Literature DB >> 24664560

Effects of maternal nutrient restriction followed by realimentation during early and midgestation on beef cows. I. Maternal performance and organ weights at different stages of gestation.

L E Camacho1, C O Lemley, M L Van Emon, J S Caton, K C Swanson, K A Vonnahme.   

Abstract

The objectives were to evaluate the effects of nutrient restriction during early to midgestation followed by realimentation on maternal performance and organ mass in pregnant beef cows. On d 30 of pregnancy, multiparous, nonlactating cows (initial BW = 620.5 ± 11.3 kg and BCS = 5.1 ± 0.1) were assigned to 1 of 3 dietary treatments: control (CON; 100% NRC; n = 18) and restricted (RES; 60% NRC; n = 30). On d 85, cows were slaughtered (CON, n = 6; R, n = 6), remained on control (CC; n = 12) and restricted (RR; n = 12), or were realimented to control (RC; n = 11). On d 140, cows were slaughtered (CC, n = 6; RR, n = 6; RC, n = 5), remained on control (CCC, n = 6; RCC, n = 5), or were realimented to control (RRC, n = 6). On d 254, all remaining cows were slaughtered. Cows were weighed before slaughter and all maternal organs were dissected and weighed. The diet consisted of grass hay to meet 100 or 60% NEm recommendations for fetal growth and to meet or exceed recommendations for other nutrients. At d 85 slaughters, BW and empty BW (EBW) were not affected (P ≥ 0.84) by maternal nutrition. However back fat was decreased (P = 0.05) in RES vs. CON cows. Large intestine and abomasum mass were increased (P ≤ 0.05) in RES cows vs. CON. At d 140, BW was decreased (P = 0.05) and EBW tended to be decreased (P = 0.10) in RRC cows vs. CCC and RCC being intermediate. Liver mass was decreased (P = 0.02) in RR vs. CC with RC being intermediate. Ruminal mass was decreased (P = 0.003) in RR vs. CC and RC cows. At d 254, BW and EBW were similar (P ≥ 0.78) across treatments. We observed partial changes in maternal weight and organ masses due to different lengths of maternal nutrient restriction followed by realimentation. It appears that the dam undergoes some adaptations during an early to midgestation nutrient restriction and becomes more efficient in the utilization of nutrients after being realimented and as gestation advances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24664560     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-7017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Effects of Nutrient Restriction During Midgestation to Late Gestation on Maternal and Fetal Postruminal Carbohydrase Activities in Sheep.

Authors:  Ronald J Trotta; Manuel A Vasquez-Hidalgo; Kimberly A Vonnahme; Kendall C Swanson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  CELL BIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM: METABOLIC RESPONSES TO STRESS: FROM ANIMAL TO CELL: Poor maternal nutrition during gestation: effects on offspring whole-body and tissue-specific metabolism in livestock species1,2.

Authors:  Kristen E Govoni; Sarah A Reed; Steven A Zinn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Role of the Small Intestine in Developmental Programming: Impact of Maternal Nutrition on the Dam and Offspring.

Authors:  Allison M Meyer; Joel S Caton
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  Melatonin-induced changes in the bovine vaginal microbiota during maternal nutrient restriction.

Authors:  Riley D Messman; Zully E Contreras-Correa; Henry A Paz; Caleb O Lemley
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Evidence for liver energy metabolism programming in offspring subjected to intrauterine undernutrition during midgestation.

Authors:  Xiaoling Zhou; Hong Yang; Qiongxian Yan; Ao Ren; Zhiwei Kong; Shaoxun Tang; Xuefeng Han; Zhiliang Tan; Abdelfattah Z M Salem
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.169

6.  Energy metabolism of pregnant zebu and crossbred zebu dairy cattle.

Authors:  Helena Ferreira Lage; Ana Luiza da Costa Cruz Borges; Ricardo Reis E Silva; Alan Maia Borges; José Reinaldo Mendes Ruas; Pedro Henrique Araújo de Carvalho; Marcelina Pereira da Fonseca; Paolo Antônio Dutra Vivenza; Lúcio Carlos Gonçalves; André Santos de Souza; Antônio Último de Carvalho; Elias Jorge Facury Filho; Edilane Aparecida Silva; Joana Ribeiro da Glória; Alexandre Lima Ferreira; Rodrigo Melo Meneses; Eloísa de Oliveira Simões Saliba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Gestational dietary protein is associated with sex specific decrease in blood flow, fetal heart growth and post-natal blood pressure of progeny.

Authors:  Juan H Hernandez-Medrano; Katrina J Copping; Andrew Hoare; Wendela Wapanaar; Rosalie Grivell; Tim Kuchel; Giuliana Miguel-Pacheco; I Caroline McMillen; Raymond J Rodgers; Viv E A Perry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.