Literature DB >> 24664567

Effects of flow rate and gas mixture on the welfare of weaned and neonate pigs during gas euthanasia.

L J Sadler1, C D Hagen, C Wang, T M Widowski, A K Johnson, S T Millman.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to assess efficacy and welfare implications of gas euthanasia when applied to weaned and neonate pigs. Parameters associated with welfare, which were measured before loss of consciousness, included open-mouth breathing, ataxia, righting response, and escape attempts. Two age groups (weaned and neonate) were assessed in 9 gas treatments arranged in a 2 × 4 factorial design, with 2 gas types (CO2 = 100% CO2 and 50:50 = 50:50 CO2:argon) and 4 flow rates (box volume exchange/min: slow = 20%; medium = 35%; fast = 50%; prefill = prefilled followed by 20%) and a control treatment in which ambient air was passed through the box. Pig pairs (10/treatment) were placed in a modified Euthanex AgPro system (Euthanex Corp., Palmer, PA). Behavioral and physiological responses were observed directly and from video recordings for latency, duration, prevalence (percent of pigs affected), and frequency (number of occurrences/pig). Data were analyzed as linear mixed models or with a Cox proportional hazard model as appropriate. Piglet pair was the experimental unit. For the weaned pig, welfare was superior with CO2 relative to 50:50 within 1 or more flow rates on the basis of reduced duration of open-mouth breathing, duration of ataxia, frequency of escape attempts, and duration and frequency of righting response (P < 0.05). No measured parameters indicated superior welfare with the use of 50:50, whereas latencies to loss of posture and last movement favored CO2 (P < 0.05). Faster flow rates were associated with reduced (P < 0.05) duration or frequency of open-mouth breathing, ataxia, and righting response, as well as superior (P < 0.05) indicators of efficacy, including latencies to loss of posture, gasping, and last movement, relative to slower flow rates. Weaned pigs were more likely to defecate (P < 0.01), display nasal discharge (P < 0.05), and display longer (P < 0.001) latencies to loss of posture and last movement than neonates. Duration of ataxia was the only parameter for which neonates were superior (P < 0.01) to weaned pigs during euthanasia. As such, a 50:50 CO2:argon gas mixture and slower flow rates should be avoided when euthanizing weaned or neonate pigs with gas methods. Neonate pigs succumb to the effects of gas euthanasia quicker than weaned pigs and display fewer signs of distress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24664567     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  The effect of light level, CO2 flow rate, and anesthesia on the stress response of mice during CO2 euthanasia.

Authors:  Karin Powell; Kelly Ethun; Douglas K Taylor
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 12.625

2.  Euthanasia of meat rabbits with carbon dioxide: Behavioral and physiologic responses to gas chamber gradual- and fast-fill rates.

Authors:  Jessica L Walsh; John Van de Vegte; Brianne Mercer; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Evaluation of Different Gases and Gas Combinations for On-Farm Euthanasia of Pre-Weaned Pigs.

Authors:  Nikki Kells; Ngaio Beausoleil; Craig Johnson; Mhairi Sutherland
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  A Two-Step Process of Nitrous Oxide before Carbon Dioxide for Humanely Euthanizing Piglets: On-Farm Trials.

Authors:  Rebecca K Smith; Jean-Loup Rault; Richard S Gates; Donald C Lay
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Behavioral Response of Weaned Pigs during Gas Euthanasia with CO2, CO2 with Butorphanol, or Nitrous Oxide.

Authors:  Enver Çavuşoğlu; Jean-Loup Rault; Richard Gates; Donald C Lay
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  COVID-19 Effects on Livestock Production: A One Welfare Issue.

Authors:  Jeremy N Marchant-Forde; Laura A Boyle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-09-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.