OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate prevalence based on variations in case definitions used for epidemiological studies of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). BACKGROUND: Prior studies of MSDs have mostly relied on a single case definition based on questionnaires. METHOD: In a multicenter prospective cohort study, we systematically collected data to evaluate impacts of differences in case definitions of MSDs on prevalence of three common musculoskeletal disorders: (a) shoulder tendinosis, (b) lateral epicondylalgia, and (c) carpal tunnel syndrome. Production workers were from 21 employment settings in three diverse U.S. states and performed widely varying work. All workers completed laptop-administered structured interviews, two standardized physical examinations, and nerve conduction studies (NCS). Case definitions included symptoms only, and symptoms plus physical examinations and/or NCS. RESULTS: A total of 1,227 subjects had complete health data at baseline. The prevalence for shoulder tendinosis is 23.0% if only glenohumeral pain is used for a case definition, compared with 8.0% if a combination of pain plus a positive supraspinatus test is used. The prevalence for lateral epicondylalgia varied on the basis of lateral elbow pain (12.0%), pain plus tenderness on palpation (9.9%), or pain plus tenderness on palpation plus resisted wrist or middle finger extension (3.5%). Carpal tunnel syndrome prevalence varied on the basis of tingling or numbness in a median nerve-served digit (29.9%) or tingling or numbness plus NCS abnormalities consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome (9.0%). CONCLUSION: Variations in epidemiological case definitions have major impacts on prevalence of common MSDs. Wide-ranging differences in prevalence may have impacts on purported risk factors that need to be determined.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate prevalence based on variations in case definitions used for epidemiological studies of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). BACKGROUND: Prior studies of MSDs have mostly relied on a single case definition based on questionnaires. METHOD: In a multicenter prospective cohort study, we systematically collected data to evaluate impacts of differences in case definitions of MSDs on prevalence of three common musculoskeletal disorders: (a) shoulder tendinosis, (b) lateral epicondylalgia, and (c) carpal tunnel syndrome. Production workers were from 21 employment settings in three diverse U.S. states and performed widely varying work. All workers completed laptop-administered structured interviews, two standardized physical examinations, and nerve conduction studies (NCS). Case definitions included symptoms only, and symptoms plus physical examinations and/or NCS. RESULTS: A total of 1,227 subjects had complete health data at baseline. The prevalence for shoulder tendinosis is 23.0% if only glenohumeral pain is used for a case definition, compared with 8.0% if a combination of pain plus a positive supraspinatus test is used. The prevalence for lateral epicondylalgia varied on the basis of lateral elbow pain (12.0%), pain plus tenderness on palpation (9.9%), or pain plus tenderness on palpation plus resisted wrist or middle finger extension (3.5%). Carpal tunnel syndrome prevalence varied on the basis of tingling or numbness in a median nerve-served digit (29.9%) or tingling or numbness plus NCS abnormalities consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome (9.0%). CONCLUSION: Variations in epidemiological case definitions have major impacts on prevalence of common MSDs. Wide-ranging differences in prevalence may have impacts on purported risk factors that need to be determined.
Authors: Waleed Umer; Maxwell F Antwi-Afari; Heng Li; Grace P Y Szeto; Arnold Y L Wong Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Francesca de Brito Magalhães; Mônica Angelim Gomes de Lima; Robson da Fonseca Neves; Katia Costa-Black; Tânia Maria de Araújo; Lauro Antonio Porto Journal: Rev Bras Med Trab Date: 2019-12-01
Authors: Matthew S Thiese; Kurt T Hegmann; Eric M Wood; Arun Garg; J Steven Moore; Jay Kapellusch; James Foster; Ulrike Ott Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Sietske J Tamminga; P Paul F M Kuijer; Kathryn Badarin; Jose Hernán Alfonso; Joana Amaro; Stefania Curti; Irina Guseva Canu; Stefano Mattioli; Ingrid S Mehlum; David Rempel; Yves Roquelaure; Steven Visser; Henk F van der Molen Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-12-04 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Alysha R Meyers; Steven J Wurzelbacher; Edward F Krieg; Jessica G Ramsey; Kenneth Crombie; Annette L Christianson; Lian Luo; Susan Burt Journal: Hum Factors Date: 2021-06-20 Impact factor: 2.888
Authors: Matthew S Thiese; Fred Gerr; Kurt T Hegmann; Carisa Harris-Adamson; Ann Marie Dale; Bradley Evanoff; Ellen A Eisen; Jay Kapellusch; Arun Garg; Susan Burt; Stephen Bao; Barbara Silverstein; Linda Merlino; David Rempel Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Dong Kyu Moon; Young Jin Park; Sang Youn Song; Mi Ji Kim; Jin Sung Park; Dae Cheol Nam; Dong Hee Kim; Jae Boem Na; Sang Il Lee; Sun Chul Hwang; Ki Soo Park Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.759