interactions, but also by affecting the demography of the populations involved. However, little is known about the relative importance of environmental effects on interaction intensities and demographic sensitivity for variation in population growth rates. We investigated how soil depth, soil moisture, soil nutrient composition, and vegetation height influenced the intensity of seed predation as well as host plant demography and sensitivity to seed predation in the perennial herb Primula farinosa. Intensity of seed predation ranged from 0% to 80% of seeds damaged among the 24 study populations and was related to soil moisture in two of four years. The effect of seed predation on plant population growth rate (lambda) ranged from negligible to a reduction in lambda by 0.70. Sensitivity of population growth rate to predation explained as much of the variation in the reductions in population growth rate due to seed predation as did predation intensity. Plant population growth rate in the absence of seed predation and sensitivity to predation were negatively related to soil depth and soil moisture. Both intensity of predation and sensitivity to predation were positively correlated with potential population growth rate and, as a result, there was no significant relationship between predation intensity and realized population growth rate. We conclude that in our study system environmental context influences the effects of seed predation on plant fitness and population dynamics in two important ways: through variation in interaction intensity and through sensitivity to the effects of this interaction. Moreover, our results show that a given abiotic factor can influence population growth rate in different directions through effects on potential growth rate, intensity of biotic interactions, and the sensitivity of population growth rate to interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24669742     DOI: 10.1890/13-0528.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  8 in total

1.  Biotic context and soil properties modulate native plant responses to enhanced rainfall.

Authors:  Anu Eskelinen; Susan Harrison
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  The effects of invertebrate herbivores on plant population growth: a meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Daniel S W Katz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Cumulative herbivory outpaces compensation for early floral damage on a monocarpic perennial thistle.

Authors:  Natalie M West; Svata M Louda
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Herbivory strongly influences among-population variation in reproductive output of Lythrum salicaria in its native range.

Authors:  Lina Lehndal; Peter A Hambäck; Lars Ericson; Jon Ågren
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Poor Fertility, Short Longevity, and Low Abundance in the Soil Seed Bank Limit Volunteer Sugarcane from Seed.

Authors:  Johann S Pierre; Jai Perroux; Alex Whan; Anne L Rae; Graham D Bonnett
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-06-04

6.  Herbivory Differentially Affects Plant Fitness in Three Populations of the Perennial Herb Lythrum salicaria along a Latitudinal Gradient.

Authors:  Lina Lehndal; Jon Ågren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The influence of herbivory and weather on the vital rates of two closely related cactus species.

Authors:  Kristen E Sauby; John Kilmer; Mary C Christman; Robert D Holt; Travis D Marsico
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Accelerated flowering time reduces lifetime water use without penalizing reproductive performance in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  John N Ferguson; Rhonda C Meyer; Kieron D Edwards; Matt Humphry; Oliver Brendel; Ulrike Bechtold
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 7.228

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.