Literature DB >> 24664241

Evolving shale gas management: water resource risks, impacts, and lessons learned.

Brian G Rahm1, Susan J Riha.   

Abstract

Unconventional shale gas development promises to significantly alter energy portfolios and economies around the world. It also poses a variety of environmental risks, particularly with respect to the management of water resources. We review current scientific understanding of risks associated with the following: water withdrawals for hydraulic fracturing; wastewater treatment, discharge and disposal; methane and fluid migration in the subsurface; and spills and erosion at the surface. Some of these risks are relatively unique to shale gas development, while others are variations of risks that we already face from a variety of industries and activities. All of these risks depend largely on the pace and scale of development that occurs within a particular region. We focus on the United States, where the shale gas boom has been on-going for several years, paying particular attention to the Marcellus Shale, where a majority of peer-reviewed study has taken place. Governments, regulatory agencies, industry, and other stakeholders are challenged with responding to these risks, and we discuss policies and practices that have been adopted or considered by these various groups. Adaptive Management, a structured framework for addressing complex environmental issues, is discussed as a way to reduce polarization of important discussions on risk, and to more formally engage science in policy-making, along with other economic, social and value considerations. Data suggests that some risks can be substantially reduced through policy and best practice, but also that significant uncertainty persists regarding other risks. We suggest that monitoring and data collection related to water resource risks be established as part of planning for shale gas development before activity begins, and that resources are allocated to provide for appropriate oversight at various levels of governance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24664241     DOI: 10.1039/c4em00018h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  4 in total

Review 1.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 2.  Organic Pollutants in Shale Gas Flowback and Produced Waters: Identification, Potential Ecological Impact, and Implications for Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Andrii Butkovskyi; Harry Bruning; Stefan A E Kools; Huub H M Rijnaarts; Annemarie P Van Wezel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Unconventional natural gas development did not result in detectable changes in water chemistry (within the South Fork Little Red River).

Authors:  Bradley J Austin; Erin Scott; Leslie Massey; Michelle A Evans-White; Sally Entrekin; Brian E Haggard
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Stream Vulnerability to Widespread and Emergent Stressors: A Focus on Unconventional Oil and Gas.

Authors:  Sally A Entrekin; Kelly O Maloney; Katherine E Kapo; Annika W Walters; Michelle A Evans-White; Kenneth M Klemow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.