Literature DB >> 24668129

Neural representation of muscle dynamics in voluntary movement control.

Christopher J Hasson1.   

Abstract

Several theories of motor control posit that the nervous system has access to a neural representation of muscle dynamics. Yet, this has not been tested experimentally. Should such a representation exist, it was hypothesized that subjects who learned to control a virtual limb using virtual muscles would improve performance faster and show greater generalization than those who learned with a less dynamically complex virtual force generator. Healthy adults practiced using their biceps brachii activity to move a myoelectrically controlled virtual limb from rest to a standard target position with maximum speed and accuracy. Throughout practice, generalization was assessed with untrained target trials and sensitivity to actuator dynamics was probed by unexpected actuator model switches. In a muscle model subject group (n = 10), the biceps electromyographic signal activated a virtual muscle that pulled on the virtual limb with a force governed by muscle dynamics, defined by a nonlinear force-length-velocity relation and series elastic stiffness. A force generator group (n = 10) performed the same task, but the actuation force was a linear function of the biceps activation signal. Both groups made significant errors with unexpected actuator dynamics switches, supporting task sensitivity to actuator dynamics. The muscle model group improved performance as fast as the force generator group and showed greater generalization in early practice, despite using an actuator with more complex dynamics. These results are consistent with a preexisting neural representation of muscle dynamics, which may have offset any learning challenges associated with the more dynamically complex virtual muscle model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24668129     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3901-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  49 in total

1.  Inter- and intra-limb generalization of adaptation during catching.

Authors:  S M Morton; C E Lang; A J Bastian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A new method for the simultaneous measurement of the movement of inertia, the damping coefficient and the location of the centre of mass of a body segment in situ.

Authors:  H Hatze
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1975-12-05

3.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Muscle mechanics and neuromuscular control.

Authors:  A L Hof
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Energy margins in dynamic object manipulation.

Authors:  Christopher J Hasson; Tian Shen; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Intrinsic muscle properties facilitate locomotor control - a computer simulation study.

Authors:  K G Gerritsen; A J van den Bogert; M Hulliger; R F Zernicke
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.422

7.  Control of position and movement is simplified by combined muscle spindle and Golgi tendon organ feedback.

Authors:  Dinant A Kistemaker; Arthur J Knoek Van Soest; Jeremy D Wong; Isaac Kurtzer; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres.

Authors:  A M Gordon; A F Huxley; F J Julian
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Proportional myoelectric control of a virtual object to investigate human efferent control.

Authors:  Keith E Gordon; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Formation and lateralization of internal representations underlying motor commands during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; N Iwasaki
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of kinematic vibrotactile feedback on learning to control a virtual prosthetic arm.

Authors:  Christopher J Hasson; Julia Manczurowsky
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 2.  Elucidating Sensorimotor Control Principles with Myoelectric Musculoskeletal Models.

Authors:  Sarah E Goodman; Christopher J Hasson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Visual programming for accessible interactive musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  Julia Manczurowsky; Mansi Badadhe; Christopher J Hasson
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-03-22

4.  Neural Control Adaptation to Motor Noise Manipulation.

Authors:  Christopher J Hasson; Olga Gelina; Garrett Woo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  G-Causality Brain Connectivity Differences of Finger Movements between Motor Execution and Motor Imagery.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Jiaxin Zhang; Abdelkader Nasreddine Belkacem; Shanting Zhang; Rui Xu; Bin Hao; Qiang Gao; Duk Shin; Changming Wang; Dong Ming
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 2.682

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.