| Literature DB >> 24667587 |
Adiël A Klompmaker1, Pedro Artal2, Barry W M van Bakel3, René H B Fraaije4, John W M Jagt5.
Abstract
Parasites are common in modern ecosystems and are also known from the fossil record. One of the best preserved and easily recognisable examples of parasitism in the fossil record concerns isopod-induced swellings in the branchial chamber of marine decapod crustaceans. However, very limited quantitative data on the variability of infestation percentages at the species, genus, and family levels are available. Here we provide this type of data for a mid-Cretaceous (upper Lower Cretaceous, upper Albian) reef setting at Koskobilo, northern Spain, on the basis of 874 specimens of anomurans and brachyurans. Thirty-seven specimens (4.2%), arranged in ten species, are infested. Anomurans are more heavily infested than brachyurans, variability can be high within genera, and a relationship may exist between the number of specimens and infestation percentage per taxon, possibly suggesting host-specificity. We have also investigated quantitative patterns of infestation through geological time based on 88 infested species (25 anomurans, 55 brachyurans, seven lobsters, and one shrimp), to show that the highest number of infested species can be found in the Late Jurassic, also when corrected for the unequal duration of epochs. The same Late Jurassic peak is observed for the percentage of infested decapod species per epoch. This acme is caused entirely by infested anomurans and brachyurans. Biases (taphonomic and otherwise) and causes of variability with regard to the Koskobilo assemblage and infestation patterns through time are discussed. Finally, a new ichnogenus and -species, Kanthyloma crusta, are erected to accommodate such swellings or embedment structures (bioclaustrations).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24667587 PMCID: PMC3965447 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092551
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Examples of isopod-infested decapods from the modern environment.
A, Galathea sp., Camiguin, Philippines (MAB k. 3297); B, Pachycheles garciaensis [122], Camiguin, Philippines (MAB k. 3298); C, Eumedonus zebra [123], Camiguin, Philippines (MAB k. 3299). Scale bars are 1.0 mm wide.
The total number of studied specimens per species from the late Albian Koskobilo fauna, the number of specimens with a swelling, the percentage of infestation, and the number of infested specimens per branchial side.
| Anomuran (A) orbrachyuran (B) family | Genus and species | Specimensstudied | Specimenswith a swelling | Percentage | Swelling in leftbranchial side | Swelling in rightbranchial side |
| (A) Galatheidae |
| 17 | 3 | 17.6 | 2 | 1 |
| (A) Galatheidae |
| 174 | 21 | 12.1 | 11 | 10 |
| (A) Galatheidae |
| 24 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (A) Galatheidae |
| 15 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (A) Galatheidae |
| 1 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (A) Galatheidae |
| 2 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (A) Galatheidae |
| 136 | 5 | 3.7 | 1 | 4 |
| (A) Galatheidae |
| 4 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (A) Munidopsidae |
| 3 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (A) Gastrodoridae |
| 10 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) ?Macropipidae |
| 10 | 2 | 20.0 | 2 | |
| (B) Dynomenidae |
| 59 | 1 | 1.7 | 1 | |
| (B) Etyidae |
| 2 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) Feldmanniidae |
| 59 | 1 | 1.7 | 1 | |
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| 69 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| 13 | 1 | 7.7 | 1 | |
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| 23 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| 119 | 1 | 0.8 | 1 | |
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| 4 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| 3 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| 2 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| 2 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| 11 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) Prosopidae |
| 70 | 1 | 1.4 | 1 | |
| (B) Prosopidae |
| 15 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) Homolidae |
| 2 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) Longodromitidae |
| 4 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) Necrocarcinidae |
| 4 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) Torynommidae |
| 3 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| (B) Viaiidae |
| 14 | 1 | 7.1 | 1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paguroids [30], [36] are not listed as their branchial chambers are not preserved typically; the rare priscinachid majoids [29] did not preserve both branchial sides.
Figure 2Carapaces of late Albian anomurans from Koskobilo (Spain) showing swellings (Kanthyloma crusta) in the branchial regions.
Paragalathea ruizi (MAB k. 3008, with paratype of Kanthyloma crusta, MAB k. 3008-i) in dorsal (A) and frontal view (B); Eomunidopsis navarrensis (MGSB78339, with holotype of Kanthyloma crusta, MGSB78340) in dorsal (C) and frontal view (D); E, Eomunidopsis aldoirarensis (MAB k. 2981+ ichnofossil MAB k. 2981-i) in dorsal view; F, Eomunidopsis navarrensis (MAB k. 2982+ ichnofossil MAB k. 2982-i) in left-lateral view; G, Paragalathea ruizi (MAB k. 3189+ ichnofossil MAB k. 3189-i) in dorsal view; and H, Eomunidopsis navarrensis (MAB k. 2644+ ichnofossil MAB k. 2644-i) in dorsal view. Scale bars are 1.0 mm wide.
Figure 3Carapaces of late Albian brachyurans from Koskobilo (Spain) showing swellings (Kanthyloma crusta) in the branchial regions.
