Literature DB >> 24669507

Age differences in subjective well-being across adulthood: the roles of savoring and future time perspective.

Meagan A Ramsey, Amy L Gentzler.   

Abstract

Prior research indicates there are age differences in subjective well-being during adulthood, but research on age differences in savoring (up-regulating positive emotion) is lacking. Using an online survey (N = 218, adults 18-77), this study investigated age differences in subjective well-being and savoring, and whether future time perspective (perceived amount of time left to live) mediated associations between age and savoring. Results indicated a nonlinear effect of age on subjective well-being. Although savoring was associated with subjective well-being, age was not directly associated with savoring. However, an indirect effect of future time perspective linking age and savoring indicated that younger adults reported more perceived time left in life and those perceiving more time left in life reported greater savoring. Overall, the results do not support savoring as a direct explanatory mechanism for age differences in subjective well-being, but future time perspective appears to play an important role in indirect associations between age and savoring.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24669507     DOI: 10.2190/AG.78.1.b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev        ISSN: 0091-4150


  10 in total

1.  Examination on how emotion regulation mediates the relationship between future time perspective and well-being: a counter-evidence to the socioemotional selectivity theory.

Authors:  Ryota Sakakibara; Yu Ishii
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2019-07-02

2.  Beliefs about savoring in older adulthood: Aging and perceived health affect temporal components of perceived savoring ability.

Authors:  Paul J Geiger; Jennifer N Morey; Suzanne C Segerstrom
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2016-10-01

3.  The Impact of Air Pollution on Residents' Happiness: A Study on the Moderating Effect Based on Pollution Sensitivity.

Authors:  Xuan Tian; Cheng Zhang; Bing Xu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Hour glass half full or half empty? Future time perspective and preoccupation with negative events across the life span.

Authors:  JoNell Strough; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Andrew M Parker; Philip Lemaster; Nipat Pichayayothin; Rebecca Delaney
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-06-06

5.  Links between Savoring, Rumination, and Sleep-Related Experiences across Adulthood: Implications for Older Adults.

Authors:  Caitlan A Tighe; Natalie D Dautovich; Michelle M Hilgeman; Rebecca S Allen
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 2.619

Review 6.  Current Progress and Future Directions for Theory and Research on Savoring.

Authors:  Fred B Bryant
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-14

7.  Predicting Negative and Positive Affect During COVID-19: A Daily Diary Study in Youths.

Authors:  Wisteria Deng; Reuma Gadassi Polack; Mackenzie Creighton; Hedy Kober; Jutta Joormann
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2021-09

8.  Present hedonism and future time perspectives predicting hypersexuality and problematic pornography use.

Authors:  Mónika Koós; Gábor Orosz; Zsolt Demetrovics; Beáta Bőthe
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 5.435

9.  Perceived Collective School Efficacy Mediates the Organizational Justice Effect in Teachers' Subjective Well-Being.

Authors:  Camilo Herrera; Javier Torres-Vallejos; Jonathan Martínez-Líbano; Andrés Rubio; Cristian Céspedes; Juan Carlos Oyanedel; Eduardo Acuña; Danae Pedraza
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.614

10.  Exploring the Association between Life Perceptions and Emotional Profiles in Taiwan: Empirical Evidence from the National Well-Being Indicators Survey.

Authors:  Mei-Yin Kuan; Jiun-Hao Wang; Yu-Chang Liou; Li-Pei Peng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.