Literature DB >> 24665682

Crop-emptying rate and the design of pesticide risk assessment schemes in the honey bee and wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

Alice Fournier, Orianne Rollin, Violette Le Féon, Axel Decourtye, Mickaël Henry.   

Abstract

Recent scientific literature and reports from official sanitary agencies have pointed out the deficiency of current pesticide risk assessment processes regarding sublethal effects on pollinators. Sublethal effects include troubles in learning performance, orientation skills, or mobility, with possible contribution to substantial dysfunction at population scale. However, the study of sublethal effects is currently limited by considerable knowledge gaps, particularly for the numerous pollinators other than the honey bee Apis mellifera L.--the traditional model for pesticide risk assessment in pollinators. Here, we propose to use the crop-emptying time as a rule of thumb to guide the design of oral exposure experiments in the honey bee and wild bees. The administration of contaminated sucrose solutions is typically followed by a fasting time lapse to allow complete assimilation before the behavioral tests. The fasting duration should at least encompass the crop-emptying time, because no absorption takes place in the crop. We assessed crop-emptying rate in fasted bees and how it relates 1) with sucrose solution concentration in the honey bee and 2) with body mass in wild bees. Fasting duration required for complete crop emptying in honey bees fed 20 microl of a 50% sucrose solution was nearly 2 h. Actual fasting durations are usually shorter in toxicological studies, suggesting incomplete crop emptying, and therefore partial assimilation of experimental solutions that could imply underestimation of sublethal effects. We also found faster crop-emptying rates in large wild bees compared with smaller wild bees, and suggest operative rules to adapt sublethal assessment schemes accordingly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24665682     DOI: 10.1603/ec13087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  7 in total

1.  No effect of dual exposure to sulfoxaflor and a trypanosome parasite on bumblebee olfactory learning.

Authors:  Owen P Vaughan; Edward A Straw; Alberto Linguadoca; Mark J F Brown
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Controlling the impact of the managed honeybee on wild bees in protected areas.

Authors:  Mickaël Henry; Guy Rodet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  A neonicotinoid pesticide impairs foraging, but not learning, in free-flying bumblebees.

Authors:  F Muth; A S Leonard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  No evidence for negative impacts of acute sulfoxaflor exposure on bee olfactory conditioning or working memory.

Authors:  Harry Siviter; Alfie Scott; Grégoire Pasquier; Christopher D Pull; Mark J F Brown; Ellouise Leadbeater
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  BeeGUTS-A Toxicokinetic-Toxicodynamic Model for the Interpretation and Integration of Acute and Chronic Honey Bee Tests.

Authors:  Jan Baas; Benoit Goussen; Mark Miles; Thomas G Preuss; Ivo Roessink
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.218

6.  Effect of acute pesticide exposure on bee spatial working memory using an analogue of the radial-arm maze.

Authors:  Elizabeth E W Samuelson; Zachary P Chen-Wishart; Richard J Gill; Ellouise Leadbeater
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Detrimental effects of clothianidin on foraging and dance communication in honey bees.

Authors:  Léa Tison; Aron Duer; Vanda Púčiková; Uwe Greggers; Randolf Menzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.