Acareprosopon bouvieri (MAB k. 3300+ ichnofossil MAB k. 3300-i) in dorsal (A) and frontal view (B); Graptocarcinus texanus (MAB k. 3174+ ichnofossil MAB k. 3174-i) in dorsal (C) and frontal view (D); Distefania renefraaijei (MAB k. 2601, paratype D. renefraaijei with paratype of Kanthyloma crusta, MAB k. 2601-i) in dorsal (E) and frontal view (F); Caloxanthus paraornatus (MAB k. 3177, with paratype of Kanthyloma crusta, MAB k. 3177-i) in dorsal (G), right-lateral (H), and frontal view (I); Faksecarcinus cf. F. koskobiloensis (MAB k. 3149+ ichnofossil MAB k. 3149-i) in frontal (J) and dorsal view (K); Viaia robusta (MGSB78508+ ichnofossil MGSB78509) in dorsal view (L); and Goniodromites laevis (MAB k. 3301+ ichnofossil MAB k. 3301-i) in dorsal view. E, F modified from Klompmaker et al. [34]; K modified from Klompmaker et al. [28]. Scale bars are 1.0 mm wide.
Figure 4The number of specimens vs infestation percentage at different taxonomic levels.
A, Species level; B, Genus level; C, Family level. Only those taxa with at least 30 specimens are included.
Figure 5The number of infested marine decapod, brachyuran, galatheoid anomuran, and lobster species standardised per 20
Data primarily based on Wienberg Rasmussen et al. [18]; Schweitzer & Feldmann [75], [124], [125]; Schweitzer et al. [126]; Ceccon & De Angeli [20]; Robins et al. [19]; and herein. See Table 3 for additional references. Swellings have not been found in non-galatheoid anomurans and only one infested shrimp is known [182].
Figure 6The percentage of marine decapod, brachyuran, galatheoid anomuran, and lobster species infested per Jurassic and Cretaceous epoch.
The number of infested marine decapod, brachyuran, galatheoid anomuran, lobster, and shrimp species per post-Triassic epoch.
| Epoch | All Decapoda | Brachyura | Galatheoid anomurans | Lobsters | Shrimps |
| Holocene (excl. today) | |||||
| Pleistocene | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pliocene | 1 | 1 | |||
| Miocene | 6 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Oligocene | |||||
| Eocene | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | |
| Paleocene | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Late Cretaceous | 8 | 6 | 2 | ||
| Early Cretaceous | 22 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Late Jurassic | 38 | 23 | 15 | ||
| Middle Jurassic | |||||
| Early Jurassic | 1 | 1 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data primarily based on Wienberg Rasmussen et al. [18]; Schweitzer & Feldmann [75], [124], [125]; Schweitzer et al. [126]; Ceccon & De Angeli [20]; Robins et al. [19]; and herein. See Table 3 for additional references. Swellings have not been found in non-galatheoid anomurans.
All known fossil decapod crustacean species exhibiting a swelling in at least one specimen.
| Anomuran (A),brachyuran (B),lobster (L) orshrimp (S) family | Genus and species | Period andEpoch | Stage | Countryof origin | Sourceused fordataherein |
| (A) Munidopsidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria |
|
| (A) Munidopsidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria |
|
| (A) Munidopsidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria |
|
| (A) Munidopsidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria |
|
| (A) Munidopsidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria |
|
| (A) Munidopsidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria |
|
| (A) Munidopsidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria |
|
| (A) Munidopsidae |
| Late Jurassic | Oxfordian | France |
|
| (A) Munidopsidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria |
|
| (A) Munidopsidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria |
|
| (A) Munidopsidae |
| Late Jurassic | Kimmeridgian,Tithonian | Czech Republic,France, Germany, |
|
| (A) Galatheidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | Spain |
|
| (A) Galatheidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | Spain |
|
| (A) Galatheidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria,Czech Republic |
|
| (A) Galatheidae |
| Neogene, Miocene | Serravallian | Hungary |
|
| (A) Galatheidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria,Czech Republic |
|
| (A) Galatheidae |
| Paleogene, Eocene | Ypresian | Italy |
|
| (A) Galatheidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria,Czech Republic |
|
| (A) Galatheidae |
| Paleogene, Eocene | Priabonian | Italy |
|
| (A) Galatheidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | Spain | herein |
| (A) Galatheidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Czech Republic |
|
| (A) Munididae |
| Paleogene, Paleocene | Danian | Denmark |
|
| (A) Porcellanidae |
| Paleogene, Eocene | Priabonian | Italy |
|
| (A) Porcellanidae |
| Neogene, Miocene | Serravallian | Hungary |
|
| (A) Porcellanidae |
| Neogene, Miocene | Langhian | Hungary |
|
| (B) Dromiidae |
| Paleogene, Eocene | Priabonian | Italy |
|
| (B) Dynomenidae |
| Paleogene, Eocene | Ypresian | Italy |
|
| (B) Dynomenidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria |
|
| (B) Dynomenidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Czech Republic |
|
| (B) Dynomenidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria |
|
| (B) Dynomenidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria |
|
| (B) Dynomenidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Czech Republic |
|
