Literature DB >> 24664695

IROme, a new high-throughput molecular tool for the diagnosis of inherited retinal dystrophies-a price comparison with Sanger sequencing.

Daniel F Schorderet1, Maude Bernasconi, Leila Tiab, Tatiana Favez, Pascal Escher.   

Abstract

The molecular diagnosis of retinal dystrophies (RD) is difficult because of genetic and clinical heterogeneity. Previously, the molecular screening of genes was done one by one, sometimes in a scheme based on the frequency of sequence variants and the number of exons/length of the candidate genes. Payment for these procedures was complicated and the sequential billing of several genes created endless paperwork. We therefore evaluated the costs of generating and sequencing a hybridization-based DNA library enriched for the 64 most frequently mutated genes in RD, called IROme, and compared them to the costs of amplifying and sequencing these genes by the Sanger method. The production cost generated by the high-throughput (HT) sequencing of IROme was established at CHF 2,875.75 per case. Sanger sequencing of the same exons cost CHF 69,399.02. Turnaround time of the analysis was 3 days for IROme. For Sanger sequencing, it could only be estimated, as we never sequenced all 64 genes in one single patient. Sale cost for IROme calculated on the basis of the sale cost of one exon by Sanger sequencing is CHF 8,445.88, which corresponds to the sale price of 40 exons. In conclusion, IROme is cheaper and faster than Sanger sequencing and therefore represents a sound approach for the diagnosis of RD, both scientifically and economically. As a drop in the costs of HT sequencing is anticipated, target resequencing might become the new gold standard in the molecular diagnosis of RD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24664695     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3209-8_22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  3 in total

1.  PRPH2 mutation update: In silico assessment of 245 reported and 7 novel variants in patients with retinal disease.

Authors:  Manon H C A Peeters; Mubeen Khan; Anoek A M B Rooijakkers; Timo Mulders; Lonneke Haer-Wigman; Camiel J F Boon; Caroline C W Klaver; L Ingeborgh van den Born; Carel B Hoyng; Frans P M Cremers; Anneke I den Hollander; Claire-Marie Dhaenens; Rob W J Collin
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.700

Review 2.  CNGB1-related rod-cone dystrophy: A mutation review and update.

Authors:  Marco Nassisi; Vasily M Smirnov; Cyntia Solis Hernandez; Saddek Mohand-Saïd; Christel Condroyer; Aline Antonio; Laura Kühlewein; Melanie Kempf; Susanne Kohl; Bernd Wissinger; Fadi Nasser; Sara D Ragi; Nan-Kai Wang; Janet R Sparrow; Vivienne C Greenstein; Stylianos Michalakis; Omar A Mahroo; Rola Ba-Abbad; Michel Michaelides; Andrew R Webster; Simona Degli Esposti; Brooke Saffren; Jenina Capasso; Alex Levin; William W Hauswirth; Claire-Marie Dhaenens; Sabine Defoort-Dhellemmes; Stephen H Tsang; Eberhart Zrenner; Jose-Alain Sahel; Simon M Petersen-Jones; Christina Zeitz; Isabelle Audo
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 4.700

3.  Genetic spectrum of retinal dystrophies in Tunisia.

Authors:  Imen Habibi; Yosra Falfoul; Ahmed Turki; Asma Hassairi; Khaled El Matri; Ahmed Chebil; Daniel F Schorderet; Leila El Matri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.