Literature DB >> 24665051

Predictive risk factors of free flap thrombosis in breast reconstruction surgery.

Hossein Masoomi1, Emily G Clark, Keyianoosh Z Paydar, Gregory R D Evans, Audrey Nguyen, Mark R Kobayashi, Garrett A Wirth.   

Abstract

Vascular thrombosis is one of the major postoperative complications of free flap microvascular breast reconstruction operations. It is associated with higher morbidity, higher cost, increased length of hospital stay, and potentially flap loss. Our purpose is to evaluate the rate of this complication and whether patient characteristics play a role. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we examined the clinical data of patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction between 2009 and 2010 in the United States. Multivariate and univariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors of flap thrombosis. A total of 15,211 patients underwent free flap breast reconstruction surgery (immediate reconstruction: 43%). The most common flap was the free deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap (53.6%), followed by free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap (43.1%), free superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap (2%), and free gluteal artery perforator (GAP) flap (1.3%). The overall rate of flap thrombosis was 2.4 %, with the highest rate seen in the SIEA group (11.4%) and the lowest in the TRAM group (1.7%). Peripheral vascular disease (adjusted odds ration [AOR] 10.61), SIEA flap (AOR, 4.76) and delayed reconstruction (AOR, 1.42) were found to be statistically significant risk factors for flap thrombosis. Other comorbidities were not linked. While the overall rate of flap thrombosis in free flap breast reconstruction was relatively low (2.4%), Plastic Surgeons should be aware that patients with peripheral vascular disease and those undergoing free SIEA flap are at higher risk of flap thrombosis and they should closely monitor flaps to increase the chance for early salvage.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24665051     DOI: 10.1002/micr.22250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  10 in total

Review 1.  Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Sophocles H Voineskos; Simon G Frank; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

2.  Peri-operative risk factors for complications of free flaps in traumatic wounds - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Raquel Bernardelli Iamaguchi; Renan Lyuji Takemura; Gustavo Bersani Silva; Jairo Andre de Oliveira Alves; Luciano Ruiz Torres; Alvaro Baik Cho; Teng Hsiang Wei; Marcelo Rosa de Rezende; Rames Mattar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Morbidity of the Donor Site and Complication Rates of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Abdominal Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hatan Mortada; Taif Fawaz AlNojaidi; Razan AlRabah; Yousif Almohammadi; Raghad AlKhashan; Hattan Aljaaly
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 2.269

4.  The prognostic role of extended preoperative hypercoagulability work-up in high-risk microsurgical free flaps: a single-center retrospective case series of patients with heterozygotic factor V Leiden thrombophilia.

Authors:  Florian Falkner; Benjamin Thomas; Martin Aman; Eva-Maria Risse; Gerhard Wittenberg; Emre Gazyakan; Leila Harhaus; Amir K Bigdeli; Ulrich Kneser; Christian A Radu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 2.030

5.  Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.

Authors:  Jessica Erdmann-Sager; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Gretchen E Guldbrandsen; Yoon S Chun
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Breast Reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Claire Temple-Oberle; Melissa A Shea-Budgell; Mark Tan; John L Semple; Christiaan Schrag; Marcio Barreto; Phillip Blondeel; Jeremy Hamming; Joseph Dayan; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.169

Review 7.  Breast reconstruction with anatomical implants: A review of indications and techniques based on current literature.

Authors:  Marco Gardani; Nicolò Bertozzi; Michele Pio Grieco; Marianna Pesce; Francesco Simonacci; PierLuigi Santi; Edoardo Raposio
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-07-20

8.  The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 30-Day Challenge: Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Reporting Reliability.

Authors:  Austin D Chen; Parisa Kamali; Anmol S Chattha; Alexandra Bucknor; Justin B Cohen; Patrick P Bletsis; Renata Flecha-Hirsch; Adam M Tobias; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-03-06

9.  Predictors of Reoperations in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Dmytro Unukovych; Camilo Hernandez Gallego; Helena Aineskog; Andres Rodriguez-Lorenzo; Maria Mani
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-08-29

10.  Patient Race and Provider Predict Patient Satisfaction Following Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ashkaun Shaterian; Jessica Gandy; Shadi Lalezari; Sarah Smith; Keyianoosh Paydar
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.