| (B) Dynomenidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Italy |
|
| (B) Dynomenidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | Spain | herein |
| (B) Longodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | Kimmeridgian | Germany |
|
| (B) Longodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | Oxfordian | Germany |
|
| (B) Longodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | Oxfordian | Germany |
|
| (B) Longodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Czech Republic |
|
| (B) Longodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | Oxfordian | Poland |
|
| (B) Nodoprosopidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Czech Republic |
|
| (B) Nodoprosopidae |
| Late Jurassic | Kimmeridgian | Germany |
|
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Czech Republic |
|
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Austria |
|
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | Spain |
|
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Czech Republic |
|
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | – | Poland |
|
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | Oxfordian | Poland |
|
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Czech Republic |
|
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Czech Republic |
|
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | Spain | herein |
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | Tithonian | Czech Republic |
|
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Hauterivian | France |
|
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| Late Jurassic | Oxfordian,Tithonian | Czech Republic,Poland |
|
| (B) Goniodromitidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | England |
|
| (B) Prosopidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | Spain | herein |
| (B) Prosopidae |
| Late Jurassic | ?Tithonian | Germany |
|
| (B) Homolidae |
| Late Cretaceous | Campanian | USA |
|
| (B) Torynommidae |
| Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | New Zealand |
|
| (B) Torynommidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Aptian | England |
|
| (B) Homolodromiidae |
| Late Cretaceous | Campanian | Antarctica |
|
| (B) ?Macropipidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | Spain | herein |
| (B) Palaeocorystidae |
| Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | USA |
|
| (B) Palaeocorystidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | England |
|
| (B) Palaeocorystidae |
| Late Cretaceous | Santonian | Canada |
|
| (B) Palaeocorystidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | England, France |
|
| (B) Palaeocorystidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | England |
|
| (B) Lyreididae |
| Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | Greenland |
|
| (B) Raninidae |
| Paleogene, Eocene | “middle” | Italy |
|
| (B) Raninidae |
| Paleogene, Paleocene | Danian | USA |
|
| (B) Raninidae |
| Paleogene, Paleocene | Danian | USA |
|
| (B) Feldmanniidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | Spain | herein |
| (B) Feldmanniidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | USA |
|
| (B) Aethridae |
| Neogene, Miocene | Serravallian-Tortonian | Panama |
|
| (B) Necrocarcinidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | England |
|
| (B) Pilumnidae |
| Paleogene, Eocene | Ypresian | Italy |
|
| (B) Portunidae |
| Neogene, Pliocene | ?Zanclean | Japan |
|
| (B) Portunidae |
| Neogene, Miocene | – | Brunei |
|
| (B) Leucosiidae |
| Neogene, Miocene | – | Brunei |
|
| (B) Leucosiidae |
| Quaternary, Pleistocene | Middle | Japan |
|
| (B) Viaiidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | Spain |
|
| (L) Mecochiridae |
| Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | Greenland |
|
| (L) Nephropidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Hauterivian | England |
|
| (L) Nephropidae |
| Paleogene, Eocene | Ypresian | England |
|
| (L) Nephropidae |
| Late Cretaceous | Cenomanian | France |
|
| (L) Erymidae |
| Early Jurassic | Toarcian | Indonesia |
|
| (L) Erymidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | England |
|
| (L) Erymidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | England |
|
| (S) Axiidae |
| Early Cretaceous | Albian | USA |
|
* = corrected or added compared to Wienberg Rasmussen et al. [18] for those with that source.
Decapod and galatheoid anomuran species richness and percentage of galatheoids in Mesozoic and Cenozoic reef-associated faunas.
| Localities | Formation | Age rock unit | Total decapodspecies | Galatheoidspecies | Percentagegalatheoids | Referencesused |
| Ernstbrunn quarries,Austria | ErnstbrunnLimestone | Upper Jurassic(Tithonian) | 83 | 35 | 42.2 | [19, 73–76, 124,125, 171–177] |
| Koskobilo quarry,Spain | Eguino | mid-Cretaceous(Albian) | 36 | 10 | 27.8 |
|
| ENCI quarry,The Netherlands | Maastricht | Upper Cretaceous(Maastrichtian) | 30 | 2 | 6.7 |
|
| Faxe quarry,Denmark | Faxe | Lower Paleocene(Danian) | 20 | 4 | 20.0 |
|
| exposures of SzépvölgyLimestone Formation, Hungary | SzépvölgyLimestone | Upper Eocene(Priabonian) | 58 | 9 | 15.5 |
|
| sites in the Börzsöny- andPilis Mountains, Hungary | – | mid-Miocene(Langhian) | 19 | 1 | 5.3 |
|
| localities near Budapestand Diósd, Hungary | – | mid-Miocene(Serravallian) | 15 | 1 | 6.7 |
|
| Depiru Beds, Malta | Upper CorallineLimestone | Upper Miocene(Messinian) | 19 | 3 | 15.8 |
|