Literature DB >> 24666872

Comparison of standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy.

Paul Trottman1, Katrina Swett, Perry Shen, Joseph Sirintrapun.   

Abstract

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) has been reported to provide improved margin resection and lymph node retrieval for tumors of the body and tail of the pancreas compared with standard resection. We examined our experience with RAMPS and standard resection to determine differences in clinicopathologic outcomes. A comparison of RAMPS procedures was made to standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy examining various clinicopathologic variables through retrospective chart review. Twenty-six patients underwent distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy between November 2004 and June 2011. Twenty patients underwent standard resection and six patients underwent RAMPS procedures for a variety of histologies. As a result of the heterogeneity of diseases, which included benign lesions, margin status was not applicable in some cases and therefore was not assessed overall. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum tests demonstrated a significant difference in number of lymph nodes removed with mean of 4.3 and 11.2 lymph nodes obtained for standard resection and RAMPS, respectively (P = 0.03). The RAMPS procedure for lesions of the body and tail of the pancreas retrieved significantly more lymph nodes than standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. It should be the preferred surgical approach when lymph node count is important for tumor staging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24666872      PMCID: PMC4118282     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  8 in total

1.  [Vascular control during left splenopancreatectomy in cancer].

Authors:  P L Fagniez; N Munoz-Bongrand
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Lymphatic system of the pancreas.

Authors:  C C O'Morchoe
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  1997 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; Jeffrey A Drebin; David Linehan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Number of lymph nodes evaluated: prognostic value in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Marianne Huebner; Michael Kendrick; Kaye M Reid-Lombardo; Florencia Que; Terry Therneau; Rui Qin; John Donohue; David Nagorney; Michael Farnell; Michael Sarr
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  J J Bonenkamp; J Hermans; M Sasako; C J van de Velde; K Welvaart; I Songun; S Meyer; J T Plukker; P Van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; J J van Lanschot; C W Taat; P W de Graaf; M F von Meyenfeldt; H Tilanus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Long-term results of resection of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure.

Authors:  Jonathan B Mitchem; Nicholas Hamilton; Feng Gao; William G Hawkins; David C Linehan; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database.

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz; David D Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Prognostic significance of pathologic nodal status in patients with resected pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Michael G House; Mithat Gönen; William R Jarnagin; Michael D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; Murray F Brennan; Peter J Allen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of minimal invasive versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single center retrospective study.

Authors:  Hanyu Zhang; Yatong Li; Quan Liao; Cheng Xing; Cheng Ding; Taiping Zhang; Junchao Guo; Xianlin Han; Qiang Xu; Wenming Wu; Yupei Zhao; Menghua Dai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Complications in Distal Pancreatectomy versus Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy: A Disease Risk Score Analysis Utilizing National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Data.

Authors:  Thomas L Sutton; Kristin C Potter; Skye C Mayo; Rodney Pommier; Erin W Gilbert; Brett C Sheppard
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Toshiya Abe; Kenoki Ohuchida; Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Takao Ohtsuka; Yoshinao Oda; Masafumi Nakamura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The short- and long-term outcomes of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas.

Authors:  Masaaki Murakawa; Toru Aoyama; Masahiro Asari; Yusuke Katayama; Koichiro Yamaoku; Amane Kanazawa; Akio Higuchi; Manabu Shiozawa; Satoshi Kobayashi; Makoto Ueno; Manabu Morimoto; Naoto Yamamoto; Takaki Yoshikawa; Yasushi Rino; Munetaka Masuda; Soichiro Morinaga
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus standard procedure in the treatment of left-sided pancreatic cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Cao; Jia Li; Ang Li; Fei Li
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Extended versus peripancreatic lymph node dissection for the treatment of left-sided pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Huisong Lee; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi; Dong Wook Choi
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Normal Postoperative Computed Tomography Findings after a Variety of Pancreatic Surgeries.

Authors:  Ji Won Seo; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Minwook Lee; Ki Whang Kim; Chang Moo Kang; Myeong-Jin Kim; Yong Eun Chung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Assessement of postoperative long-term survival quality and complications associated with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Quanyu Zhou; Jie Gong; Qingyun Xie; Yu Liu; Qing Wang; Zehua Lei
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Clinical outcome comparison of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy vs. laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma surgical resection.

Authors:  Nan Niu; Yuhui He; Yiping Mou; Sijia Meng; Peng Xu; Yucheng Zhou; Weiwei Jin; Chao Lu; Yunyun Xu; Qicong Zhu; Tao Xia
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.