| Literature DB >> 24669266 |
Eva Blahová1, Jan Máchal2, Ladislav Máchal1, Irena Milaković1, Sárka Hanuláková1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to test whether it is possible to eliminate a high percentage of morphologically abnormal sperm in male ejaculate by assisted reproduction using the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) method. Treatment success was evaluated by comparing fertilization, clinical pregnancy and reproduction rates between males with heavy teratospermia (≤1% morphologically normal spermatozoa) and males with a higher percentage (>1%) of normal sperm. In total, 174 patients who had previously undergone 174 ICSI cycles (1 per each pair) were evaluated retrospectively. In the group of patients with heavily impaired sperm morphology (n=37), the percentage of normal spermatozoa was ≤1%. In the second group, males with >1% normal spermatozoa (n=137) were considered as patients with mildly impaired sperm morphology. The results of partner fertilization in these two groups were compared and a lower number of fertilized oocytes was identified in the patients with heavily impaired sperm morphology (P=0.038). However, neither the gravidity nor the take-home baby rates of the partners differed between the patients with mildly and heavily impaired sperm morphology. Trends opposite to that for fertilization were observed for gravidity and delivery [odds ratio (OR), 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-1.30; OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.26-1.24, respectively]. This indicates that the lower number of fertilized oocytes was not associated with the overall outcome of fertilization and that patients with heavily impaired sperm morphology experience the same benefit from ICSI as patients with mildly impaired sperm morphology.Entities:
Keywords: intracytoplasmic sperm injections; pregnancy rate; reproduction rate; sperm morphology
Year: 2014 PMID: 24669266 PMCID: PMC3964931 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.1522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Basic characteristics of the male subjects and their partners during intervention.
| Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| Male age, years | 34.9±2.8 |
| Female age, years | 30.5±2.7 |
| Normal spermatozoa, % | 11 (3–21) |
| Oocytes, n | 25±8 |
| Mature oocytes, n | 16±6 |
| Fertilized oocytes, n | 12 (9–17) |
Normal distribution values are listed as mean ± SD.
Non-normal distribution values are listed as median (lower quartile-upper quartile).
Characteristics and the outcome of fertilization in patients with mildly and heavily defective spermatozoa.
| Morphology | Heavily defective (≤1% normal spermatozoa) | Mildly defective (>1% normal spermatozoa) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 35.3±3.1 | 34.8±2.7 | 0.339 |
| Oocytes, n | 26±7 | 24±8 | 0.271 |
| Mature oocytes, n | 15±6 | 16±6 | 0.192 |
| Fertilized oocytes, n | 10 (9–13) | 13 (9–17) | 0.038 |
| Pregnancy rates, present/absent | 23/14 | 69/68 | 0.266 |
| Delivery, present/absent | 22/15 | 61/76 | 0.138 |
Values with normal distribution are listed as mean ± SD.
Non-normal distribution values are listed as median (lower quartile-upper quartile).
Figure 1Number of fertilized oocytes in the partners of patients with heavily and mildly defective spermatozoa.