Literature DB >> 24665832

Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a matched pair analysis.

Yasuyuki Naitoh1, Akihiro Kawauchi, Yasuhiro Yamada, Atsuko Fujihara, Fumiya Hongo, Kazumi Kamoi, Koji Okihara, Tsuneharu Miki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty versus those of conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
METHODS: A total of 26 laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty cases carried out in University Hospital: Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan, from 2008 to 2013 were compared with a control group of 26 age-matched laparoscopic pyeloplasty cases carried out during the same study period.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 20.4 years (range 1-56 years). Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty was carried out on the right in nine cases and on the left in 17 cases. The operative time was 246 ± 68 min. Regarding the 14 pediatric patients, the mean age was 7.1 years (range 1-14 years). The operative time was 243 ± 49 min. As for the 12 adult patients, the mean age was 35.8 years (range 16-56 years). The operative time was 248 ± 86 min. The mean operative time of the control group in age-matched laparoscopic pyeloplasty was 239 ± 51 min. Times were 229 ± 54 min for the pediatric patients and 253 ± 45 min for the adult patients. There was no significant difference in the operative time between the control group and the laparoendoscopic single-site group for both adults and children. Blood loss was minimal, and no intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed in the 26 laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty cases.
CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest that laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty can be used in both pediatric and adult patients, offering a superior cosmetic outcome than conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty, and a lower degree of postoperative pain. A large-scale prospective, randomized study is required to confirm these findings, and to define the future role of laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty.
© 2014 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; pediatrics; pyeloplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24665832     DOI: 10.1111/iju.12427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  6 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Pediatric Urology: Where Do We Stand Today?

Authors:  Omar E Soto-Aviles; Karina Escudero-Chu; Marcos R Perez-Brayfield
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Laparoscopic single-incision triangulated umbilical surgery (SITUS) pyeloplasty: a description of the first 32 cases.

Authors:  Martin Habicher; Theodoros Tokas; Thomas Rw Herrmann; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Laparoendoscopic Single-Site (LESS) Surgery in Pediatric Urology: A 4-Year Experience.

Authors:  Mohamed Zouari; Mahdi Ben Dhaou; Saloua Ammar; Mohamed Jallouli; Riadh Mhiri
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-05-10

Review 4.  Recent advances in urologic surgical techniques for pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Mikolaj Mendrek; Thomas Alexander Vögeli; Christian Bach
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-15

Review 5.  Laparoendoscopic single site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal pyeloplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luis Felipe Brandao; Humberto Laydner; Homayoun Zargar; Fabio Torricelli; Cassio Andreoni; Jihad Kaouk; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

6.  A novel method of bilateral patent processus vaginalis ligation in transumbilical single-site multiport laparoscopic orchiopexy.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Yong Guan; Yong Wu; QingYa Meng; Ming Dong
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.