Literature DB >> 24664513

Prevalence of visual-functional mismatch regarding coronary artery stenosis in the CVIT-DEFER registry.

Masato Nakamura1, Masakazu Yamagishi, Takafumi Ueno, Kazuhiro Hara, Sugao Ishiwata, Tomonori Itoh, Ichiro Hamanaka, Tetsuzo Wakatsuki, Teruyasu Sugano, Kazuya Kawai, Takashi Akasaka, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Takeshi Kimura.   

Abstract

The fractional flow reserve (FFR) is considered to be a reliable index for the assessment of clinically relevant coronary artery stenosis. However, mismatch in assessing the severity of coronary stenosis between coronary angiography and the FFR has been pointed out. The cardiovascular intervention therapeutics (CVIT)-DEFER registry is a prospective multicenter registry study that has enrolled 3,228 consecutive patients among 3,804 patients with angiographically moderate coronary artery lesions in whom FFR analysis was clinically indicated. The demographic and angiographic parameters associated with an FFR ≤0.8 were analyzed, and the incidence of discrepancy between the angiographic severity of coronary stenosis and the FFR was assessed. Based on the visual assessment, 1,609 (42.9%) lesions were categorized as showing 50% stenosis, 1,882 lesions (50.2%) as 75% stenosis, and 257 lesions (6.9%) as 90% stenosis. Angiographic-FFR "mismatch," which was defined as visual stenosis ≥75% with FFR >0.80, was found in 43.4% of lesions, while reverse angiographic mismatch (visual stenosis <75% with FFR ≤0.8) was found in 23.2%. The independent predictors for "angiographic-FFR mismatch" were the presence of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) history, one-vessel disease, non-left anterior descending artery (LAD) location, non-diffuse lesion, non-ostial lesion, and non-tandem lesion. Conversely, "reverse angiographic mismatch" was independently associated with the multivessel disease, LAD location, and diffuse lesion. The FFR is not only influenced by luminal stenosis but also by coronary artery morphology and the amount of jeopardized myocardium. Angiographic-FFR mismatch is frequent in patients with moderate coronary stenosis, which suggests the clinical importance of using physiological assessment to guide PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24664513     DOI: 10.1007/s12928-014-0259-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther        ISSN: 1868-4297


  9 in total

1.  Influence of plaque characteristics on fractional flow reserve for coronary lesions with intermediate to obstructive stenosis: insights from integrated-backscatter intravascular ultrasound analysis.

Authors:  Shinichiro Sakurai; Hiroaki Takashima; Katsuhisa Waseda; Masahiko Gosho; Akiyoshi Kurita; Hirohiko Ando; Kazuyuki Maeda; Akihiro Suzuki; Masanobu Fujimoto; Tetsuya Amano
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics-update 2022.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Kawase; Hitoshi Matsuo; Shoichi Kuramitsu; Yasutsugu Shiono; Takashi Akasaka; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Tetsuya Amano; Ken Kozuma; Masato Nakamura; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Yoshio Kobayashi; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-05-11

3.  Prognostic value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention diastolic pressure ratio.

Authors:  K Masdjedi; L J C van Zandvoort; T Neleman; I Kardys; J Ligthart; W K Den Dekker; R Diletti; F Zijlstra; N M Van Mieghem; J Daemen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.854

Review 4.  Comparison of coronary angiography and intracoronary imaging with fractional flow reserve for coronary artery disease evaluation: An anatomical-functional mismatch.

Authors:  Julien Adjedj; Nikolay Stoyanov; Olivier Muller
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.596

5.  Impact of Hydrostatic Pressure Variations Caused by Height Differences in Supine and Prone Positions on Fractional Flow Reserve Values in the Coronary Circulation.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Kawaguchi; Kazuki Ito; Humihiko Kin; Yusuke Shirai; Ayako Okazaki; Keisuke Miyajima; Tomoyuki Watanabe; Mariko Tatsuguchi; Yasushi Wakabayashi; Yuichiro Maekawa
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Utility of Saline-Induced Resting Full-Cycle Ratio Compared with Resting Full-Cycle Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Takao Sato; Sonoka Goto; Yusuke Ohta; Yuji Taya; Sho Yuasa; Minoru Takahashi; Masaaki Okabe; Yoshifusa Aizawa
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Impact of the caFFR-Guided Functional SYNTAX Score on Ventricular Tachycardia/Fibrillation Development in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Jiazhi Pan; Qiuxia Zhang; Li Lei; Yaode Chen; Guodong Li; Hongbin Liang; Junyan Lu; Xinlu Zhang; Yongzhen Tang; Jun Pu; Yining Yang; Dapeng Mo; Jiancheng Xiu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 8.  Health economics-based verification of functional myocardial ischemia evaluation of stable coronary artery disease in Japan: A long-term longitudinal study using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Takura; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Naoya Matsumoto; Eri Yoshida; Tomoaki Nakata
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.872

9.  Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Lesions With Angiographically Insignificant Stenosis But Low Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Joo Myung Lee; Bon-Kwon Koo; Eun-Seok Shin; Chang-Wook Nam; Joon-Hyung Doh; Xinyang Hu; Fei Ye; Shaoliang Chen; Junqing Yang; Jiyan Chen; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Hitoshi Matsuo; Hiroaki Takashima; Yasutsugu Shiono; Doyeon Hwang; Jonghanne Park; Kyung-Jin Kim; Takashi Akasaka; Jianan Wang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 5.501

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.