| Literature DB >> 24666638 |
Andreas Brandl, Quan Yuan, Anja M Boos, Justus P Beier, Andreas Arkudas, Ulrich Kneser, Raymund E Horch, Oliver Bleiziffer1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some studies demonstrated therapeutic angiogenesis attributable to the effects of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), others have reported disappointing results. This may be due to the fact that EPC populations used in these contradictory studies were selected and defined by highly variable and differing experimental protocols. Indeed, the isolation and reliable characterization of ex vivo differentiated EPC raises considerable problems due to the fact there is no biomarker currently available to specifically identify EPC exclusively. On the other hand traditional differentiation of primary immature bone marrow cells towards the endothelial lineage is a time-consuming process of up to 5 weeks. To circumvent these shortcomings, we herein describe a facile method to isolate and enrich a primary cell population from rat bone marrow, combining differential attachment methodology with cell sorting technology.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24666638 PMCID: PMC3987126 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2121-15-12
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cell Biol ISSN: 1471-2121 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1Flow cytometric analyses 2 weeks after isolation and cultivation of rat bone marrow MNC show heterogeneity of the cell population. (a) Cells were grown in specialized endothelial cell growth medium (EGM2 MV) for 2 weeks after isolation and their morphology was examined using light microscopy. The scale bar depicts 100 μm. The cells were further analyzed by Flow Cytometry for expression of endothelial cell-specific surface markers including CD31 (b), CD146 (c) and VEGF-R2 (d). Grey histograms indicate fluorescence signals of negative controls; white histograms indicate fluorescence signals of specific antigens. Results are representative of 4 separate experiments.
Figure 2The heterogenous cell population can be sorted by the ability of cells of the endothelial lineage to take up ac-LDL 488 via specialized scavenger receptors. (a) Cells were incubated with 2.5 μg/ml ac-LDL-Alexa Fluor® 488 for 4 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were subsequently washed twice with PBS and successful uptake was visualized by fluorescence microscopy (left: brightfield, right: fluorescence). The scale bar depicts 100 μm. (b) By using cell sorting technology, cells that have taken up the acetylated LDL-AF488 conjugate were successfully separated from the remaining population with a purity of 92%. Cell distributions are depicted in the plots.
Figure 3Angiogenic potence in Matrigel and fibrin glue of positively sorted primary cells is equal to an endothelial cell line. Positively sorted cells, negatively sorted cells and the liver endothelial cell line EC52 (pos. control) were seeded in cell culture flasks and their phenotype was investigated with light microscopy (top row). 5x104 cells of each population were seeded on Matrigel™ (2nd row) or resuspended in Matrigel™ (3rd row) and 1x105 cells of each population were suspended in fibrin glue (bottom row) to investigate their performance in tube formation assays. Microscope pictures were taken 24 h after cell seeding. The scale bar depicts 100 μm.
Figure 4A homogenous cell population can be detected in FACS-analyses and ac-LDL-uptake assays one week after sorting. (a) Cells were grown in EGM2 MV for 1 week after sorting and analyzed with a light microscope for their phenotypic appearance. The cells were further analyzed by Flow Cytometry for expression of endothelial cell-specific surface markers CD31 (b), CD146 (c) and VEGF-R2 (d). Grey histograms indicate fluorescence signals of negative controls; white histograms indicate fluorescence signals of specific antigens. Results are representative of 4 separate experiments. Cells were incubated with 2.5 μg/ml ac-LDL-DiI for 4 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were subsequently washed twice with PBS and incubated with 5 μg/ml FITC-UEA for 1 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. After an additional washing step with PBS cells were analyzed by fluorescent microscopy (e: brightfield; f: fluorescence overlay). The scale bar depicts 100 μm.