Literature DB >> 24666278

The validity of the variable "NICU admission" as an outcome measure for neonatal morbidity: a retrospective study.

Melanie M J Wiegerinck1, Nora A Danhof, Anton H Van Kaam, Pieter Tamminga, Ben Willem J Mol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether "neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission" is a valid surrogate outcome measure to assess neonatal condition in clinical studies.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary hospital in the Netherlands. POPULATION: Neonates admitted to NICU during a 10-year period. Inclusion was restricted to singletons born beyond 37 weeks of gestation, and admitted to NICU in the first 24 h for delivery-related morbidity.
METHODS: Patient characteristics and admission data were compared for four groups based on the line of care during delivery, i.e. home birth (Ia), midwife-led hospital delivery (Ib), secondary care (II), tertiary care (III). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of neonates/infants that died during NICU admission, diagnosis on admission, treatment received and a Neonatal Therapeutic Intervention Score System (NTISS).
RESULTS: We studied 776 newborns (Ia 52, Ib 25, II 160, III 512, 27 unknown). The mortality rate differed significantly (Ia 15%, Ib 12%, II 22%, III 1%, p < 0.01), as did the NTISS morbidity scores at admission [Ia 12.0 (6.0-23.0), Ib 8.5 (6.3-10.0), II 21.0 (15.0-30.0), III 6.0 (4.0-9.0); p < 0.01], diagnosis at admission, received treatment and the duration of admission.
CONCLUSIONS: The severity of neonatal illness after 37 weeks of gestation differed depending on the line of care in which they were born, with neonates born in secondary care consistently having the highest morbidity, and those born in tertiary care having the lowest. NICU admission should not be used as an outcome measure for neonatal morbidity, specifically not when comparing different birth settings.
© 2014 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neonatal morbidity; birth setting; neonatal intensive care unit; outcome measure; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24666278     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  3 in total

1.  Intrapartum and neonatal mortality among low-risk women in midwife-led versus obstetrician-led care in the Amsterdam region of the Netherlands: a propensity score matched study.

Authors:  Melanie M J Wiegerinck; Birgit Y van der Goes; Anita C J Ravelli; Joris A M van der Post; Fayette C D Buist; Pieter Tamminga; Ben W Mol
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  A systematic review and time-response meta-analysis of the optimal timing of elective caesarean sections for best maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

Authors:  Barbara Prediger; Tim Mathes; Stephanie Polus; Angelina Glatt; Stefanie Bühn; Sven Schiermeier; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Perinatal consequences of a category 1 caesarean section at term.

Authors:  Leah Grace; Ristan M Greer; Sailesh Kumar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.