Literature DB >> 24664441

Ethical challenges for accountable care organizations: a structured review.

Matthew DeCamp1, Neil J Farber, Alexia M Torke, Maura George, Zackary Berger, Carla C Keirns, Lauris C Kaldjian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accountable care organizations (ACOs) are proliferating as a solution to the cost crisis in American health care, and already involve as many as 31 million patients. ACOs hold clinicians, group practices, and in many circumstances hospitals financially accountable for reducing expenditures and improving their patients' health outcomes. The structure of health care affects the ethical issues arising in the practice of medicine; therefore, like all health care organizational structures, ACOs will experience ethical challenges. No framework exists to assist key ACO stakeholders in identifying or managing these challenges.
METHODS: We conducted a structured review of the medical ACO literature using qualitative content analysis to inform identification of ethical challenges for ACOs.
RESULTS: Our analysis found infrequent discussion of ethics as an explicit concern for ACOs. Nonetheless, we identified nine critical ethical challenges, often described in other terms, for ACO stakeholders. Leaders could face challenges regarding fair resource allocation (e.g., about fairly using ACOs' shared savings), protection of professionals' ethical obligations (especially related to the design of financial incentives), and development of fair decision processes (e.g., ensuring that beneficiary representatives on the ACO board truly represent the ACO's patients). Clinicians could perceive threats to their professional autonomy (e.g., through cost control measures), a sense of dual or conflicted responsibility to their patients and the ACO, or competition with other clinicians. For patients, critical ethical challenges will include protecting their autonomy, ensuring privacy and confidentiality, and effectively engaging them with the ACO. DISCUSSION: ACOs are not inherently more or less "ethical" than other health care payment models, such as fee-for-service or pure capitation. ACOs' nascent development and flexibility in design, however, present a time-sensitive opportunity to ensure their ethical operation, promote their success, and refine their design and implementation by identifying, managing, and conducting research into the ethical issues they might face.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24664441      PMCID: PMC4175644          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-2833-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  48 in total

Review 1.  Gastroenterologists and accountable care organizations.

Authors:  Michael Komar; Robert Smith; Eileen Patten
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2011-10-08

2.  Physician autonomy and health care reform.

Authors:  Ezekiel J Emanuel; Steven D Pearson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Creating accountable care organizations: the extended hospital medical staff.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; Douglas O Staiger; Julie P W Bynum; Daniel J Gottlieb
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; Thomas W Nolan; John Whittington
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  A cautious path forward on accountable care organizations.

Authors:  Barak D Richman; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Engaging physicians and leveraging professionalism: a key to success for quality measurement and improvement.

Authors:  Patrick H Conway; Christine K Cassel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Why the ethics of parsimonious medicine is not the ethics of rationing.

Authors:  Jon C Tilburt; Christine K Cassel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Leading clinicians and clinicians leading.

Authors:  Richard M J Bohmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Accountable care organizations and ESRD: the time has come.

Authors:  Allen R Nissenson; Franklin W Maddux; Ruben L Velez; Tracy J Mayne; Jess Parks
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Care coordination in accountable care organizations: moving beyond structure and incentives.

Authors:  Matthew J Press; Marilyn D Michelow; Lucy H MacPhail
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  7 in total

1.  Ethical Practice Under Accountable Care.

Authors:  Abraham D Graber; Asha Bhandary; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2016-06

2.  The Case for Enrolling High-Cost Patients in an ACO.

Authors:  Abraham Graber; Shane Carter; Asha Bhandary; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2017-12

3.  Low-Value Care and Clinician Engagement in a Large Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO: a Survey of Frontline Clinicians.

Authors:  Adam A Markovitz; Michael D Rozier; Andrew M Ryan; Susan D Goold; John Z Ayanian; Edward C Norton; Timothy A Peterson; John M Hollingsworth
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Are ACOs on uncertain ethical ground and a threat to the autonomy of patients and physicians?

Authors:  Gene Lindsey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  'You can give them wings to fly': a qualitative study on values-based leadership in health care.

Authors:  Yvonne Denier; Lieve Dhaene; Chris Gastmans
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Gynecologic oncology care in the world of accountable care organizations.

Authors:  K M Dorney; S K Rao; R C Sisodia; M G Del Carmen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-10-24

7.  Doubly distributing special obligations: what professional practice can learn from parenting.

Authors:  Jon Tilburt; Baruch Brody
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.903

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.