Literature DB >> 24665729

Evaluation of tetraploid switchgrass (Poales: Poaceae) populations for host suitability and differential resistance to four cereal aphids.

Kyle G Koch, Rachael Fithian, Tiffany M Heng-Moss, Jeff D Bradshaw, Gautam Sarath, Courtney Spilker.   

Abstract

Switchgrass, Panicum virgatum L., is being developed as a bioenergy feedstock. The potential for large-scale production has encouraged its evaluation as a host for important grass pests. Eight no-choice studies were performed for two developmental stages of two switchgrass cultivars ('Kanlow' and'Summer') and two experimental strains, K x S, and S x K produced by reciprocal mating of these cultivars followed by selection for high yield. Plants were evaluated for host suitability and damage differences to herbivory by four important cereal aphids, Sipha flava (Forbes), Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) (biotype I), Rhopalosiphum padi (L.), and Diuraphis noxia (Mordvilko). All switchgrasses were found to be unsuitable feeding and reproductive hosts to R. padi and D. noxia, which were unable to establish on the plants. However, both S. flava and S. graminum were able to establish on all switchgrasses tested. Differential levels of resistance to S. flava and S. graminum were detected among the switchgrasses by both cumulative aphid days (CAD) and plant damage ratings. Kanlow was consistently rated as highly resistant based on CAD and damage ratings for both aphid species, while Summer was consistently among the most susceptible to both aphids at both developmental stages, with relatively high damage ratings. The resistance of the K x S and S x K populations in relationship to their Summer and Kanlow parents indicted that they inherited some resistance to S. graminum and S. flava from their Kanlow parent. These studies provide valuable baseline information concerning the host suitability of switchgrass to four cereal aphids and the plant-insect interactions within a system that has been largely overlooked and indicate that there are genetic differences among switchgrass populations for resistance to some insects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24665729     DOI: 10.1603/ec13315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  5 in total

1.  Divergent Switchgrass Cultivars Modify Cereal Aphid Transcriptomes.

Authors:  Kyle G Koch; Erin D Scully; Nathan A Palmer; Scott M Geib; Gautam Sarath; Tiffany Heng-Moss; Jeffrey D Bradshaw
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Transcriptional analysis of defense mechanisms in upland tetraploid switchgrass to greenbugs.

Authors:  Teresa Donze-Reiner; Nathan A Palmer; Erin D Scully; Travis J Prochaska; Kyle G Koch; Tiffany Heng-Moss; Jeffrey D Bradshaw; Paul Twigg; Keenan Amundsen; Scott E Sattler; Gautam Sarath
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.215

3.  Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda Smith) feeding elicits differential defense responses in upland and lowland switchgrass.

Authors:  Nathan A Palmer; Saumik Basu; Tiffany Heng-Moss; Jeffrey D Bradshaw; Gautam Sarath; Joe Louis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Greenbug (Schizaphis graminum) herbivory significantly impacts protein and phosphorylation abundance in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum).

Authors:  Prince Zogli; Sophie Alvarez; Michael J Naldrett; Nathan A Palmer; Kyle G Koch; Lise Pingault; Jeffrey D Bradshaw; Paul Twigg; Tiffany M Heng-Moss; Joe Louis; Gautam Sarath
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Differential Defense Responses of Upland and Lowland Switchgrass Cultivars to a Cereal Aphid Pest.

Authors:  Lise Pingault; Nathan A Palmer; Kyle G Koch; Tiffany Heng-Moss; Jeffrey D Bradshaw; Javier Seravalli; Paul Twigg; Joe Louis; Gautam Sarath
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.