Literature DB >> 24664633

Relationship between whole-body tumor burden, clinical phenotype, and quality of life in patients with neurofibromatosis.

Vanessa L Merker1, Miriam A Bredella, Wenli Cai, Ara Kassarjian, Gordon J Harris, Alona Muzikansky, Rosa Nguyen, Victor F Mautner, Scott R Plotkin.   

Abstract

Patients with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), NF2, and schwannomatosis share a predisposition to develop multiple nerve sheath tumors. Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with NF1 and NF2 have reduced quality of life (QOL), but no studies have examined the relationship between whole-body tumor burden and QOL in these patients. We administered a QOL questionnaire (the SF-36) and a visual analog pain scale (VAS) to a previously described cohort of adult neurofibromatosis patients undergoing whole-body MRI. One-sample t-tests were used to compare norm-based SF-36 scores to weighted population means. Spearman correlation coefficients and multiple linear regression analyses controlling for demographic and disease-specific clinical variable were used to relate whole-body tumor volume to QOL scales. Two hundred forty-five patients (142 NF1, 53 NF2, 50 schwannomatosis) completed the study. Subjects showed deficits in selected subscales of the SF-36 compared to adjusted general population means. In bivariate analysis, increased tumor volume was significantly associated with pain in schwannomatosis patients, as measured by the SF-36 bodily pain subscale (rho = -0.287, P = 0.04) and VAS (rho = 0.34, P = 0.02). Regression models for NF2 patients showed a positive relationship between tumor burden and increased pain, as measured by the SF-36 (P = 0.008). Patients with NF1, NF2, and schwannomatosis suffer from reduced QOL, although only pain shows a clear relationship to patient's overall tumor burden. These findings suggest that internal tumor volume is not a primary contributor to QOL and emphasize the need for comprehensive treatment approaches that go beyond tumor-focused therapies such as surgery by including psychosocial interventions.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SF-36; nerve sheath tumor; neurofibromatosis 1; neurofibromatosis 2; pain; quality of life; schwannomatosis; whole-body MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24664633     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  17 in total

1.  Sirolimus for progressive neurofibromatosis type 1-associated plexiform neurofibromas: a neurofibromatosis Clinical Trials Consortium phase II study.

Authors:  Brian Weiss; Brigitte C Widemann; Pamela Wolters; Eva Dombi; Alexander Vinks; Alan Cantor; John Perentesis; Elizabeth Schorry; Nicole Ullrich; David H Gutmann; James Tonsgard; David Viskochil; Bruce Korf; Roger J Packer; Michael J Fisher
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Spinal manifestations of Neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Ben Shofty; Ori Barzilai; Morsi Khashan; Zvi Lidar; Shlomi Constantini
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  First use of patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) measures in adults with neurofibromatosis.

Authors:  Mojtaba Talaei-Khoei; Eric Riklin; Vanessa L Merker; Monica R Sheridan; Justin T Jordan; Scott R Plotkin; Ana-Maria Vranceanu
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Therapeutic advances for the tumors associated with neurofibromatosis type 1, type 2, and schwannomatosis.

Authors:  Jaishri O Blakeley; Scott R Plotkin
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Current status and recommendations for imaging in neurofibromatosis type 1, neurofibromatosis type 2, and schwannomatosis.

Authors:  Shivani Ahlawat; Jaishri O Blakeley; Shannon Langmead; Allan J Belzberg; Laura M Fayad
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Patient-reported outcomes of pain and physical functioning in neurofibromatosis clinical trials.

Authors:  Pamela L Wolters; Staci Martin; Vanessa L Merker; James H Tonsgard; Sondra E Solomon; Andrea Baldwin; Amanda L Bergner; Karin Walsh; Heather L Thompson; Kathy L Gardner; Cynthia M Hingtgen; Elizabeth Schorry; William N Dudley; Barbara Franklin
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Quality of Life in Adults with Neurofibromatosis 1 in Brazil.

Authors:  Natália Parenti Bicudo; Balduíno Ferreira de Menezes Neto; Lucimar Retto da Silva de Avó; Carla Maria Ramos Germano; Débora Gusmão Melo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Lifespan Development: Symptoms Experienced by Individuals with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated Plexiform Neurofibromas from Childhood into Adulthood.

Authors:  Sally E Jensen; Zabin S Patel; Robert Listernick; Joel Charrow; Jin-Shei Lai
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2019-09

9.  Current whole-body MRI applications in the neurofibromatoses: NF1, NF2, and schwannomatosis.

Authors:  Shivani Ahlawat; Laura M Fayad; Muhammad Shayan Khan; Miriam A Bredella; Gordon J Harris; D Gareth Evans; Said Farschtschi; Michael A Jacobs; Avneesh Chhabra; Johannes M Salamon; Ralph Wenzel; Victor F Mautner; Eva Dombi; Wenli Cai; Scott R Plotkin; Jaishri O Blakeley
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  The MEK inhibitor selumetinib reduces spinal neurofibroma burden in patients with NF1 and plexiform neurofibromas.

Authors:  Sadhana Jackson; Eva H Baker; Andrea M Gross; Patricia Whitcomb; Andrea Baldwin; Joanne Derdak; Cecilia Tibery; Jennifer Desanto; Amanda Carbonell; Kaleb Yohay; Geraldine O'Sullivan; Alice P Chen; Brigitte C Widemann; Eva Dombi
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2020-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.