Literature DB >> 24668843

Segmental composite porous scaffolds with either osteogenesis or anti-bone resorption properties tested in a rabbit ulna defect model.

Shihui Chen1,2, Poying Lau1, Ming Lei3, Jiang Peng1, Tao Tang1, Xiaohong Wang4, Ling Qin1,5, Shekhar-Madhukar Kumta1.   

Abstract

A functional biomaterial with a therapeutic effect is desirable as an adjuvant therapy to enhance bone formation and prevent local recurrence of bone tumours, especially when the resection margins are not identifiable. In this study, novel composite materials were developed with dual properties of osteopromotion and bone resorption to mimic the tumour inhibition effect, including water-soluble phosphorylated chitosan (P-chitosan) for increasing osteoblasts activity and disodium (1 → 4)-2-deoxy-2-sulphoamino-β-d-glucopyranuronan (S-chitosan) for inhibiting bone resorption activity. First, P-chitosan and S-chitosan were respectively incorporated into two kinds of PLGA/TCP-based scaffold, i.e. PLGA-TCP-P-chitosan (P/T/P-chitosan) and PLGA-TCP-S-chitosan (P/T/S-chitosan) scaffolds. We subsequently tested combined scaffolds of PLGA-TCP-P-S-P-chitosan (P/T/PSP-chitosan) made of P/T/P-chitosan and P/T/S-chitosan to assess their integral effect, on enhancement of bone formation with P/T/P-chitosan and inhibition of tissue regeneration with P/T/S-chitosan, in an established rabbit ulnar bone defect model to imitate bone resection post-bone tumour. To compare bone healing in the defects, the P/T/P-chitosan group was regarded as a bone formation enhancement group, while the P/T group served as a control. Bone mineral density (BMD) in the P/T/P-chitosan and P/T/PSP-chitosan groups were found to be significantly higher than those in the P/T group, while that in the P/T/P-chitosan group was greater than that in the P/T/PSP-chitosan group (p < 0.05). These findings demonstrated that P/T/PSP-chitosan scaffolds possessed more osteogenic potential than the P/T scaffold but less osteogenic effect than the P/T/P-chitosan scaffold, as the S-chitosan component inhibited the activities of osteoblasts for bone formation. These findings implied a dual function of the designed P/T/PSP-chitosan for further preclinical validation and potential applications in the prevention of local recurrence and for enhancing bone repair after bone tumour resection.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P-chitosan; S-chitosan; bone regeneration; critical-sized bone defect

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24668843     DOI: 10.1002/term.1828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  5 in total

Review 1.  Chitosan-Based Biomaterial Scaffolds for the Repair of Infected Bone Defects.

Authors:  Yuhang Tian; Danhua Wu; Dankai Wu; Yutao Cui; Guangkai Ren; Yanbing Wang; Jincheng Wang; Chuangang Peng
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Bioactive PLGA/tricalcium phosphate scaffolds incorporating phytomolecule icaritin developed for calvarial defect repair in rat model.

Authors:  Guang-Sen Shi; Ying-Ying Li; Ya-Ping Luo; Jian-Feng Jin; Yu-Xin Sun; Li-Zhen Zheng; Yu-Xiao Lai; Long Li; Guo-Hui Fu; Ling Qin; Shi-Hui Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  MicroRNA-130a controls bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell differentiation towards the osteoblastic and adipogenic fate.

Authors:  Zhangyuan Lin; Hongbo He; Min Wang; Jieyu Liang
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 6.831

4.  Research hotspots and trends of bone defects based on Web of Science: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Haixiong Lin; Xiaotong Wang; Minling Huang; Zige Li; Zhen Shen; Junjie Feng; Huamei Chen; Jingjing Wu; Junyan Gao; Zheng Wen; Feng Huang; Ziwei Jiang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Biological Evaluation of Flexible Polyurethane/Poly l-Lactic Acid Composite Scaffold as a Potential Filler for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Yuk Fai Lui; Wing Yuk Ip
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.